|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 21, 2020 13:35:14 GMT
From the Bakerloo Line Twitter feed
First there was... then this... then this... then this... but half an hour later...
Maybe a load of drivers decided they didn't want to lose a day's pay when ASLEF have sorted things out.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 21, 2020 13:47:13 GMT
Possibly a greater proportion of early turn drivers are RMT members than are those starting later.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 21, 2020 14:41:35 GMT
Currently 13 trains running Queens Park to Elephant & Castle
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 21, 2020 19:21:09 GMT
Looks like they kept up the core service until 15:45 then switched to Queen's Park to Harrow & Wealdstone although from Trackernet it doesn't look as if any trains are running apart from London Overground.
|
|
|
Post by dpr on Feb 21, 2020 21:24:26 GMT
Looks like they kept up the core service until 15:45 then switched to Queen's Park to Harrow & Wealdstone although from Trackernet it doesn't look as if any trains are running apart from London Overground. Once we got to 1545 there weren't enough drivers to keep the minimum service levels required in place QPK - E+C so the 12/13 trains we had left running were put away, with a 2 train shuttle operating QPK - H+W via Kilburn High Road, just as a bit of a token effort I think really to say something was running. I would say the update at 1222 was actually as a result of the one under, which was then resolved and on the move shortly afterwards. I guess they just wanted to get the strike action message out early.
|
|
|
Post by jacks on Feb 22, 2020 16:07:49 GMT
I know the posters in stations were warning of no or little service all weekend, but is that going to be the case? Looking at the times that Train Ops had been asked not to book on between, it's now been four hours since the first 'half' of the strike ended, but the TfL website still shows no service in the core section.
I have no knowledge of how staggered the book on times are for Train Ops on the Bakerloo, but perhaps someone here could shed some light?
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Feb 22, 2020 21:15:16 GMT
I know the posters in stations were warning of no or little service all weekend, but is that going to be the case? Looking at the times that Train Ops had been asked not to book on between, it's now been four hours since the first 'half' of the strike ended, but the TfL website still shows no service in the core section. I have no knowledge of how staggered the book on times are for Train Ops on the Bakerloo, but perhaps someone here could shed some light? Skeleton service (roughly 4tph) started operating around 4pm today after various positioning moves had been completed, IRRC that is usually the tail end of a changeover although of course today is not ordinary working. As of 9PM, it looks like the Bakerloo proper only has alternate cancellations.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 23, 2020 16:25:22 GMT
I saw this on Twitter this morning, whoever wrote it seems to think that ASLEF have sorted out all the issues that RMT are striking about Really hurts to say it, but in more than one respect that notice might as well read as an advertisement for cabless trains.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 23, 2020 19:10:48 GMT
You need to read TfL's own feasibility study of 2014 on the possibility of "cabless trains". Page 29 says... Installing PEDs would mean rebuilding almost every platform on the Tube. "Cabless trains" and driverless operation are a fantasy. content.tfl.gov.uk/ntfl-feasibility-report.pdf
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 23, 2020 19:39:20 GMT
You need to read TfL's own feasibility study of 2014 on the possibility of "cabless trains". Page 29 says... Installing PEDs would mean rebuilding almost every platform on the Tube. "Cabless trains" and driverless operation are a fantasy. content.tfl.gov.uk/ntfl-feasibility-report.pdfYet they're not a fantasy as we already have them on the DLR, running underground without PEDs, and with essentially the same signalling system as we already have on two LU lines with more going the same way. Don't get me wrong this is in no way something I'd like to see, and I'm firmly of the opinion that a skilled well-trained human is better than ATO, however if we continue to see elements of the driving cadre carry on as though they're the God of the railway then sooner or later someone is going to bite the bullet and decide to go for it on LU. There's a certain irony that part of the Bakerloo issue seems to revolve around operational incidents, presumably SPADs, so clearly the drivers on there aren't quite as holier-than-thou than is being made out. I don't mean this to be interpreted as a rant, however the tone of that bulletin really grates me, specifically the first two paragraphs! To be fair the rest of it is quite reasonable. Drivers are an important link in the chain which delivers a railway service, but they’re not the only one.
|
|
|
Post by skimpotflyer on Feb 23, 2020 20:35:23 GMT
Looks like they kept up the core service until 15:45 then switched to Queen's Park to Harrow & Wealdstone although from Trackernet it doesn't look as if any trains are running apart from London Overground. Once we got to 1545 there weren't enough drivers to keep the minimum service levels required in place QPK - E+C so the 12/13 trains we had left running were put away, with a 2 train shuttle operating QPK - H+W via Kilburn High Road, just as a bit of a token effort I think really to say something was running. I would say the update at 1222 was actually as a result of the one under, which was then resolved and on the move shortly afterwards. I guess they just wanted to get the strike action message out early. I assume you meant Kilburn Park? It’d be very unusual to see a Bakerloo train in the platform at Kilburn High Road!
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Feb 23, 2020 20:38:53 GMT
No crossover to reverse trains at Kilburn Park, but Kilburn High Road has one.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Feb 23, 2020 20:48:44 GMT
Booked rusty rail moves, and frequently used to facilitate a shuttle service to Harrow as it is generally easier than reversing via the sheds (north or south) at Queen’s Park.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Feb 23, 2020 20:56:08 GMT
Booked rusty rail moves, and frequently used to facilitate a shuttle service to Harrow as it is generally easier than reversing via the sheds (north or south) at Queen’s Park. Do trains run empty between Queens Park and Kilburn High Road ?
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Feb 23, 2020 20:58:45 GMT
Once we got to 1545 there weren't enough drivers to keep the minimum service levels required in place QPK - E+C so the 12/13 trains we had left running were put away, with a 2 train shuttle operating QPK - H+W via Kilburn High Road, just as a bit of a token effort I think really to say something was running. I would say the update at 1222 was actually as a result of the one under, which was then resolved and on the move shortly afterwards. I guess they just wanted to get the strike action message out early. I assume you meant Kilburn Park? It’d be very unusual to see a Bakerloo train in the platform at Kilburn High Road! Here you go.
|
|
|
Post by dpr on Feb 23, 2020 21:36:12 GMT
Booked rusty rail moves, and frequently used to facilitate a shuttle service to Harrow as it is generally easier than reversing via the sheds (north or south) at Queen’s Park. Do trains run empty between Queens Park and Kilburn High Road ? They do indeed. They tip out pfm 1 QPK before running down to KHR to reverse.
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Feb 23, 2020 21:41:31 GMT
Booked rusty rail moves, and frequently used to facilitate a shuttle service to Harrow as it is generally easier than reversing via the sheds (north or south) at Queen’s Park. Do trains run empty between Queens Park and Kilburn High Road ? Yes, passenger trains doing this move tip out/re-enter service at Queens Park. You used to also need a 2nd member of staff to confirm that wrong road starter WS 17 at Kilburn High Rd has cleared as it was unarmed for several years.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 24, 2020 7:28:50 GMT
You need to read TfL's own feasibility study of 2014 on the possibility of "cabless trains". Page 29 says... Installing PEDs would mean rebuilding almost every platform on the Tube. "Cabless trains" and driverless operation are a fantasy. content.tfl.gov.uk/ntfl-feasibility-report.pdfYet they're not a fantasy as we already have them on the DLR, running underground without PEDs, and with essentially the same signalling system as we already have on two LU lines with more going the same way. Don't get me wrong this is in no way something I'd like to see, and I'm firmly of the opinion that a skilled well-trained human is better than ATO, however if we continue to see elements of the driving cadre carry on as though they're the God of the railway then sooner or later someone is going to bite the bullet and decide to go for it on LU. There's a certain irony that part of the Bakerloo issue seems to revolve around operational incidents, presumably SPADs, so clearly the drivers on there aren't quite as holier-than-thou than is being made out. I don't mean this to be interpreted as a rant, however the tone of that bulletin really grates me, specifically the first two paragraphs! To be fair the rest of it is quite reasonable. Drivers are an important link in the chain which delivers a railway service, but they’re not the only one. Regardless of how the DLR operates on sub surface sections TfL's own conclusion was that driverless operation on the Tube would require PEDs. To retrofit PEDs almost all the existing platforms would have to be rebuilt, either by closing individual platforms while still running a service or by closing down whole sections for months, both of which would cause massive disruption. We're not talking years, we're talking decades. Given TfL's current financial state that isn't going to happen any time soon, especially when they're already committed to the Bakerloo Line extension and they're struggling to raise cash for Crossrail 2 which probably won't even start construction until the 2030s. Given where the current strike is its rather ironic that the feasibility study states the Bakerloo wouldn't be getting PEDs and given the statement that driverless operation would only be possible with them then the obvious conclusion is that it would continue to be driver operated. Obviously they wouldn't be able to fit PEDs north of Queen's Park and didn't consider it economically viable to have driverless operation on the rest of the line. In addition the Piccadilly would be driver operated between Rayner's Lane and Uxbridge. Finally TfL conceded that PEDs couldn't be installed until all the old stock on the Piccadilly, Central and Waterloo & City lines had been replaced and that until the PEDs were fitted the new trains would have to be driver-operated. So the only way that driverless operation could be achieved would be to negotiate with the unions to get the drivers to agree to train on the new stock or be prepared to shut down entire lines for years while the work was carried out. That is why talk about "cabless trains" are a fantasy no matter what "elements of the driving cadre" do and if TfL are ever going to "bite the bullet" it won't be until after Crossrail 2 has been built at the very earliest. Not that driverless operation would make the Tube strike-free as some like to claim, when RMT called a strike on the DLR in November 2015 there was no service for 48 hours apart from one train staffed by managers running a shuttle service between Canning Town and Custom House.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Feb 24, 2020 12:21:36 GMT
We are just threatening veer off topic here....
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 24, 2020 20:42:42 GMT
Yet they're not a fantasy as we already have them on the DLR, running underground without PEDs, and with essentially the same signalling system as we already have on two LU lines with more going the same way. Don't get me wrong this is in no way something I'd like to see, and I'm firmly of the opinion that a skilled well-trained human is better than ATO, however if we continue to see elements of the driving cadre carry on as though they're the God of the railway then sooner or later someone is going to bite the bullet and decide to go for it on LU. There's a certain irony that part of the Bakerloo issue seems to revolve around operational incidents, presumably SPADs, so clearly the drivers on there aren't quite as holier-than-thou than is being made out. I don't mean this to be interpreted as a rant, however the tone of that bulletin really grates me, specifically the first two paragraphs! To be fair the rest of it is quite reasonable. Drivers are an important link in the chain which delivers a railway service, but they’re not the only one. Regardless of how the DLR operates on sub surface sections TfL's own conclusion was that driverless operation on the Tube would require PEDs. To retrofit PEDs almost all the existing platforms would have to be rebuilt, either by closing individual platforms while still running a service or by closing down whole sections for months, both of which would cause massive disruption. We're not talking years, we're talking decades. Given TfL's current financial state that isn't going to happen any time soon, especially when they're already committed to the Bakerloo Line extension and they're struggling to raise cash for Crossrail 2 which probably won't even start construction until the 2030s. Acknowledging that we're off-topic. The experience of Paris Metro has some bearing on the conversion. Line 1 took five to six years, from 2007, with the PEDs installed from 2009 to 2011. However, much of the work on the stations was altering the platform height (for level boarding) and reinforcement, not installation of the PEDs themselves. The full switch over was dependent on the final changeover of rolling stock. Line 4 is under conversion at the moment, with many stations having the PEDs fitted, work on the ground started in 2018 and the full automatic operation should be running by the end of 2022. There are pictures online showing the installation of the PEDs being done piece by piece, without the station being closed for most of the work. Of course, the Bakerloo is the one line where automation is always going to be very hard, unless any extended line is operationally split at Queens Park.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 25, 2020 11:11:17 GMT
Regardless of how the DLR operates on sub surface sections TfL's own conclusion was that driverless operation on the Tube would require PEDs. To retrofit PEDs almost all the existing platforms would have to be rebuilt, either by closing individual platforms while still running a service or by closing down whole sections for months, both of which would cause massive disruption. We're not talking years, we're talking decades. Given TfL's current financial state that isn't going to happen any time soon, especially when they're already committed to the Bakerloo Line extension and they're struggling to raise cash for Crossrail 2 which probably won't even start construction until the 2030s. Acknowledging that we're off-topic. The experience of Paris Metro has some bearing on the conversion. Line 1 took five to six years, from 2007, with the PEDs installed from 2009 to 2011. However, much of the work on the stations was altering the platform height (for level boarding) and reinforcement, not installation of the PEDs themselves. The full switch over was dependent on the final changeover of rolling stock. Line 4 is under conversion at the moment, with many stations having the PEDs fitted, work on the ground started in 2018 and the full automatic operation should be running by the end of 2022. There are pictures online showing the installation of the PEDs being done piece by piece, without the station being closed for most of the work. Of course, the Bakerloo is the one line where automation is always going to be very hard, unless any extended line is operationally split at Queens Park. Off topic but Paris is very different from London. For starters the Metro's management negotiated a deal with UNSA where drivers on lines being automated are displaced to other lines and in Paris the government subsidises public transport. Our government has cut TfL's subsidy and Tube management have the negotiating skills of a drunken wildebeest (see current dispute as an example). Page 29 and 30 of the TfL feasibility study "evaluated both full height Platform Edge Doors (PEDs) as installed on parts of the Jubilee line, and half height Passenger Safety Gates (PSGs) as installed on Paris Line 1, and concluded that full-height PEDs offer the best solution". I'm pretty sure that all Tube platforms have recesses under the edge with "nosing stones" over the top, I doubt if they could support the weight of PEDs On Line 1 the driverless MP05 and the driver-operated MP89CC had identical door spacing so the PSGs were installed before the MP05s entered service in November 2011. The same system is being used on Line 4 where the MP89CCs from Line 1 replaced the MP59s. When the "New Tube for London" (hopefully to be renamed) replaces the 1972s, 1973s and 1992s the door spacing will be completely different (two sets of double doors per car). PEDs couldn't be installed until after the old stock was replaced and until installation was complete the NTfL would have to be driver-operated. Plus the problems with automation on the Bakerloo would also apply to the Richmond and Wimbledon branches of the District Line and from Harrow-on-the-Hill to Amersham on the Metropolitan Line. In short any suggestion that by going on strike drivers on the Bakerloo (or anywhere else) are hastening the introduction of driverless trains and their own demise is somewhat fanciful.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 25, 2020 11:19:29 GMT
There is more discussion in this post and its surrounding posts regarding the practical issues with installing PEDs on platforms not designed for them. Perhaps it would be a good idea to have a dedicated thread about this issue as it seems to come up periodically.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 25, 2020 11:49:03 GMT
Or we could just agree that these strikes will have little or no influence on when/if the Tube goes driverless
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 25, 2020 12:14:09 GMT
I fully agree with you on the impact of these strikes, but while PEDs are a prerequisite for driverless operation, that is not the only reason why they might be (suggested to be) installed.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 28, 2020 1:57:35 GMT
Acknowledging that we're off-topic. The experience of Paris Metro has some bearing on the conversion. Line 1 took five to six years, from 2007, with the PEDs installed from 2009 to 2011. However, much of the work on the stations was altering the platform height (for level boarding) and reinforcement, not installation of the PEDs themselves. The full switch over was dependent on the final changeover of rolling stock. Line 4 is under conversion at the moment, with many stations having the PEDs fitted, work on the ground started in 2018 and the full automatic operation should be running by the end of 2022. There are pictures online showing the installation of the PEDs being done piece by piece, without the station being closed for most of the work. Of course, the Bakerloo is the one line where automation is always going to be very hard, unless any extended line is operationally split at Queens Park. Off topic but Paris is very different from London. For starters the Metro's management negotiated a deal with UNSA where drivers on lines being automated are displaced to other lines and in Paris the government subsidises public transport. Our government has cut TfL's subsidy and Tube management have the negotiating skills of a drunken wildebeest (see current dispute as an example). This is the main difference between Paris and London. And in Paris, the time consuming part of the conversion was the reinforcement of the platforms to take the half-height gates, not the actual fitment. Surely that's the same as any scheme in London would be, the NTfL will replace the existing stock, PEDs could then be installed before introduction/conversion of fully automated trains, if that decision is made. This is the method being used for the Glasgow Subway (where I believe there is also a platform overhang at many locations), with the new Stadler units being delivered as Driver operated, before automation is added. The MP89s were produced both as crew-operated (MP89CC on line 1 then line 4) and automated (MP89CA on line 14) versions and there is no reason that the CC sets couldn't be converted to automation, but in the intervening time plans changed to cascade the CC stock. Oh I quite agree, hence being off-topic and I agree that there should probably be a separate topic somewhere for this discussion. Automation will be easier to apply to several of the other tube lines, maybe starting with a pilot on the Waterloo and City. One area where automation could have a use, on the Bakerloo, is automated reversing in the sidings at Queen's Park, Stonebridge Park and maybe Harrow (although the last two might be more difficult, with the access to the reversing sidings being Network Rail controlled).
|
|
|
Post by skimpotflyer on Mar 1, 2020 12:51:01 GMT
Do trains run empty between Queens Park and Kilburn High Road ? They do indeed. They tip out pfm 1 QPK before running down to KHR to reverse. Thanks for the photos! The guy in the jeans in the second photo does appear to be musing ‘what is THAT doing HERE?’ I never knew tube trains can sometimes be seen at stations not on the tube map, even if not in public service
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Mar 1, 2020 12:52:39 GMT
I never knew tube trains can sometimes be seen at stations not on the tube map, even if not in public service You've never been to the Isle of Wight then!
|
|