|
Post by johnlinford on Apr 6, 2022 16:36:25 GMT
As far as I understand it, TfL’s own risk assessments (I believe forced on them by the unions) now require staff to wear ear defenders on some routes.
For customers the theory is that they only experience it briefly each day and so it doesn’t exceed any relevant action thresholds. HSE have a nifty calculator for this but the truth is it’s complicated - if I was having to assess someone’s noise exposure at work I would have to include their total noise exposure so including commute and other work.
Regarding the accuracy of the iPhone for sound monitoring I have compared several of the cheaper apps (around the £15 mark) with calibrated meters costing orders of magnitude more; in general they fail to detect low frequency and cap out around 95dB SPL - more than accurate enough to tell you that something is wrong or concerning. My automated app regularly triggers warnings for 90 or 95dB on the Jubilee line. I catch it rarely enough not to worry, but TfL certainly need to monitor this and protect their staff and arguably customers to comply with sections 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act, and the Noise at Work Regulations.
|
|
|
Post by roman80 on Apr 6, 2022 19:22:45 GMT
Having travelled at least four weekdays a week during 2020 and 2021 on the jubilee between Westminster or Green Park and Canary Wharf, i can say the sound levels between London Bridge and Canary Wharf seemed to rise after last December, particularly between Canada Water and Canary Wharf. Similar to an earlier post, I’ve also changed my headwear. Have gone from in-ear automatic noise cancelling (anc) ones to over ear anc headphones.
|
|
|
Post by alpinejohn on Apr 6, 2022 21:35:13 GMT
A quick and presumably relatively cheap fix for this would be to simply halve the programmed CBTC target speeds in all the noisy sections.
As they say "beware what you wish for!"
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Apr 6, 2022 21:44:46 GMT
Have they even tried to ameliorate the problem by adding something sound absorbent to the tunnel walls?
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Apr 6, 2022 22:25:18 GMT
I clocked 105db between Stratford and Leyton EB. Its no wonder why there are quite a few drivers failing the medical with hearing problems. Several have already been fitted with hearing aids. That's one of the worse bits! When I commute, I have to do that when I come back. Again, this is the sections with the tunnel 'scream'. I did in fact write to TfL but they just replied back saying they are committed to the passengers safety etc.. It's noisy in the first half of the tunnel but the ride quality is now sublime, very smooth. I remember 10 years ago you would get thrown left/right if you were standing at the end of a car. As a trade off it's now dead quiet when the train exits the tunnel, that used to be pretty loud not too long ago.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Apr 6, 2022 22:38:44 GMT
Have they even tried to ameliorate the problem by adding something sound absorbent to the tunnel walls? Some tunnels used to have absorbent sheeting - the Northern line in the Hampstead area was one. However, the absorbent material was also hazardous (it was Asbestos).
|
|
|
Post by antharro on Apr 7, 2022 1:51:52 GMT
I've always found the Jubilee between Waterloo and Canary Wharf, and the Northern going northbound from Balham to be particularly bad. I once tried to measure it but it maxes out my phone's mic so I get an inaccurate reading. I did consider contacting TfL but then figured what's the point; I'd just get a template reply in return...
|
|
|
Post by xtmw on Apr 8, 2022 10:51:42 GMT
That's one of the worse bits! When I commute, I have to do that when I come back. Again, this is the sections with the tunnel 'scream'. I did in fact write to TfL but they just replied back saying they are committed to the passengers safety etc.. It's noisy in the first half of the tunnel but the ride quality is now sublime, very smooth. I remember 10 years ago you would get thrown left/right if you were standing at the end of a car. As a trade off it's now dead quiet when the train exits the tunnel, that used to be pretty loud not too long ago. Yes, I do seem to remember that very loud noise as it exited the tunnel, thankfully that has gone!! Not sure if that has something to do with track maintenance though
|
|
|
Post by bpk on Apr 15, 2022 21:18:25 GMT
Some areas like Holland Park - Notting Hill Gate have seen noise levels improve with rail grinding.
The union passed on a message saying there is a schedule for removing Pandrol Vanguard, but I'm not sure if this applies to all sections where it is currently installed.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Apr 22, 2022 10:40:54 GMT
A quick and presumably relatively cheap fix for this would be to simply halve the programmed CBTC target speeds in all the noisy sections. As they say "beware what you wish for!" Where this was done (albeit not CBTC and not because of track noise) was on the westbound entry to the tunnels shortly after leaving Leyton station. Previously when an accelerating train which also took advantage of the descent entered the tunnel it would be going fast enough to make one's ears go 'pop' because of the changes to the air pressure. I miss this!
|
|
|
Post by xtmw on May 21, 2022 10:00:45 GMT
Update; I wrote to TfL (once again), they rail grinded the loudest sections on the Underground not too long ago. No doubt this effect will wear off in a few months.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on May 21, 2022 13:39:43 GMT
Whether they have rail ground or not, most of the Central line between Shepherds Bush and St Paul’s was appalling yesterday.
|
|
londoner
thinking on '73 stock
Posts: 480
|
Post by londoner on May 28, 2022 17:00:47 GMT
Southbound between St John's Wood and Baker Street on the Jubilee Line is terrible.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Sept 27, 2022 16:54:47 GMT
<<Post merged from 'Tube Noise/quiet sections' thread within General Questions and Comments - goldenarrow>>
Just after our family acquired a TV, Granada had a weekly programme "All our yesterdays", featuring cinema newsreels from 25 years previously (i.e 1935-6-7). One item covered, interesting to a young railway enthusiast, was the innovation of "Quiet Sections" on LPTB railways, c 1936, and featured a car of what I subsequently thought was probably 1935 stock, and a handsome couple shouting [because of ambient tube noise] sweet nothings to each other, and suddenly entering a quiet section to the general amusement of other passengers. I've never found this clip again. What became of these revolutionary quiet sections? Has anyone studied what comprises tube noise? A journey out to zone 6 on the Central Line today got me thinking about this - in the tunnel section, apart from track noise (rail/conductor rail joints?), wheel screech, general rattles seemingly emanating from the bogies, there was a squeal and boom from a higher level and from the doors; also a pump of some kind underfloor. Noise in the open sections was much more tolerable, as you would expect, because it could dissipate easily. Conversation was impossible in the tunnels; and this may be age-related, either per the stock or per the passenger - and not very easy on some of the open sections. Is it time to re-invent quiet sections?
|
|
|
Post by xtmw on Sept 27, 2022 18:45:57 GMT
Didn't RMT do action short of a strike, driving in manual mode on ATO lines at reduced speeds to reduce tunnel noise? Would this be a possibility as the sections on the Central line are very very loud
|
|
|
Post by johnlinford on Sept 27, 2022 19:57:40 GMT
The Jubilee is worse.
Believe RMT won the battle and staff are now issued with PPE for noise control. While obviously PPE is at the bottom of control measures for risk management at work it is an acceptable short term mitigation while better solutions for these problems can be found - rolling stock with better insulation, replacing clips and perhaps track, etc. Passengers are afforded no such duty of care (though I could see some interesting cases arising, though they drift off topic...).
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Sept 27, 2022 20:07:36 GMT
Many ideas have been trialed over the years. Sections of the eastern Central Line extensions had a platform level shelf in the running tunnels to keep noise low. In more recent times this was removed due to high asbestos content.
|
|
|
Post by xtmw on Sept 27, 2022 21:46:09 GMT
The Jubilee is worse. Believe RMT won the battle and staff are now issued with PPE for noise control. While obviously PPE is at the bottom of control measures for risk management at work it is an acceptable short term mitigation while better solutions for these problems can be found - rolling stock with better insulation, replacing clips and perhaps track, etc. Passengers are afforded no such duty of care (though I could see some interesting cases arising, though they drift off topic...). I have noticed several sections re railed, with new clips, areas being grinned, but the eastern section was grinded in April. (Epping - Loughton points), isn't rail grinding supposed to make the ride smoother (correct me if I'm wrong), but has anyone noticed this area is extremely bouncy?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Sept 27, 2022 23:04:55 GMT
Grinding won't make the ride smoother - it reprofiles the rails to eliminate conditions such as Rolling Contact Fatigue and Gauge Corner Cracking, both of which if left untreated can lead to sudden catastrophic rail failures with associated risk of derailment - think Hatfield which was as a result of untreated Gauge Corner Cracking. The solution for a smoother ride may be additional tamping to consolidate the existing ballast under the sleepers, reballasting, or, depending on the ballast condition, complete renewal; but not grinding.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Sept 28, 2022 8:30:38 GMT
In the merged thread, I wasn't referring just to *track* noise as does the thread you've merged it into, but also boom from tunnels (is it different eg with steel and concrete), wind/air pressure, and motor/brake system sounds. Is one sort of tube tock noisier than another, for instance? Is the quiet sections clip on the net, does anyone know? I couldn't find it.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Sept 28, 2022 8:44:53 GMT
Grinding won't make the ride smoother - it reprofiles the rails to eliminate conditions such as Rolling Contact Fatigue and Gauge Corner Cracking, both of which if left untreated can lead to sudden catastrophic rail failures with associated risk of derailment - think Hatfield which was as a result of untreated Gauge Corner Cracking. The solution for a smoother ride may be additional tamping to consolidate the existing ballast under the sleepers, reballasting, or, depending on the ballast condition, complete renewal; but not grinding. Thanks for this explanation. I've noticed people mentioning grinding in relation to both increasing and decreasing rail noise, so it's good to get a definitive answer to a question I kept meaning to ask.
|
|
|
Post by xtmw on Sept 28, 2022 10:25:48 GMT
Grinding won't make the ride smoother - it reprofiles the rails to eliminate conditions such as Rolling Contact Fatigue and Gauge Corner Cracking, both of which if left untreated can lead to sudden catastrophic rail failures with associated risk of derailment - think Hatfield which was as a result of untreated Gauge Corner Cracking. The solution for a smoother ride may be additional tamping to consolidate the existing ballast under the sleepers, reballasting, or, depending on the ballast condition, complete renewal; but not grinding. Thanks for this explanation. I've noticed people mentioning grinding in relation to both increasing and decreasing rail noise, so it's good to get a definitive answer to a question I kept meaning to ask. Personally, from my experience, it's better to hear grinder rails then the loud noises in the tunnel... I've noticed bullhead rail is still used underground, do they install this still or are they changing all the bullhead areas to Pandrol clips?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Sept 28, 2022 12:48:25 GMT
I've noticed people mentioning grinding in relation to both increasing and decreasing rail noise, so it's good to get a definitive answer to a question I kept meaning to ask. The two are related - rail wear and specific patterns of wear (corrugation) are known to increase rail noise, and as grinding returns the rails back to their correct profile, it does have a role to play in reducing rail noise. It is, however, only a temporary solution as with time as the rails become worn again. There is of course a different sound from freshly-ground rails, which is quite distinct. I've noticed bullhead rail is still used underground, do they install this still or are they changing all the bullhead areas to Pandrol clips? The longer-term aim is to phase out bullhead rail but there are some sites which needed to retain it around Points and Crossings, mainly due to the flexibility advantage that bullhead has over flat bottom. Recently a new design of switch rails has been developed which give a flat bottom switch in a bullhead footprint, and I expect these will be used to eliminate the remaining Bullhead P&C sites with time. When it comes to plain track I can only surmise that the remaining bullhead sections are so because they have not yet been renewed.
|
|
|
Post by jonathanburg on Feb 9, 2023 9:44:56 GMT
I'm wondering what accounts for the 'long noise' where approaching and receding noise comes through into buildings and above ground (like tubes running above Haverstock or Chalk Farm).
We had a lot of track underpinning (ongoing) but noise occurs in both directions so is it really just a simple case of a rail issue ? e.g. would both tracks be slipping at the same time?
The crew working on it didn't seem surprised to hear its noisy,
The 2021 train noise recordings show a high level (104ish) dB which matches my own platform measurements.
If corrugation is the cause, you'd expect to easily notice differences between the tracks, unless both corrugate at the same rate.
I can't help wondering if the source noise is one thing, but its being amplified by the tunnel for some reason, but that some other effect causes that to wax and wane. As the overall effect, which nobody can explain so far, is the slowness at which noise appears and goes away. e.g. you might get noise for 1-2 days, it hits a crescendo and then drops entirely away for some time - hours or days - then creeps up again over a few hours
This week I observed Monday PM to Tuesday AM very noisy indoors and outside, Tues 2-7 it got a lot quieter and when visiting Wednesday 3-4, it was near silence.....which won't last. The onset or disappearance of the noise is almost like throwing a switch....you can hear it ramp up or ramp down quite markedly within a few trains. It happens in both directions together usually.
Could the tunnel be changing its ability to contain sound, or some kind of air or groundwater effect be in play? Are there routines to check to find out if pumps, vent or other mechanical job is coinciding with when it changes?
Passing trains also vibrate paving on chalk farm road quite strongly and thump bass under the Roundhouse which you can hear on its ground floor when its not thumping a gig - or when it is :-D.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Feb 9, 2023 17:45:11 GMT
Interesting info. I wonder whether it's been passed to the TfL/LUL specialists.
|
|
|
Post by cudsn15 on Feb 10, 2023 8:56:12 GMT
I live above the points on the northbound approach to Seven Sisters and yes - it can be exactly as Jonathanburg has described above. There doesn't appear to be any rhyme or reason as to why some days the noise of the trains below are louder than others. Today (10th February 08:30) they are particularly loud.
To add - I have lived here since the last days of the 67 stock. You could barely hear them. 09TS was louder but not excessively so. When the timetable changed to majority through running to Walthamstow there was a substantial increase in noise - the trains run at full speed over the points to Platform 3 but reduce to a much slower approach to Platform 4 for the Seven Sisters Terminators.
A year or so ago there was a speed restriction on the points meaning all trains were slowed on the approach and for a month or two it was blissfully quiet. Just prior to this restriction the sound was the worst I have known it with the house noticeably shaking - so clearly there was a fault with the track/points then.
I'm not complaining - I knew about the trains when I bought the property and it's a trade off for living so close I can be on the platform within 2 minutes of leaving the house - but it's a pity that over the years the noise has got worse due to change of stock and timetable patterns. I did worry when "night tube" came about that my sleep would be affected but the trains are so in-frequent that it wasn't a problem in the end.
In short I would say the quality of all factors of the track and points do affect the noise but why there are such marked differences within hours of each other is a mystery. Temperature may have a bearing perhaps but it would be impossible to keep tunnels at consistently the same perfect temperature 24/7.
I am guessing current rolling stock is heavier than the ones of the past and this also affects the infrastructure beneath the wheels - but overall speed is probably the main issue. you can either have optimum speed for reducing sound issues or optimum speed for timetable operation. it would be a miracle if they both could be the same. (I didn't notice any issues with the timetable when they reduced the approach speed to Seven Sisters the other year!) and of course each tunnel and even sections of tunnel have their own unique profile which affects overall sound harmonics which can amplify any given sound due to that particular set of characteristics at that location so again to have a constantly changing speed profile adjusting to short sections of tunnel is also impractical.
I must also add that NR recently replaced the overground track through the station on the viaduct and over the road bridge. You can barely hear the overground trains at all now - even the late night expresses that get diverted through 7 sisters instead of the Lea Valley line barely register now whereas before the house would shake as they passed. So good track and ballast is definitely key.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 10, 2023 14:22:29 GMT
I have noticed on the Central EB, noise leaving Stratford has lessened, but as you get nearer the tunnel mouth to Leyton, it has got worse........
|
|
|
Post by jonathanburg on Feb 10, 2023 22:00:50 GMT
Interesting info. I wonder whether it's been passed to the TfL/LUL specialists. Customer service suggest so, but I don't think they communicate with technical folk 100% well, if so it will be a partial story in/partial diagnosis out. Another thought is whether track lubrication systems fire on a set schedule or simply need to oil things a little more often.
|
|
|
Post by cudsn15 on Feb 11, 2023 9:09:36 GMT
For the record - today (Saturday 09:00) can barely hear Victoria line trains below me. no explanation why they were so loud about the same time yesterday and not today...
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Feb 11, 2023 10:03:49 GMT
For the record - today (Saturday 09:00) can barely hear Victoria line trains below me. no explanation why they were so loud about the same time yesterday and not today... Just a guess. See if you can determine if noise level is related to headways - does it occur when trains are bunched ? If you not staff then you won't have trackernet, but traintimes.org.uk/map/tube/might help 0900 yesterday is peak, 0900 today is not. Sound transmission varies with air pressure. Bunched trains may alter pressure in the tunnels. So whatever noise thee is maybe transmitted differently. Just a theory.
|
|