|
Post by brigham on Jan 22, 2019 8:53:39 GMT
All this technology to keep the guard out of a job. It's perfectly clear that the driver is next to go. If you can do your job by watching TV screens, it doesn't make any difference if you are on the train, or in some office miles away. Ask any unemployed level-crossing keeper.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Jan 22, 2019 10:22:59 GMT
No - at least while they are operated on the national rail network (remember the ELL from Dalton to New Cross is owned by TfL not NR) Please remember that despite all the branding / marketing the London Overground is an integral part of our national rail network 99% of which does not have any form of CSDE fitted despite employing trains with automatic doors which are basically no different from the 345s for decades. There is very little difference whether it is a 345 with its doors opened on the wrong side a 455 at Sutton, a 313 at Worthing or even a 170 at Grantham - a person falling out of them is highly likely to suffer death or injury (being hit by a 100mph LNER express is just as fatal as being electrocuted on conductor rails) There are some places where Selective Door Opperation (SDO) beacons can also provide CSDE information as an add on so to speak - but if no SDO is required and the trains are still driven manually (as opposed to Automatic Train Opperation (ATO) as found on the Thameslink core) then no beacon will be fitted. And before people get all upset about it, if CSDE is desired to be fitted to the national rail network then that applies just as well to Salford, Saltcross or Salisbury as it does to Stratford. This is relevant in so much as the amount of money it takes to retro fit such a system to the mainline fleet of trains, many of which have no provision for said equipment plus installing beacon infrastructure across the country would be enormous. There's a rather valuable point you've missed, SDO is enabled on modern stock at all stations, on Bombardier stock this started on the 375/377 fleets and on everything since. Now as SDO is GPS based it uses a signal from GPS to work out where it is and then opens doors to a set length based on its database. While it is true that modern stock does have the potential for CSDE to be fitted, that is not the case for the likes of the 455, 321, 319, 156, 150, etc fleets of EMUs / DMUs built by British Rail. Yes some of these are being replaced by new stock CDSE capable but plenty are not - and as I said, I don't see why London is such a special case. If CSDE is deemed necessary at Stratford then it is also required at the likes of Birmingham International, Doncaster or Cardiff Central.
As you also correctly noted however, the fixed infrastructure needed on track is also not exactly cheap or easy to install - particularly at stations where space is tight.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Jan 22, 2019 18:08:11 GMT
All this technology to keep the guard out of a job. It's perfectly clear that the driver is next to go. If you can do your job by watching TV screens, it doesn't make any difference if you are on the train, or in some office miles away. Ask any unemployed level-crossing keeper. I'm sure I must have said this before but as yet there are no "mainline" driverless services although Australia, China and Japan are experimenting while SNCF were predicting they'd have driverless services on the TGV by 2023. We have plenty of driverless "metro" lines but only two - Nuremburg U-2 (2010) and Paris M-1 (2011) - have been converted from driver-operated with two more - Glasgow Subway (2020) and Paris M-4 (2022) - in the process of being converted. By the time all trains are automated anyone currently working as a train driver will either be retired or in their grave.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 22, 2019 21:21:27 GMT
While a train driver may be able to do the routine parts of their job from an office miles away, until trains are 100% reliable and isolated from all external influences (humans, animals, weather, vegetation) there will always be a need for a member of staff to be on-board or within a few minutes travel (by other means) from any point where the train can be.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Jan 23, 2019 8:41:24 GMT
While a train driver may be able to do the routine parts of their job from an office miles away, until trains are 100% reliable and isolated from all external influences (humans, animals, weather, vegetation) there will always be a need for a member of staff to be on-board or within a few minutes travel (by other means) from any point where the train can be. There will certainly be a need. Whether or not there will be a member of staff is another matter.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Jan 23, 2019 8:44:37 GMT
"...By the time all trains are automated anyone currently working as a train driver will either be retired or in their grave." There IS life after our generation, remember.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 23, 2019 10:23:52 GMT
While it is true that modern stock does have the potential for CSDE to be fitted, that is not the case for the likes of the 455, 321, 319, 156, 150, etc fleets of EMUs / DMUs built by British Rail. Yes some of these are being replaced by new stock CDSE capable but plenty are not - and as I said, I don't see why London is such a special case. If CSDE is deemed necessary at Stratford then it is also required at the likes of Birmingham International, Doncaster or Cardiff Central. As you also correctly noted however, the fixed infrastructure needed on track is also not exactly cheap or easy to install - particularly at stations where space is tight. London isn't special case but simply got the stock required to allow the function to be introduced. Are you saying we shouldn't upgrade safety features unless the whole country can? While Stratford isn't a special case but its a busy station with 42.3m using it in 2016-17. That's 0.1m behind Birmingham New Street for the same period. (Cardiff is 12.5m for the record) so the numbers plus newer stock is driving the case for it. Remember the SDO on the Desiro UK (350/450 series) doesn't have the same tech as the 37x counterparts so its not possible at Birmingham or indeed Cardiff. With the new fleet some of these features will be able to be rolled out (not sure on the spec for some of the new units) so these features will roll out. Of course it requires millions more to be spent on infrastructure works.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 23, 2019 10:51:26 GMT
All this technology to keep the guard out of a job. It's perfectly clear that the driver is next to go. If you can do your job by watching TV screens, it doesn't make any difference if you are on the train, or in some office miles away. Ask any unemployed level-crossing keeper. Sorry but comparing the level crossing keeper to a driver is fool hardly. A level crossing is a fixed point that's easier to check the two sides of the road with simple equipment, although that is not fool proof and its an ongoing development even for unmanned crossing. However there remains the need to have sight of many crossing which may be remote but local control will still exist in some form. As for driverless trains, well that's a completely different matter. You need complete awareness 100% of the time of not just the track in front of you but also what's coming up ahead. Yes we have the technology to move trains on railway lines but at present its about the ability of a computer to see and work out any issues and we simply are not there yet. Even with all the computer power on the train now it's not powerful enough to do all the hard work. Then there is dealing with human behaviour that don't follow patterns and is hard to predict, think school kids messing about on the platform, small animals. Human's struggle to work out what is going to happen let alone a less powerful computer so how the hell do you think the train will magically work things out? It's also worth noting that with ATO and automatic trains, a human is still required to have his hands on the brakes as they system cannot see any issues, they are simple follow the curve on a chart pre-loaded onto the system. Now I raise the point of after an incident such as people jumping in front of trains, objects blown onto the line. These can happen away from stations and take the emergency response some time to reach the scene. You need someone who is trained in the system to take control, check the train and alert the rest of the railway. Oh and deal with the passengers. Therefore even if we sorted all the issues of computers not being powerful enough to see threats, managed to shrink it down to fit underneath a train (currently anything like that would be bigger than a 12 car train), we still need a staff member on board with the knowledge and therefore will not lead to jobless. It will of course lead to major changes to the role but not the removal of someone from the train. As present there is no expectation of doing away with a human up front on the national network despite our ability to run trains automatically because the actual issues are too big to sort out. Remember Moore's Law that said technology power doubles every 18 months has now ended after some 40 odd years of growth as the shrinking of technology now meets reality of atoms and the new way forward is building multiples means we won't fit the tech to trains anytime soon. With this, I wouldn't be surprised if we are in the same situation at the start of the new century. Crossrail manages ATO only by separating passengers from the track with no infrastructure interactions. Thameslink has many level crossings (off the top of my head I think there is around 30), add in various foot crossing that aren't manned. To get around this is going to require billions to be spent to remove these (one example, Mitcham Eastfields has a level crossing through the middle of it and would require a tunnel to fix the issue causing a rebuild of the station to achieve). There are far more valuable things to be spending money on in the years ahead and it won't come quickly or easy.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Jan 23, 2019 11:17:54 GMT
I thought that Thameslink trains driven in the 'core' with ATO already automatically release the doors when the train has come to a stop in the platform- or soon will?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 23, 2019 17:39:41 GMT
We have drifted into discussing several different topics, all of which have been covered elsewhere. Things directly related to the door incident only please.
|
|
|
Post by sunnyday on Jan 23, 2019 19:48:22 GMT
The cab on those class 345 trains looks like a cockpit; it isn't like the driver can open his door and put 'one foot on the platform' as could be done on an Underground train. When the 345s were first introduced, they were programmed to open all doors at Stratford. For a few weeks it was necessary to open the cab door, confirm you were on the correct side and then release the doors.
|
|
|
Post by sunnyday on Jan 23, 2019 19:49:53 GMT
The cab on those class 345 trains looks like a cockpit; it isn't like the driver can open his door and put 'one foot on the platform' as could be done on an Underground train. Why does the driver need to exit a cab where there is live video of the train side for him to view? At Stratford it is fully CD/RA so there is no video broadcast into the cab (the monitors remain blank). Same at Liverpool Street and Shenfield.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 23, 2019 20:16:47 GMT
Why does the driver need to exit a cab where there is live video of the train side for him to view? At Stratford it is fully CD/RA so there is no video broadcast into the cab (the monitors remain blank). Same at Liverpool Street and Shenfield. CD/RA (presumably) refers to indicators on the platform. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that these are illuminated by dispatch staff: CD (Close Doors) indicates that passengers have finished boarding and alighting and the doors can be closed; then RA (Right Away?) displays to show that the station duties are complete and the train can depart. I don't know how the latter integrates with the signalling though.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jan 23, 2019 20:24:51 GMT
At Stratford it is fully CD/RA so there is no video broadcast into the cab (the monitors remain blank). Same at Liverpool Street and Shenfield. CD/RA (presumably) refers to indicators on the platform. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that these are illuminated by dispatch staff: CD (Close Doors) indicates that passengers have finished boarding and alighting and the doors can be closed; then RA (Right Away?) displays to show that the station duties are complete and the train can depart. I don't know how the latter integrates with the signalling though. Correct, see here for examples: www.railsigns.uk/sect20page1/sect20page1.htmlMy understanding is that RA can only illuminate when the associated signal is showing a proceed aspect. I would assume for ATO-type signalling there is a similar interlock.
|
|
|
Post by sunnyday on Jan 23, 2019 20:57:34 GMT
At Stratford it is fully CD/RA so there is no video broadcast into the cab (the monitors remain blank). Same at Liverpool Street and Shenfield. CD/RA (presumably) refers to indicators on the platform. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that these are illuminated by dispatch staff: CD (Close Doors) indicates that passengers have finished boarding and alighting and the doors can be closed; then RA (Right Away?) displays to show that the station duties are complete and the train can depart. I don't know how the latter integrates with the signalling though. That's correct. To clarify P5 and P8 which TfL Rail uses are CD/RA. P9 and P10 usually have platform dispatch staff using batons and P10a is self dispatch using platform monitors. No platforms are equipped with the system to transmit images into the cab.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 23, 2019 21:55:54 GMT
CD/RA (presumably) refers to indicators on the platform. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that these are illuminated by dispatch staff: CD (Close Doors) indicates that passengers have finished boarding and alighting and the doors can be closed; then RA (Right Away?) displays to show that the station duties are complete and the train can depart. I don't know how the latter integrates with the signalling though. Correct, see here for examples: www.railsigns.uk/sect20page1/sect20page1.htmlMy understanding is that RA can only illuminate when the associated signal is showing a proceed aspect. I would assume for ATO-type signalling there is a similar interlock. No you can on signals I've dispatched from have RA on a red. It will only clear tho after a signal goes back. CD is not linked to the signalling however and is a simple light box.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 23, 2019 21:58:25 GMT
Why does the driver need to exit a cab where there is live video of the train side for him to view? At Stratford it is fully CD/RA so there is no video broadcast into the cab (the monitors remain blank). Same at Liverpool Street and Shenfield. The doors opening will operate the in cab cameras regardless of it they are used for dispatch so my point stands. Unless TfL have asked Bombardier to disable the camera feed for some unknown reason but that's not a safe method of working.
|
|
|
Post by sunnyday on Jan 23, 2019 22:25:15 GMT
At Stratford it is fully CD/RA so there is no video broadcast into the cab (the monitors remain blank). Same at Liverpool Street and Shenfield. The doors opening will operate the in cab cameras regardless of it they are used for dispatch so my point stands. Unless TfL have asked Bombardier to disable the camera feed for some unknown reason but that's not a safe method of working. They definitely don't and never have at Liverpool Street, Stratford or Shenfield. The monitors remain blank at those stations regardless of whether the doors are released or not and there is no way to get an image of the platform at those stations.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 23, 2019 23:01:36 GMT
The doors opening will operate the in cab cameras regardless of it they are used for dispatch so my point stands. Unless TfL have asked Bombardier to disable the camera feed for some unknown reason but that's not a safe method of working. They definitely don't and never have at Liverpool Street, Stratford or Shenfield. The monitors remain blank at those stations regardless of whether the doors are released or not and there is no way to get an image of the platform at those stations. Must be a software mod as every other modern unit with DOO cameras have them active. Very strange way to work as there no way a driver can check his train despite him remaining in charge despite being dispatched.
|
|
|
Post by xplaistow on Jan 24, 2019 0:31:17 GMT
They definitely don't and never have at Liverpool Street, Stratford or Shenfield. The monitors remain blank at those stations regardless of whether the doors are released or not and there is no way to get an image of the platform at those stations. Must be a software mod as every other modern unit with DOO cameras have them active. Very strange way to work as there no way a driver can check his train despite him remaining in charge despite being dispatched. 345s actually do not have DOO cameras as they take images from platform mounted cameras instead. This choice was made because of the use of PEDs in the core which would render train mounted cameras almost useless. As such, I assume that the lack of images at certain stations means that those stations are not fitted with cameras.
|
|
|
Post by sunnyday on Jan 24, 2019 7:34:17 GMT
Must be a software mod as every other modern unit with DOO cameras have them active. Very strange way to work as there no way a driver can check his train despite him remaining in charge despite being dispatched. 345s actually do not have DOO cameras as they take images from platform mounted cameras instead. This choice was made because of the use of PEDs in the core which would render train mounted cameras almost useless. As such, I assume that the lack of images at certain stations means that those stations are not fitted with cameras. That's correct. The leaky feed system which transmits images from the platform to the train is not fitted at certain stations, including Stratford.
|
|
|
Post by beingcharley on Jan 24, 2019 22:45:31 GMT
They definitely don't and never have at Liverpool Street, Stratford or Shenfield. The monitors remain blank at those stations regardless of whether the doors are released or not and there is no way to get an image of the platform at those stations. Must be a software mod as every other modern unit with DOO cameras have them active. Very strange way to work as there no way a driver can check his train despite him remaining in charge despite being dispatched. Can drivers not also be female or non-binary?
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Jan 25, 2019 0:01:38 GMT
All this technology to keep the guard out of a job. It's perfectly clear that the driver is next to go. If you can do your job by watching TV screens, it doesn't make any difference if you are on the train, or in some office miles away. Ask any unemployed level-crossing keeper. Actually makes a huge difference, imagine sitting at a tv screen watching it for eight hours a day, just waiting for the once a year when something goes wrong, not many people would have that level of concentration On top of that the alternative systems would either have one person per platform or train, or people watching multiple platforms and either causing delays while being available to watch departures or monitoring multiple departures at the same time
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Jan 25, 2019 8:56:58 GMT
Must be a software mod as every other modern unit with DOO cameras have them active. Very strange way to work as there no way a driver can check his train despite him remaining in charge despite being dispatched. Can drivers not also be female or non-binary? I'm not sure about 'non-binary', but I can't remember there being any gender restriction on LU drivers.
|
|
|
Post by beingcharley on Jan 25, 2019 15:38:30 GMT
Can drivers not also be female or non-binary? I'm not sure about 'non-binary', but I can't remember there being any gender restriction on LU drivers. Quite correct. But that is at odds with the statement of fleetline. I am interested in why they feel anyone other than those using male pronouns could not be a driver?
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Jan 25, 2019 18:10:12 GMT
I'm interested to know why someone would pretend not to understand the meaning of fleetline's perfectly ordinary and everyday contribution to a railway-related thread on a railway based forum. It's my guess that we have the grammatically self-obsessed equivalent of a vegan, who just 'has to let everyone know'. What a bore.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jan 25, 2019 18:15:37 GMT
Can we desist from personal attacks, please.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 27, 2019 17:07:54 GMT
Must be a software mod as every other modern unit with DOO cameras have them active. Very strange way to work as there no way a driver can check his train despite him remaining in charge despite being dispatched. 345s actually do not have DOO cameras as they take images from platform mounted cameras instead. This choice was made because of the use of PEDs in the core which would render train mounted cameras almost useless. As such, I assume that the lack of images at certain stations means that those stations are not fitted with cameras. Apologises as I deal with Bombardier stock built in the last two decades I had thought the 345s were like everything else Bombardier has built for the mainline (and funny enough since the 345s) have DOO cameras. However the idea that PEDs mean you can't use DOO cameras seems a reason only for a few stations. I also believe then that the 345s are the first attempt to put the LU standard on the national network. It does however in light of recent incidents that a driver has no images of a platform seem to be at odds of how everyone else works. On the mainline the driver still retains responsibility for his train and is supposed to use cameras to check his train as he starts to take power. Most stock the cameras stays on until 3mph (historically units have a hard time telling the difference between 0 and 3mph). Are the staff on the platforms at Stratford LU/TfL Rail or GA staff?
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jan 27, 2019 17:14:41 GMT
I'm not sure about 'non-binary', but I can't remember there being any gender restriction on LU drivers. Quite correct. But that is at odds with the statement of fleetline. I am interested in why they feel anyone other than those using male pronouns could not be a driver? Actually your assuming my words excludes anyone else and assumes someone giving an opinion about being sat in a particular situation is the only way to see things. Such views are rather narrow and in force an opinion (of discrimination) rather than trying to establish the reasoning behind them. As you do not know me personally, should you not ask for an explanation rather than making assumption based in your own fears and not the truth?
|
|
|
Post by beingcharley on Jan 27, 2019 17:22:05 GMT
Quite correct. But that is at odds with the statement of fleetline . I am interested in why they feel anyone other than those using male pronouns could not be a driver? Actually your assuming my words excludes anyone else and assumes someone giving an opinion about being sat in a particular situation is the only way to see things. Such views are rather narrow and in force an opinion (of discrimination) rather than trying to establish the reasoning behind them. As you do not know me personally, should you not ask for an explanation rather than making assumption based in your own fears and not the truth? You've clearly used gendered pronouns when there is absolutely no need to. It's you who has the narrow mind! 🙄
|
|