Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2020 14:03:05 GMT
Yes, keeping a permanent boundary at preston Road implies a permanent worsening of the run time for fast and semi-fast trains between Harrow and Finchley Road or Wembley Park in both directions. Not exactly helpful! Re the D78 RAT trains, they'd still need ATC to get from/to Neasden depot even if the boundary was the SMA8 one at Preston Road unless a descope involved retention of tripcock operation capability. You may find it does not go beyond SMA7 so there will be no further work north of Finchley Road
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Jun 11, 2020 14:33:08 GMT
A lot of the equipment appears to have been installed north of Finchley Rd.
How much of the cost of bringing into use is the installing and how much the things after, testing etc.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jun 11, 2020 15:21:03 GMT
A lot of the equipment appears to have been installed north of Finchley Rd. How much of the cost of bringing into use is the installing and how much the things after, testing etc. I’m not sure there’s that much installation out towards the Amersham end, certainly the last of the SERs are barely complete. Presumably there’s also a fair bit of development still needed on the inter-running sections. With the comments made elsewhere about the undesirability of a migration boundary at Preston Road, it would appear logical simply to stick with Finchley Road. This does of course overlook any issues with the legacy signalling, and in particular the cost-effectiveness of keeping it going. Others will no doubt be able to comment more, however Finchley Road to Uxbridge (excluding Harrow to Wembley) seems to date from the 80s, whereas north of Harrow is 1950s. I can well see how we would be coming to the point where expenditure would be required. My sources seem to be of the opinion that it would probably be more worthwhile simply to stick with the CBTC, but subject to the money actually being forthcoming to do that. Worst case is do nothing, which presumably would ultimately lead to running with a high rate of failures. In any case this is all a little way into the future, as presumably completing the circle would be first priority, not least as this offers the greatest benefit in terms of performance uplift.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2020 15:32:00 GMT
Most of the issues with the legacy signalling on both Met and Dist is the transformers and cabing.
Alot of it is still 1950’s vintage and for sure requires replacing.
|
|
|
Post by underover on Jun 11, 2020 15:49:13 GMT
I know fitment of the two D78 rail adhesion trains has been paused for the moment. That's partially Covid related - one of the trains was at Ruislip to be fitted when project work ceased. There is now a plan to arrange for the two trains to be swapped over at a suitable time to enable fitment of the the second D78 RAT first. Yes, only because the other train is not in a fit state to run so will be swapped under a concession. Issue with heights on the train.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Jun 11, 2020 16:17:41 GMT
Ah, perhaps the de-scoping scope continues to be developed. Finchley Road would be more sensible since all trains stop there. Looking forward to clarity but not holding my breath!!!
If there is a lot of descoping, then a point on the bright side would be that the excellent wheel spin/slip control on S stock will continue to give real benefit in the de-scoped areas where the signalling doesn't care about slip!
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 11, 2020 17:47:03 GMT
Yes, only because the other train is not in a fit state to run so will be swapped under a concession. Issue with heights on the train. Yes, I was aware of the reason. Having the Senior Project Manager concerned in the same team has its advantages...
|
|
|
Post by roman80 on Jun 12, 2020 8:23:09 GMT
Stopping at SMA8 leaves all Met fast line trains stopping to change to/from tripcock opposite Preston Road platforms without assistance when trouble, so not sustainable long term. Leaving SMA12 to Wimbledon leaves Earls Court Control Centre open indefinitely just to let trains in and out of Parsons Green sidings, see districtdavesforum.co.uk/post/486329/thread and responses. In the Parsons Green and Earls Court Control Centre situation, defining a SMA12lite to finish between Fulham Broadway and Putney Bridge may make more sense? Earls Court Control Centre can be closed, no separate panel at Parsons Green as a redmediation, takes out old signalling TFL needs to maintain until the National Rail signal interface at Putney/Putney Bridge.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 12, 2020 8:46:03 GMT
That would be my view too, but remains to be seen.
As the boundary is mid-way between stations there probably would be a need to retain three existing signals to maintain signalling headway, but these could be retained as auto signals and monitored by CTBC.
|
|
jimbo
Posts: 1,914
Member is Online
|
Post by jimbo on Jun 12, 2020 18:45:12 GMT
Stopping at SMA8 leaves all Met fast line trains stopping to change to/from tripcock opposite Preston Road platforms without assistance when trouble, so not sustainable long term. Leaving SMA12 to Wimbledon leaves Earls Court Control Centre open indefinitely just to let trains in and out of Parsons Green sidings, see districtdavesforum.co.uk/post/486329/thread and responses. In the Parsons Green and Earls Court Control Centre situation, defining a SMA12lite to finish between Fulham Broadway and Putney Bridge may make more sense? Earls Court Control Centre can be closed, no separate panel at Parsons Green as a redmediation, takes out old signalling TFL needs to maintain until the National Rail signal interface at Putney/Putney Bridge. The entire 4LM may one day be completed, but money is tight for now and even Parsons Green would cost a shed-load. I think the short-term way out would be to add it to the Griffin Rooms alongside the current Barons Court to Ealing Broadway, especially since the Uxbridge branch may move there also. The Picc was moved surprisingly cheaply. Of course, this does not update anything on the track or interlockings, only the remote control stuff.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 12, 2020 21:52:05 GMT
That's one of the problems with the suggestion to do a PICU on Parsons Green. The vital signalling is now sixty years old - twenty years longer than its design life. It has been rewired once already, and the outside cabling is in a poor condition - like many similar cables of the same vintage.
It's not logical to put it into the Griffin Rooms - it would then be an island rather than an integrated part of the Piccadilly line.
And yes- the Picc was relocated surprisingly cheaply - mainly because the PICU project made a very deliberate decision not to remove any of the equipment they made redundant, but instead leave that to the full Piccadilly Line Upgrade to resolve. Naturally that decision was made at a time before Emergency Budgets were even a remote possibility, but it means we have rooms often half-full of redundant equipment which will remain in situ for many more years to come.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Jun 13, 2020 12:00:36 GMT
it means we have rooms often half-full of redundant equipment which will remain in situ for many more years to come. Which I imagine is great from a museum curator's point of view, but not so much from the point of view of those operating and maintaining an operational railway.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jun 13, 2020 13:07:37 GMT
it means we have rooms often half-full of redundant equipment which will remain in situ for many more years to come. Which I imagine is great from a museum curator's point of view, but not so much from the point of view of those operating and maintaining an operational railway. Well, it’s not like Cobourg Street has been re-used for anything! The Vic Line desks I believe found their way to a museum as did parts of the illuminated diagram, but apart from that the room looks just the same today as it did the night it was closed.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 13, 2020 15:32:33 GMT
I think Chris M has hit the nail on the head. Cobourg Street, whilst not reused for anything, is no longer a working installation. The Piccadilly Line is, and shouldn't be full of redundant kit.
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Jun 13, 2020 17:21:17 GMT
Which I imagine is great from a museum curator's point of view, but not so much from the point of view of those operating and maintaining an operational railway. Well, it’s not like Cobourg Street has been re-used for anything! The Vic Line desks I believe found their way to a museum as did parts of the illuminated diagram, but apart from that the room looks just the same today as it did the night it was closed. The Coburg Street building houses a very important ventilation shaft for the Victoria line. It's not just the time expired equipment and cabling on the track. Old equipment rooms have air conditioning that needs to be maintained.
|
|
jimbo
Posts: 1,914
Member is Online
|
Post by jimbo on Jun 13, 2020 22:05:58 GMT
it means we have rooms often half-full of redundant equipment which will remain in situ for many more years to come. Which I imagine is great from a museum curator's point of view, but not so much from the point of view of those operating and maintaining an operational railway. Parsons Green is a good example, with the calling on signal remaining until almost fifty years after peak coupling to 8-car trains was abandoned! Have the Jubilee and Northern line lost all their redundant signalling yet?
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Jun 13, 2020 22:08:30 GMT
Which I imagine is great from a museum curator's point of view, but not so much from the point of view of those operating and maintaining an operational railway. Parsons Green is a good example, with the calling on signal remaining until almost fifty years after peak coupling to 8-car trains was abandoned! Have the Jubilee and Northern line lost all their redundant signalling yet? Still plenty of locations on both lines where redundant equipment and signage is still in situ. Some instances are unorthodox to say the least! From FB group Bakerloo & Jubilee Lines Past & Present
|
|
jimbo
Posts: 1,914
Member is Online
|
Post by jimbo on Jun 15, 2020 1:47:35 GMT
When I think of the new signals out to Moor Park, I am somehow reminded of the red-X signals, with a yellow diamond backing plate, that were fitted all around the Circle line for the original planned OPO with C stock. They were never commissioned!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2020 8:01:20 GMT
Emergency stop lights.
Some of them are still around but not commissioned with the plungers on the platforms
|
|
|
Post by nig on Jun 15, 2020 9:15:58 GMT
At cockfosters there is a siding (3 if you include the 2 in depot ) that still have lights changed on the shunt signals and fixed red lights not sure if they maintain points as well but they havent been used in over 2o years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2020 17:36:26 GMT
At cockfosters there is a siding (3 if you include the 2 in depot ) that still have lights changed on the shunt signals and fixed red lights not sure if they maintain points as well but they havent been used in over 2o years. Got a picture?
|
|
|
Post by nig on Jun 15, 2020 19:10:04 GMT
At cockfosters there is a siding (3 if you include the 2 in depot ) that still have lights changed on the shunt signals and fixed red lights not sure if they maintain points as well but they havent been used in over 2o years. Got a picture? I will try to get some on thursday
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jun 15, 2020 19:32:41 GMT
Still plenty of locations on both lines where redundant equipment and signage is still in situ. Some instances are unorthodox to say the least! From FB group Bakerloo & Jubilee Lines Past & Present oh my, that looks, erm, 'good'. Just three white lights, no coloured lights. (is there an 'evil grin' emoticon?) I wonder if that could still work, if so it could be put to good use - for instance on Hallowe'en. Ghost of the dead signals coming back to haunt everyone on the one day when our culture says that hauntings are permitted and even expected.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Jun 15, 2020 19:59:22 GMT
Back to CBTC please, folks...
|
|
|
Post by tarq on Jun 29, 2020 11:37:34 GMT
New SMA 3 go live date is the weekend of 25th & 26th July 2020 (operational proving weekend 30th & 31st May 2020). As we’ve seen many times already, these dates are not guaranteed! Any update on SMA3?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 29, 2020 14:31:11 GMT
New SMA 3 go live date is the weekend of 25th & 26th July 2020 (operational proving weekend 30th & 31st May 2020). As we’ve seen many times already, these dates are not guaranteed! Any update on SMA3? With the Covid-19 restrictions and delay, July won't be happening. I would unwrap your 2021 diary and have that ready for SMA 3.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2020 17:30:58 GMT
Easter 2021 we are hearing
|
|
|
Post by underover on Jun 29, 2020 18:01:50 GMT
I keep seeing it mentioned that they may cut back how much of the SSR network ends up being converted to CBTC. Does it have any truth to it?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 29, 2020 18:16:13 GMT
I keep seeing it mentioned that they may cut back how much of the SSR network ends up being converted to CBTC. Does it have any truth to it? Yes, and you will find the answers and discussion on page 33: districtdavesforum.co.uk/post/492750
|
|
|
Post by underover on Jul 4, 2020 17:41:07 GMT
I keep seeing it mentioned that they may cut back how much of the SSR network ends up being converted to CBTC. Does it have any truth to it? Yes, and you will find the answers and discussion on page 33: districtdavesforum.co.uk/post/492750Sorry, me being lazy.
|
|