|
Post by piccadillypilot on Jun 28, 2005 14:37:28 GMT
When was EDO in operation? I'm guessing mid 60's. I don't know when it was fitted but it was certainly there in the late seventies, until the units were transferred to the Northern.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2005 18:08:54 GMT
You see all sorts of funny and disgusting stuff up this end, people using Trains as Toliets, Playgrounds, Bedrooms (I'm not going to say what for because of the younger members on this forum) and so on. Those sort of things are daily occurances system wide, not just up the east end of the district line.
|
|
|
Post by Christopher J on Jun 28, 2005 19:17:54 GMT
You see all sorts of funny and disgusting stuff up this end, people using Trains as Toliets, Playgrounds, Bedrooms (I'm not going to say what for because of the younger members on this forum) and so on. Those sort of things are daily occurances system wide, not just up the east end of the district line. I'll agree to that. I remember over hearing a conversation on a D78 where a man got on a District Line service somewhere up east and group of Chavs got on at the next and started pulling the armrests out of the seats and using them as weapons. IIRC it was behaviour like this which got the armrests on the Bakerloo 72TS removed. (Can anybody imagine a D78 with no armrests? )
|
|
|
Post by banana on Jun 28, 2005 20:40:58 GMT
as he was doing things "blind" reading a book while working. . Why would anyone "cover" for a person doing a safety critical job so recklessly. Shameful. I'm breaking the rules with a naughty word shameful.
|
|
|
Post by Christopher J on Jun 28, 2005 22:10:06 GMT
Another thing that annoys me about the passengers customers that use LUL is their walking pace. Some of them walk up stairs and though the station hallways at a snails pace causing blockades in the passages behind them. It would be interesting to see some of these people running for their lives, they can't pick up their pace on the tube, well lets see them try and run from a great big Bear or Lion chasing them. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jun 29, 2005 1:53:15 GMT
Why would anyone "cover" for a person doing a safety critical job so recklessly. Shameful. f**king shameful. I'm sure Q8 would agree - you have to take this story in the context of the 1960's, when 'safety critical' wasn't invented. Though well before I was even thought of by my parents, i've heard many, many stories of goings on in the 60's 70's and early 80's, that in todays world would result in 75% of LUL's workforce being sacked on the spot every day.
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Jun 29, 2005 2:22:09 GMT
Why would anyone "cover" for a person doing a safety critical job so recklessly.
Shameful.
f**king shameful.
I'm sure Q8 would agree - you have to take this story in the context of the 1960's, when 'safety critical' wasn't invented. Though well before I was even thought of by my parents, i've heard many, many stories of goings on in the 60's 70's and early 80's, that in todays world would result in 75% of LUL's workforce being sacked on the spot every day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Colin and you are correct. I have seen things done on the underground that would make a modern days manager or safety rep hair go white or give them a heart attack.
A lot of things then were done with the FULL KNOWLEDGE of management as it made the railway run better AND more efficiently than today. It was only when things went cockeyed that trouble started.
As for "covering" well in those days everybody else on the tube was a "Mate" and someone to be respected and helped when in bother. A bit like the army squaddies really. None of this I'm-all-right-Jack of today.
|
|
|
Post by banana on Jun 29, 2005 7:26:13 GMT
Carry on justifying it, hope it makes you feel better. What pride you must have taken in your job.
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jun 29, 2005 7:51:03 GMT
Carry on justifying it, hope it makes you feel better. What pride you must have taken in your job. I don't think they actually felt bad to feel better. And why shouldn't they take pride in their job? They did it and did it well.
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Jun 29, 2005 8:06:40 GMT
Carry on justifying it, hope it makes you feel better. What pride you must have taken in your job. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please young man there is no need for sarcasm.
|
|
|
Post by piccadillypilot on Jun 29, 2005 9:06:29 GMT
Carry on justifying it, hope it makes you feel better. What pride you must have taken in your job. There are some people who made efforts to do the job properly, took a pride in doing so and refused to accept poor workiing. For some of those people life was made uncomfortable so that they left and others were sacked. The culture has since changed so that we now have a major delays and passengers suffering when minor problems arise. Neither situation is healthy and attempting to berate people for working within the culture prevailing several decades ago is pointless. If posters wish to start slating other people please go to uk.transport.london where afficiandos of the sport will be found.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 29, 2005 9:38:13 GMT
I'm sure Q8 would agree - you have to take this story in the context of the 1960's, when 'safety critical' wasn't invented. Though well before I was even thought of by my parents, i've heard many, many stories of goings on in the 60's 70's and early 80's, that in todays world would result in 75% of LUL's workforce being sacked on the spot every day. I remember one or two similar occurances in the early noughties...
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 30, 2005 12:57:17 GMT
Don't tell me there isn't a single current employee on this forum who hasn't covered for a workmate at some time. The degree might be different from Q8 in the sixties but once you establish the principle that you have done it, the severity is all down to niceties.
|
|
|
Post by piccadillypilot on Jun 30, 2005 14:06:31 GMT
Getting down to the technicalities of Q8's sad story and the Guards supposed failure to do the job properly.
I can say from experience that when stood on the guard's gangway of a 59 stock at Holborn Piccadilly eastbound it's not possible to see beyond the next car due to the curvature of the platform.
The practice amongst many guards was to walk across to the platform wall to get a better sight of the train. When it was clear one returned to the gangway and closed the doors. Whilst doing that there is time for a person to run on the platform and dive between the doors. It happend to me more than once.
Given the story as described the guard's failings on that occasion become irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by banana on Jun 30, 2005 16:32:36 GMT
The practice amongst many guards was to walk across to the platform wall to get a better sight of the train. When it was clear one returned to the gangway and closed the doors. Whilst doing that there is time for a person to run on the platform and dive between the doors. It happend to me more than once. Whilst not wanting to dwell on the issue I'd thought that after closing the doors a further check from the platform wall would be in order.
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Jun 30, 2005 16:50:25 GMT
The practice amongst many guards was to walk across to the platform wall to get a better sight of the train. When it was clear one returned to the gangway and closed the doors. Whilst doing that there is time for a person to run on the platform and dive between the doors. It happend to me more than once. Whilst not wanting to dwell on the issue I'd thought that after closing the doors a further check from the platform wall would be in order. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Blimey lad if you did that you'd be back and forth like a condom all day long and never leave the station!!
|
|
|
Post by piccadillypilot on Jun 30, 2005 17:32:06 GMT
Whilst not wanting to dwell on the issue I'd thought that after closing the doors a further check from the platform wall would be in order. Indeed one could, but then there'd be people whinging about the delay and what's more even stood by the wall one still can't see the front of the platform. This is where good station staff are worth their weight. I did once hear a story of a Guard who was given a rollocking for closing the doors as passengers were running for the train. Thereafter he complied with the instruction until one evening peak he was at Green Park for twenty minutes. The delay has probably been over egged with each telling, but I'm quite prepared to believe that he was there for an extended period because, again, I've been in the situation of having people get upset when I've closed the doors in their face.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jun 30, 2005 23:34:52 GMT
At the end of the day, it happened 30+ years ago. I'd like to think even the poor victim would look back and laugh at what happened. As this technology and Gaurds are not in use now, I think everyone should chill out and read the story for what it is, a humourus tale. nothing more, nothing less.
|
|
|
Post by banana on Jul 1, 2005 0:10:56 GMT
At the end of the day, it happened 30+ years ago. I'd like to think even the poor victim would look back and laugh at what happened. As this technology and Gaurds are not in use now, I think everyone should chill out and read the story for what it is, a humourus tale. nothing more, nothing less. Whilst trying to understand you point of view and the points you raise I'm sure the victim isn't laughing at it. But to use a few phrases from Blair and the Irqa war. Let's "move on", "draw a line under it" etc. etc. Let's hope those Iraqis are laughing in 30+ years!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2005 0:58:42 GMT
As a passenger I'm grateful that things are not the same now than in the sixties. At the same time as a boarding passenger I only board a train if it is safe to do so. If I get caught up in a crowd and I am not comfortable I just let everyone get on with it - most times there's another train behind anyway. I don't look to staff for my safety - I look for it myself. Jumping on trains at the last split second is not something I would do, and it is sensible not to do it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2005 1:01:12 GMT
In the last post I am not condoning any 'corner cutting' of working practice - If getting a train away from a station takes 10 minutes or 10 seconds it is justifiable if no -one is injured or killed when they may have been. I am just saying I look out for me - and that's a bit of risk taken away.
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Jul 2, 2005 2:03:54 GMT
Damn right Alex. The trouble is that everybody else is looking out for themselves in a different way.
|
|