Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2013 11:51:17 GMT
Could someone please shed some light on train detection systems on the Bakerloo. Was it the case with the '80's resignalling that Delta systems were incompatible with the JTC's and therefore the sole system of train detection installed was the Electro-Mechanical Treadle type? Secondly, were some of the Treadles replaced with electromagnetic head 'Position Detector' type devices at some point? And finally, in the Queen's Park area today, is it a mixed system of Treadle/Position Detector that is in operation or is it solely Treadle based. Many thanks in advance for your replies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2013 12:56:40 GMT
The track circuits installed are of the Jointless Track Circuit (JTC Model FS2500) indeed delta position detectors are not compatible so indeed they use the Silec Treadle which is a arm depressed by the train wheel which operates a pair of contacts in the unit. As far as I'm aware the Bakerloo has no position detectors of the newer type be in the Siemens design or the Frauscher Design but I'm not 100% on that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2013 12:56:57 GMT
The track circuits installed are of the Jointless Track Circuit (JTC Model FS2500) indeed delta position detectors are not compatible so indeed they use the Silec Treadle which is a arm depressed by the train wheel which operates a pair of contacts in the unit. As far as I'm aware the Bakerloo has no position detectors of the newer type be in the Siemens design or the Frauscher Design but I'm not 100% on that.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Sept 26, 2013 23:02:11 GMT
The Silec treadles were replaced with Siemens Position Detectors at all sites except Queen's Park in the late 90s/early 2000s. Queen's Park still uses Treadles for all the 'Delta' functions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2013 1:11:18 GMT
So Queen's Park is entirely 'Treadle' with no other type of Position Detector in place at all in the area?
Many thanks DistrictSOM and Tom for your replies - they are much appreciated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2013 3:38:14 GMT
One last question, if I may. In relation to the Silec Treadle, is anyone aware of occurrences where they can fail (to detect a train that has passed) and then pick up again when the train has been moved a short distance but without another set of wheels passing over the arm? Something on the electrical (rather than arm mis-alignment) side, similar to what can happen say when a track circuit drops (for no obvious reason) and then picks up again after a train moves? Once more, many thanks in advance your replies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2013 10:36:49 GMT
Only fault we have experienced of them is when the arm breaks and it fails to detect a train. But the contacts revert to there open position. The arm is slugged by approx 8 secs when depressed by a train before it comes back up
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2013 14:05:31 GMT
Thanks DistrictSOM. If the arm had not stayed 'down' for long enough or something had interfered with the contacts in some way would it cause of lack of detection do you think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2013 19:13:53 GMT
There is always a back up timing section known as a 2nd shot in case they do break. Not 100% on the Bakerloo as Tom was a T/O over there but other lines its used in the release of the signal lever lock in most situations so the signaller would need to take a release on the signal concerned 1 minute for manual releases and 2 minutes for automatic releases. As the 2nd shot system is only used in speed control situations and not releases of signal locks. Again going from memory the treadle is proven to be ok in the signal in the rear of it as its in the selection circuit with the relay proven down first which is fed from the treadle. Another thing we have realised and LU could be causing problems for them selves is that company which makes them states only 24v maximum should go through the contacts but we have 100v going through them, but I've never known one fail due to worn out contacts just the arms wearing or breaking off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2013 2:48:33 GMT
Thanks very much DistrictSOM for the speedy and informative reply.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Sept 29, 2013 21:15:34 GMT
My experience was that they tended to fail mechanically rather than electrically too, and it wasn't uncommon for a number of treadles to all fail around the same time. We fed them at 50v DC and I don't recall any problems with them (I would expect NR to use a similar voltage).
Certainly not all of the treadles at Queen's Park had a second shot timer; from memory the ones in the North Shed specifically were 'one shot' applications.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2013 0:24:08 GMT
Many thanks Tom for your reply. Do I understand 'second shot' correctly in that, should a treadle fail (or there be some failure in the indication), another indication would still be received that the train is in the correct location? And then from there releases would be taken to set the correct route up, say for the northbound platform into the North Sheds for example?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2013 7:23:47 GMT
A second shot is where the treadle does not detect the train for any reason and then its proved via timing sections and track circuits being down for a set amount of time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2013 11:13:30 GMT
Thanks for that DistrictSOM.
|
|