cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Feb 26, 2013 18:43:15 GMT
Good service tonight, and an 8 minute wait between trains again!
|
|
|
Post by stevo on Feb 26, 2013 19:58:46 GMT
Perhaps an addition to the LUL conditions of carriage would remove the need for a train operator to check for passengers at termini as the responsibility for leaving the train at the recognized termini would be entirely shifted to the passenger.
A new clause in LUL’s “Conditions of Carriage”
It is entirely the responsibility of a passenger using LUL services to ensure that he/she leaves the train at or before the point where the train is scheduled to terminate its journey.
Any passenger remaining on a terminated train for longer than 2 minutes after the train has come to a full stop at the terminal point and opened its doors risks being carried – by the now-empty train – into the sidings or depot.
Once an empty train has moved into sidings or depot, the train operator is not permitted, for safety reasons, to approach any person observed to be still on the train. Such a person will be required to remain on the train until it leaves the siding or depot on its return to passenger service.
In the case of an unauthorised person being observed on an empty train not scheduled to return to passenger service within 10 minutes, British Transport Police will be summoned to remove the person from the train after questioning him/her and may well detain him/her on a charge of Trespass.
In an instance of a person refusing to comply with a request by a member of LUL staff to leave a train, police assistance will be summoned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2013 20:02:11 GMT
Good service tonight, and an 8 minute wait between trains again! I'm afraid that's par for the course with the current set up, along with 5-6 trains cancelled throughout most of each day. Hey ho
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2013 20:26:51 GMT
Another slip up around 15:00, waited for an NB train at Edgware Road, first three were up on the DMI as Queens Park trains. First comes in and by George it's going to Stonebridge (yay! ) On arrival at Queens Park however (after being held outside for about five minutes I might add) BB32 was at danger with theatre indication for the sidings. Then had to wait whilst the driver found out what was going on and took a release. The train must have been running about 10 late after that, credit to the driver though for keeping us informed. Thats not the first time either, last week I got on a train described as a Harrow and on arrival at QP the destination was changed to Stonebridge, some banter took place between the previous and the relieving driver to the effect of "eh? I dunno"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2013 3:57:17 GMT
Well said rbisko!
In the period between the removal of detrainment staff and the start of industrial action there were over 3,000 passengers overcarried into sheds/sidings on the Bakerloo....yes, over three-thousand!!!! This caused considerable distress for many of those passengers and sheer unadulterated panic in some, so much so that one one occasion a young boy managed to get himself off the train and very (and I mean VERY) close to electrocution but for the rapid intervention of the Driver!!! And this is before you even get on to the subject of verbal assaults. This dispute is about one thing and one thing only - safety. There is considerable support amongst regular Bakerloo users for this action, so much so that I have not heard of one instance of a driver being taken to task over it by a passenger...and I work on there!!!!
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Feb 27, 2013 8:01:21 GMT
There is considerable support amongst regular Bakerloo users for this action, so much so that I have not heard of one instance of a driver being taken to task over it by a passenger...and I work on there!!!! Obviously not from those rush hour commuters that are left waiting on the platform for 2-3 trains, often with a 6+ minute wait - from what I hear, they are all decidedly unhappy with it... but then, most people would not directly approach a driver anyway.
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Feb 27, 2013 8:04:20 GMT
I'm afraid that's par for the course with the current set up, along with 5-6 trains cancelled throughout most of each day. Hey ho I suppose the PR department won't let them away with broadcasting a message about delays due to Industrial Action then...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2013 9:10:23 GMT
I'm afraid that's par for the course with the current set up, along with 5-6 trains cancelled throughout most of each day. Hey ho I suppose the PR department won't let them away with broadcasting a message about delays due to Industrial Action then... Who knows what goes through the minds of "the great and good"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2013 9:56:15 GMT
Believe you me cso, as a tube employee of many years standing, if a passenger is disgruntled about something they will at least ask about what is going on and in this case this is NOT happening! Quite the reverse!! On platform 3 at Queen's Park I personally have had at least 20 people throughout this dispute say 'we support what you are doing' (something I have very, very rarely heard before from anyone!!) and the 95% of the other 207 drivers on the Bakerloo that are tipping-out have had the much the same. I have even had three separate people asking for the address of 'Customer Services' because they want to write in and complain specifically about LU's questionable attitudes towards their safety!! Give the travelling public a little more credit for being able to see what is ACTUALLY going on!!!
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 27, 2013 19:56:06 GMT
Well said rbisko! In the period between the removal of detrainment staff and the start of industrial action there were over 3,000 passengers overcarried into sheds/sidings on the Bakerloo....yes, over three-thousand!!!! As the Bakerloo is the only line where the regular services, at the northern end of the line, have to reverse in sidings, why the big shock? In the same period, there were nearly 100 passengers overcarried on other lines, nearly all of which reverse the regular service in platforms; the only exceptions I can think of are Seven Sisters on the Victoria, Waterloo on the Waterloo & City, Rayners Lane on the Piccadilly and the Kennington loop (where overcarrying may not even be recognised as there is no reversal). Any worse than the distress and panic when a train is stuck in a tunnel for more than a couple of minutes? Passengers can use the doors to get out of a car at any time and there is nothing life-threatening about passengers going into sidings. A more pertinent question would be how many complaints have there been to LU, rather than to drivers. Personally I never get near enough to the driver to talk to them, when travelling on the Bakerloo (or on any other line).
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Feb 27, 2013 20:22:23 GMT
....As the Bakerloo is the only line where the regular services, at the northern end of the line, have to reverse in sidings, .. Jubilee??? Luckily I saw the big gaps in the Bakerloo last night before committing to it for the middle leg of my journey home. It seems that I now have the choice between a political "Good Service" on a crippled line, or the possibility of arriving at Green Park via the Jubbly and finding the Vic platform stuffed solid (knowing I could have boarded fine at Oxford Circus). Oh Joy!! No argument with the drivers.... all that has been said here seems very sensible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2013 23:51:27 GMT
andy purk 1) Being stuck in a siding (with no obvious means of escape as there is no platform) after a train has been shut down is a great deal more disconcerting for most that are overcarried than being on a train with other passengers 'stuck' in atunnel with the driver making PA's! Come on!! and 2) You, and everyone else now on the Bakerloo have more of a chance than ever to talk to the driver....whilst we are going along the platform detraining!!! Like I said before, twenty plus people have taken this opportunity in tha last five to six weeks to express their support, because they understand what is going on. Compare this to maybe three in the previous 22 years I have been on this job!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 0:02:53 GMT
Any worse than the distress and panic when a train is stuck in a tunnel for more than a couple of minutes? Passengers can use the doors to get out of a car at any time and there is nothing life-threatening about passengers going into sidings. Perhaps you should consider why disptach staff were implemented in the first place. 10 years ago a passenger died after falling from a train at Liverpool Street sidings, the passenger was obviously conscious of the fact no one was on the train and they shouldn't have been in that location At that point they decided to try and leave the train. How often does a passenger leave a train in passenger service because they've been stuck in a tunnel for a few minutes? Of course anyone is free to leave the train at any time, but when a train has been is entering or shut down in a siding they will panic because they realise they shouldn't be there and attempt to get out. If it was deemed necessary for dispatch staff to be implemented in 2002 then why all of a sudden are they not needed?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 0:30:56 GMT
Spot on ajax!!
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 28, 2013 1:40:52 GMT
Any worse than the distress and panic when a train is stuck in a tunnel for more than a couple of minutes? Passengers can use the doors to get out of a car at any time and there is nothing life-threatening about passengers going into sidings. Perhaps you should consider why disptach staff were implemented in the first place. 10 years ago a passenger died after falling from a train at Liverpool Street sidings, the passenger was obviously conscious of the fact no one was on the train and they shouldn't have been in that location At that point they decided to try and leave the train. How often does a passenger leave a train in passenger service because they've been stuck in a tunnel for a few minutes? Of course anyone is free to leave the train at any time, but when a train has been is entering or shut down in a siding they will panic because they realise they shouldn't be there and attempt to get out. If it was deemed necessary for dispatch staff to be implemented in 2002 then why all of a sudden are they not needed? I know about the incident at Liverpool Street, but the person concerned was also drunk, so how clearly they were thinking is open to debate. The trains have supposedly been modified to prevent such an easy exit to the track from the car end doors, so the rules have been changed. The question surely should be how much money should be spent to protect passengers from their own actions; drunk passengers also use the end doors to get from car to car when the train is in motion, should the doors therefore be more securely fastened? I can recall when the end doors on the 1972 Mk II stock were fitted with alarms (during the stock refurbishment), but that the alarms were soon disconnected as the doors were not always closed properly when used (whether by staff walking through or by passengers using them). The trains entering the sidings are not there for long periods of time during reversals, at Harrow, there is normally ten minutes from arrival of northbound and departure south again. At Queens Park, there is really a big difference between a train on one of the through roads, waiting to get onto the Network Rail track or into the platform and a train in one of the center sidings in the north shed?
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 28, 2013 1:46:40 GMT
andy purk 1) Being stuck in a siding (with no obvious means of escape as there is no platform) after a train has been shut down is a great deal more disconcerting for most that are overcarried than being on a train with other passengers 'stuck' in atunnel with the driver making PA's! Come on!! Does Joe Public really know the difference when a train is shutdown or not? The lights don't go out in the cars and the trains don't sound much different whilst the driver is changing ends. 20+ is still a tiny fraction of the numbers who use the line daily and won't include the London Overground passengers stuck behind a Bakerloo service.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 28, 2013 1:56:30 GMT
....As the Bakerloo is the only line where the regular services, at the northern end of the line, have to reverse in sidings, .. Jubilee??? Arrghh, I knew there would be one that I'd missed. Although most of the Jubilee trains reverse at Stanmore in the platforms, with one train in every three to four reversing at Willesden Green or Wembley Park via the sidings.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 2:05:41 GMT
Boy, you really do have a low opinion of your fellow 'Joe Publics' don't you! Four and a half bars of train line air being destroyed on a '72 stock makes plenty of noise!! And even if people haven't heard that, the fact that the train remains motionless with no messages (DVA or human) made and no obvious means of escape is enough to send a good section of folk into a panic. As a driver, I have been there and seen everything from banging on windows to screaming the house down to punters even phoning the Police because they believe they have been left there to rot!! As for the 20 plus, you are doing everything humanly possible to avoid seeing the obvious!! I am counterposing the 20 plus over 5-6 weeks WITH the 3 over 22 years to show you that Joe Public can see that there is a DIFFERENCE between this dispute and others, namely that they are in a safer position because of it!!
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Feb 28, 2013 8:00:22 GMT
As for the 20 plus, you are doing everything humanly possible to avoid seeing the obvious!! I am counterposing the 20 plus over 5-6 weeks WITH the 3 over 22 years to show you that Joe Public can see that there is a DIFFERENCE between this dispute and others, namely that they are in a safer position because of it!! Not wanting to get in to an argument, but you are saying that the industrial action is a good thing because 20 people have said so.. and what about the other 248+ people that are regularly on the Bakerloo Line (and this is just the seated people according to Wikipedia!) who may not think this is a good thing because their service is being delayed? Strangely enough, as I'm sure you're aware, not everyone using a tube train gets on at the starting point and off at the terminus point - so they don't have the chance to speak to you the driver!
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Feb 28, 2013 9:24:34 GMT
As for the 20 plus, you are doing everything humanly possible to avoid seeing the obvious!! I am counterposing the 20 plus over 5-6 weeks WITH the 3 over 22 years to show you that Joe Public can see that there is a DIFFERENCE between this dispute and others, namely that they are in a safer position because of it!! Not wanting to get in to an argument, but you are saying that the industrial action is a good thing because 20 people have said so.. and what about the other 248+ people that are regularly on the Bakerloo Line (and this is just the seated people according to Wikipedia!) who may not think this is a good thing because their service is being delayed? Strangely enough, as I'm sure you're aware, not everyone using a tube train gets on at the starting point and off at the terminus point - so they don't have the chance to speak to you the driver! I think we are beginning to go round in circles on this one now. It's obvious that those at Queen's Park see the problem and some/many/most sympathise and support the t/op - after all they are ALL affected by lack of platform staff.
Equally those who only use the southern end of the line couldn't care less what happens up north and are totally pigged off with delays and cancellation. That's humanity for you.
We've allowed a long run on this one, but, unless someone has something new to add, I think we're through. I'll leave it open for now, but if circular arguments keep appearing one of the mods will pop along to lock it.
Thanks all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 10:01:21 GMT
There are moves afoot to end the delays by the introduction of staff - the SRT so rumour strongly has it - on platforms once more, but this has been 'the word' so for a couple of weeks now. You are right Phil, this is going round in circles, so this will be my last post on the matter before any major change on the ground but I will say once more that a genuinely huge positive has come from this because many, many passengers have been able to see straight through LU's 'operational issues' nonsense! They want a safer railway and so do we.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Feb 28, 2013 21:22:17 GMT
The trains have supposedly been modified to prevent such an easy exit to the track from the car end doors, so the rules have been changed. I think the exact opposite has happened in recent times. Modern trains tend to have pictorial and/or written instructions on getting into the driver's cab, opening the front door, deploying any detrainment ladders/etc that may be fitted, and leaving the train. This certainly wasn't present before
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 8:41:21 GMT
In most metro systems where the trains reverse beyond platforms, there is a narrow platform along the siding to allow the drivers to change ends without walking through the train. Incidentally, this means that the drivers will not be in direct contact with anyone carried beyond the terminus.
Would it be possible to add such a platform at Queens Park, and other commonly used reverse in sidings locations? (I think it is already used at Waterloo on the W&C).
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Mar 1, 2013 10:12:00 GMT
In most metro systems where the trains reverse beyond platforms, there is a narrow platform along the siding to allow the drivers to change ends without walking through the train. Incidentally, this means that the drivers will not be in direct contact with anyone carried beyond the terminus. Would it be possible to add such a platform at Queens Park, and other commonly used reverse in sidings locations? (I think it is already used at Waterloo on the W&C). No there is no space to fit a narrow platform.
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Mar 1, 2013 19:02:25 GMT
In most metro systems where the trains reverse beyond platforms, there is a narrow platform along the siding to allow the drivers to change ends without walking through the train. Incidentally, this means that the drivers will not be in direct contact with anyone carried beyond the terminus. Would it be possible to add such a platform at Queens Park, and other commonly used reverse in sidings locations? (I think it is already used at Waterloo on the W&C). No there is no space to fit a narrow platform. And probably more to the point, why would they spend so much on such provision when the whole idea is cost saving (at any cost)? How many years salary of detaining assistance would such a facility cost?
|
|