|
Post by motorman on May 24, 2013 21:16:08 GMT
Just to clarify was the A Stock delivered using the former Great Central Line, Ashendon Jn to gain GW metals and thus to West Ruislip?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 24, 2013 22:39:07 GMT
and probably a load of risk assessments and method statements..... The C69/77 stock at Neasden is indeed there for scrap Metman, is that a sad face? Surely it should be the other way round, or have you been spending too much time around prjb? But in all seriousness, I think will miss the C stock when they are gone, in spite of what I previously thought. I guess they are just quite characterful in their own way. Indeed. I've spent many years on C stock commuting to the East End and I am fond of them. They are no A stock yet they are built for a purpose, and are 'proper' trains in my view. Westinghouse brakes, PCM and DC motors put them in a class the S stock will never achieve!
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on May 25, 2013 9:07:19 GMT
metmanNot quite I think most if not all were Bletchley-Calvert(facing junction there)-Aylesbury-P.Risborough- W.Ruislip
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2013 14:05:41 GMT
The route used to deliver the A stock had been closed so they had to depart by road. It's possible that the same criteria applies to the C stock. Fraid not. Scrap A stock trains had route clearance to both Rotherham and Eastleigh but the issues with registering the stock and certifying it fit for transit moves on NR metals were never overcome. This is the reason they went by road, albeit that quite a few had already gone by road before the routes were finally cleared. I know that at least for the move south, C stock never had a route cleared. Much of the work had been done but the wider profile gave problems at several locations and the scrap contractors were understandably unwilling to foot the bill for more route clearance for moves that may well not happen. I heard somewhere that the cost of the platform works near Reading was best part of £50K alone, which was effectively wasted money. Throw in the anticipated high utilisation of the 73s and barriers on A stock returns, and the relatively higher cost per car from only having a 6 car train, compared with 8 in the A stock, and movement by road was the only practical option. Also, in fairness to LU, the road movements have worked very satisfactorily for all parties to date.
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 25, 2013 18:05:10 GMT
What's more is that towards they were splitting 4 car units between Rotherham and Eastleigh towards the end of the programme, so that'd be a logistical nightmare (in theory).
|
|
kabsonline
Best SSL Train: S Stock Best Tube Train: 92 Stock
Posts: 686
|
Post by kabsonline on Jun 4, 2013 22:32:21 GMT
Appears the set that was at Neasden recently has now gone to Northwood. Two cars left when I went past there this morning around 12ish
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2013 23:26:36 GMT
Just had a great journey on 5545 about half an hour ago from Kings Cross - Baker Street, driver got to line speed, used full service braking and threw it off at the last second for a smooth stop. It couldn't have been rheo brake because the traction motors were silent during braking and was not westinghouse because there was no air noises, so was just EP. Can the driver isolate the rheo these days? or could it have been a non working rheo brake with EP compensating? either way its impressive how smooth and quickly the C stock can stop with a good driver and brakes.
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on Jun 9, 2013 11:44:43 GMT
Anything to be going to Northwood this week?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 13:07:33 GMT
Anything to be going to Northwood this week? None planned for this week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 16:55:25 GMT
Throw in the anticipated high utilisation of the 73s and barriers on A stock returns, and the relatively higher cost per car from only having a 6 car train, compared with 8 in the A stock, and movement by road was the only practical option. Also, in fairness to LU, the road movements have worked very satisfactorily for all parties to date. I agree about the efficiency of the road movements. Regarding making it worthwhile to transport by rail, why not ship the C stock in 8 car formations or even 10 or 12 cars?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2013 19:54:38 GMT
does anyone know when the next sets of c stock are due to go?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2013 21:20:29 GMT
At the moment, probably in September.
|
|
|
Post by silverfoxcc on Jul 23, 2013 21:26:05 GMT
Anybody on here who might be 'in the know', could advise the best way to get a redundant whistle from the scrappers. would lke to use it on a 5in gauge loco i am building
Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2013 17:37:34 GMT
thanks reganorak..
|
|
|
Post by tel on Aug 27, 2013 17:09:18 GMT
Understand that there a two set of C stock still at Acton Works. Might any one be able to supply their numbers, please?
MTIA Tel
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2013 18:49:40 GMT
Just had a great journey on 5545 about half an hour ago from Kings Cross - Baker Street, driver got to line speed, used full service braking and threw it off at the last second for a smooth stop. It couldn't have been rheo brake because the traction motors were silent during braking and was not westinghouse because there was no air noises, so was just EP. Can the driver isolate the rheo these days? or could it have been a non working rheo brake with EP compensating? either way its impressive how smooth and quickly the C stock can stop with a good driver and brakes. Wonder if C stock can do what 72ts do where you can throw the reverser to neutral or reverse (I cant remember which) which cuts out the rheostatic brake.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Aug 27, 2013 19:35:12 GMT
Travelled on a couple of C stocks today. One with a slow door and the other with a very noisy compressor.
Delayed on the noisy one by an S7 testing on the Circle from Edgware Road to Farringdon.
The S7 towards Barking on the way home showed a big cool difference.
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on Aug 27, 2013 20:34:25 GMT
If it's a two-car set that you're referring to in Acton Works, then it is 5595/6595 (Withdrawn: August 2009). Or do you mean that there are two full sets of stock in Acton? If so, sadly I cannot help.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2013 20:47:45 GMT
The two-car set in Acton was 5595-6595. It left Acton for scrap in July.
|
|
paulsw2
My Train Runs For Those Who Wait Not Wait For Those That Run
Posts: 303
|
Post by paulsw2 on Aug 27, 2013 21:53:49 GMT
i believe 5701-6701 resides at Acton was withdrawn but has not been sent for scrap yet
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2013 22:15:46 GMT
Wonder if C stock can do what 72ts do where you can throw the reverser to neutral or reverse (I cant remember which) which cuts out the rheostatic brake. Had no idea they could do that! bearing in mind that the principles of the stock are essentually the same I'd imagine they can in that case. I was under the impression that when the rheo brake isn't working on a unit, the train just gives EP when the TBC is in rheo/EP positions. 5701 has been donated to a technology college in Greenwich, no idea about 6701 though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2013 22:26:33 GMT
5701 went to Greenwich on 28/6, 6701 went for scrap previous day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2013 23:02:08 GMT
Wonder if C stock can do what 72ts do where you can throw the reverser to neutral or reverse (I cant remember which) which cuts out the rheostatic brake. Had no idea they could do that! bearing in mind that the principles of the stock are essentually the same I'd imagine they can in that case. I was under the impression that when the rheo brake isn't working on a unit, the train just gives EP when the TBC is in rheo/EP positions. 5701 has been donated to a technology college in Greenwich, no idea about 6701 though. Yes turns out you can do that on C stock!
|
|
|
Post by tel on Aug 28, 2013 10:33:13 GMT
The two-car set in Acton was 5595-6595. It left Acton for scrap in July. Many, many thanks - very much appreciated
|
|
paulsw2
My Train Runs For Those Who Wait Not Wait For Those That Run
Posts: 303
|
Post by paulsw2 on Aug 28, 2013 13:19:14 GMT
Just had a great journey on 5545 about half an hour ago from Kings Cross - Baker Street, driver got to line speed, used full service braking and threw it off at the last second for a smooth stop. It couldn't have been rheo brake because the traction motors were silent during braking and was not westinghouse because there was no air noises, so was just EP. Can the driver isolate the rheo these days? or could it have been a non working rheo brake with EP compensating? either way its impressive how smooth and quickly the C stock can stop with a good driver and brakes. Wonder if C stock can do what 72ts do where you can throw the reverser to neutral or reverse (I cant remember which) which cuts out the rheostatic brake. I'm gonna try that next time I have C stock
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Aug 30, 2013 11:17:28 GMT
Had no idea they could do that! bearing in mind that the principles of the stock are essentually the same I'd imagine they can in that case. I was under the impression that when the rheo brake isn't working on a unit, the train just gives EP when the TBC is in rheo/EP positions. 5701 has been donated to a technology college in Greenwich, no idea about 6701 though. Yes turns out you can do that on C stock! Hmm! The rheostatic brake reduces brake dust and wheel wear. It is not environmentally aware or sensible to encourage this type of unauthorised misuse of the controls, whatever you might think about the quality of the control provided in the design around 40 years ago.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2013 14:33:40 GMT
Yes turns out you can do that on C stock! Hmm! The rheostatic brake reduces brake dust and wheel wear. It is not environmentally aware or sensible to encourage this type of unauthorised misuse of the controls, whatever you might think about the quality of the control provided in the design around 40 years ago. Oh no!
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Aug 30, 2013 14:44:36 GMT
Hmm! The rheostatic brake reduces brake dust and wheel wear. It is not environmentally aware or sensible to encourage this type of unauthorised misuse of the controls, whatever you might think about the quality of the control provided in the design around 40 years ago. By that same logic, drivers who do entire rounds on the Westinghouse should be told off. Personally, I quite admire those drivers, as I'd imagine that the older Westinghouse system is a bit more variable, and considerably harder to master. I also find it smoother, if they do it correctly!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2013 16:33:45 GMT
According to the Eastleigh Works blog, more C stock are due next week. Any ideas which?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Aug 31, 2013 16:53:46 GMT
According to the Eastleigh Works blog, more C stock are due next week. Any ideas which? No units have yet been selected for the 2 disposals next week.
|
|