|
Post by vic09 on Apr 9, 2012 10:22:13 GMT
I have just been watching a video, what tube lines published 3 years ago, and it states that TBTC has the ability to open the doors at stations, close them when it wants to and start the train of at stations by itself . This clearly is not true and TBTC cant do this. Were they lying or was a different system planned for the TBTC lines. ??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 10:40:39 GMT
Apparently there are two types of ATO which are very different. One requires a driver in the cab. The other does not - think DLR. it is this version that I believe could more easily be made to automatically open and close the doors
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Apr 9, 2012 15:07:17 GMT
I don't think tube lines were telling porkies this video is just a promotional video from Seltrack probably. I don't think drivers on the ATO lines will be very happy if the doors go automatic too! I am sure trains are capable for auto close for ATO, Just going to cost allot to install!
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 10, 2012 7:46:02 GMT
Generally, modern ATC control software has the ability to open and close doors automatically. You just have to ask for it to be available or not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2012 2:18:34 GMT
The trains on Line 14 of the Paris Metro manage to stop at the right place on the platforms, open doors on both train and platform, pause, then close the doors. All without any human intervention.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2012 23:09:15 GMT
I believe auto open is easy to switch on for the Jub & Northern versions of TBTC, as both the system and the trains can do it, its just it was not enabled from the outset. It may still come into play. I don't think auto closing doors is an option though without some significant work on the trains. I am sure the rest of the TBTC systems would require only software changes though, so even that could be made to happen if someone wanted it. DLR still doesn't have auto closing doors with TBTC - the trains are still wired up to have the on-board member of staff to close the doors via the door panel or emergency driving position. The S stock doors individually self-close though don't they for the air-con I believe?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2012 1:00:11 GMT
I have just been watching a video, what tube lines published 3 years ago, and it states that TBTC has the ability to open the doors at stations, close them when it wants to and start the train of at stations by itself . This clearly is not true and TBTC cant do this. Were they lying or was a different system planned for the TBTC lines. ?? As mentioned before in thread. TBTC / CBTC can automatically open doors, close doors, and start trains by themselves. There are now many very successful driverless metro lines in the world, using many different signalling technologies (track circuits, inductive loop, radio based transmission). The degree of what is automated is dependant on the customer and their requirements - this in itself can be dependant on policies and politics. On the technical side of things, some of these features can be changed by little more than a software modification. Again, these ATO/TBTC/CBTC bashing threads are getting tiresome.
|
|
|
Post by 1018509 on Apr 18, 2012 20:50:48 GMT
Even the original ATO on the 1967 stock on the Victoria Line could have been easily modified to open and close the doors at station stops. After all, all the driver is doing is closing or opening switches on a relay manually. The safety aspect however is quite a different thing. I don't think I would be too keen on travelling on a deep level, un-staffed, tube train
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2012 23:16:43 GMT
HMRI - Her Majestys Railway Inspectorate, would never (for the forceable) allow automatic closing doors on deep level tube without a member of staff somewhere on the train (or control room via CCTV??) operating a safety switch to do so. The software and system is probably more than capable of it tomorrow but is something that won't happen on LU for a very long time.
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Jun 20, 2012 19:41:52 GMT
JLESCS - the Alcatel signals control system for the JLE - that was replaced by TBTC - also had a door open/close feature, also disabled, along with a lot of other disabled features.
These JLESCS disabled features were sometimes still there but greyed out so could not mouse click them, or not displayed at all but present in disabled code. One of the greyed out features was DC traction switching from the signallers workstations.
That Alcatel control system would have been implemented line wide had the 1990s Westinghouse ATO been made to work; in the ATC hierarchy it would have been Westinghouse ATP and ATO but Alcatel ATS, unlike the Central where Westinghouse supplied all ATO ATP and ATS.
-- Nick
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Jun 20, 2012 19:52:51 GMT
HMRI - Her Majestys Railway Inspectorate, would never (for the forceable) allow automatic closing doors on deep level tube without a member of staff somewhere on the train (or control room via CCTV??) operating a safety switch to do so. The software and system is probably more than capable of it tomorrow but is something that won't happen on LU for a very long time. Ummm not sure you are right there. Isn't the Heathrow Terminal 5 shuttle transit system entirely underground and unattended ? And it uses Bombardier Cityflo 650 control system which is what LU SSL is getting (or another version of it). HMRI would not distinguish between an LU tube line and an airport shuttle by function of passenger type - for them they are then same: underground railways, thats all, automatic, unattended, underground, railways. Even if some prefer to call it a people mover - and even Bombardier themselves call it an APM - automatic people mover - in some places, it is still a train. The very fact that LHR T5 transit exists in UK operation does a lot of proof of concept. -- Nick
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2012 10:02:15 GMT
I know the 1995 stock when first on the Northern Line doors were opened by pax but this was withdrawn as being driver operated was seen to be more efficient. And they are not ALL the same. Deep level tube trains and SSL trains are as different as chalk and cheese, one being large and the other being smaller. SSL do not go down deep level tubes.
I saw that there are electric pods twixt car parks and the terminal so I suppose it could be this you mean. :-)
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Jun 22, 2012 3:46:07 GMT
I know the 1995 stock when first on the Northern Line doors were opened by pax but this was withdrawn as being driver operated was seen to be more efficient. And they are not ALL the same. Deep level tube trains and SSL trains are as different as chalk and cheese, one being large and the other being smaller. SSL do not go down deep level tubes. I saw that there are electric pods twixt car parks and the terminal so I suppose it could be this you mean. :-) The trains may be different, but the environment is the same for this purpoise - HMRI would apply the same "underground" rules to somewhere "main line" like City Thameslink that is not LU. And no, the T5 transit is a railway, nothing whatsover to do with those pod things. -- Nick
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2012 11:37:14 GMT
Could you describe this T5 Transit as I don't see it anywhere apart from those pods which Google throws up. It would be very interesting as I was the Lead Instructor when T5 opened and apart from Heathrow Express and the underground (and those damn pods, lol) I'm puzzled.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jun 22, 2012 13:27:49 GMT
Could you describe this T5 Transit as I don't see it anywhere apart from those pods which Google throws up. It would be very interesting as I was the Lead Instructor when T5 opened and apart from Heathrow Express and the underground (and those damn pods, lol) I'm puzzled. I assume he is referring to the "track transit" system connecting Termianls 5A, 5B and 5C, which look to be similar to the system connecting Gatwick's terminals - except at Gatwick they are on a viaduct. These are quite different from the "pods" connecting T5 to the business car park. As they are airside, they would not be seen by people not actually flying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2012 14:13:12 GMT
Right. Thanks for that info. I'll have a look next time I fly. :-)
|
|