Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2012 14:45:15 GMT
Well, it had to happen some time. Yesterday I encountered the first window scratching on a new S stock car, (number not noted). The etching was deep and extensive.
I thought that technology was now available to prevent or reduce this damage. Haven't the fast disappearing A stock cars have a belatedly fitted film on the glass? Is there something about S stock glass that enables the etching to be removed? Or will this damage travel around for the next many years as an encouragement to others?
My concern is that within 5 years unless some more radical action for cleaning, refurbishing and repairing is undertaken the s stock will look as tatty as the A stock has progressively become since the 90s refurb.
|
|
|
Post by trt on Feb 3, 2012 15:15:13 GMT
What they need is some sort of nano-bot which lives just under the surface of the glass, so that when the glass is scratched, the nano-bot becomes activated in order to march up the handle of whatever it is the scrotes use and pigment the skin on their forehead with a fluorescent pink comic knob. Or something.
|
|
|
Post by retep on Feb 3, 2012 15:54:01 GMT
My concern is that within 5 years unless some more radical action for cleaning, refurbishing and repairing is undertaken the s stock will look as tatty as the A stock has progressively become since the 90s refurb. A stock doesn't look tatty and looks clean to me. S stock will probably still look good if they are well maintained.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Feb 3, 2012 16:19:09 GMT
I bet in a few years time say 2 or 3 years they will look tacky i hope nobody will graffiti on them or damage them. I hope they maintain the S stock well because other trains don't seem to be.
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Feb 3, 2012 23:04:52 GMT
What are we defining as poor maintenance here, which other stocks?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2012 20:31:36 GMT
Just in 25022 where some moron probably called Jake has decided that the windowsill would look much better with 'JAKE' carved in down to the metal.
No doubt done with his moronic feet on the seats.
Both of these activities really P me off - thought these trains were supposed to be crawling with CCTV cameras, really is time a few of these scum were made an example of.
Grrrrrr:(
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2012 16:07:34 GMT
It annoys me to. I've seen a few S Stocks with scratched windows now. m dont forget its not the windows. its the film over the windows. it can be removed, and replaced at any time.
|
|
kabsonline
Best SSL Train: S Stock Best Tube Train: 92 Stock
Posts: 686
|
Post by kabsonline on Feb 9, 2012 16:22:47 GMT
It annoys me to. I've seen a few S Stocks with scratched windows now. m dont forget its not the windows. its the film over the windows. it can be removed, and replaced at any time. I didn't know this. So basically is it a quick two minute task of peeling the film of and putting a new one on? Also is the film always replaced or is it removed and somtimes just left without a replacement?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2012 17:41:45 GMT
m dont forget its not the windows. its the film over the windows. it can be removed, and replaced at any time. I didn't know this. So basically is it a quick two minute task of peeling the film of and putting a new one on? Also is the film always replaced or is it removed and somtimes just left without a replacement? normally it is just removed after the attack, and a fresh new one applied. 20 mins tops. ;D
|
|
kabsonline
Best SSL Train: S Stock Best Tube Train: 92 Stock
Posts: 686
|
Post by kabsonline on Feb 9, 2012 18:30:18 GMT
Quite handy really
|
|
|
Post by trt on Mar 12, 2012 10:52:06 GMT
I'm sorry to report that when we turned up at Watford on Sunday morning in order to zig-zag our way down to Acton, an S stock which had been stabled there overnight had been vandalised all down one side. It was so far down the line from the platform that we couldn't see properly if there was other damage, but when we went past it one could see that the spray painting extended up onto the windows and was like that on every car. It really makes my blood boil that these little sh**s seem to get away with such wanton and mindless acts. It must have cost them the best part of £50 for that much spray paint if they hadn't robbed it from somewhere. All through the journey I was making up ways of sorting the scum out - introducing a shoot-to-kill policy and night guards, equipping the trains with some form of on-board CCTV recording triggered by an infra-red curtain which could double as a detector for people falling between the platform and the car, to making them culpable for the repayment of damages by a lifelong adjustment of their tax code and/or benefits payments.
Maybe this should be in rants, but it's hard enough investing in new stock and other assets without having to factor in the acts of these scum-sucking bottom-feeders.
Any other ideas as to how to tackle vandalism, trespass etc. ?
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Mar 12, 2012 11:59:04 GMT
There is an assumption that those responsible are young kids...perhaps they are in this instance.....but one day,quite a few years ago,I was cycling the Parkland Walk near Crouch End Station quite early one morning. There were two guys with a milk-crate full of spray cans busy decorating one of the overbridges. They were both white,male and well into their thirties,and certainly didn't LOOK poor or ill-educated. I nearly shouted out "Bit old for that kind of lark,aren't you?" but something about their demeanour told me that if I did,I would rapidly lose control of events. I didn't call the Police...perhaps I should have...
|
|
|
Post by trt on Mar 12, 2012 12:17:09 GMT
I know. One cannot make the assumption that this is a youth phenomenon. I know a 30-odd year old 'street artist', though like many others he restricts his canvases to invitation only; there is quite a community for this activity.
The BTP should always be contacted if you see something like this happening on the rail network. 0800 40 50 40 Put it in your phone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2012 12:33:25 GMT
How come the vandals can get access to stabled trains? My nearest sidings at Uxbridge are totally secure as they are surrounded by eight foot fencing topped with razor wire; surely the same applies to all depots? In addition the proximity of 630V DC should be a pretty effective deterrent.
|
|
|
Post by trt on Mar 12, 2012 12:39:34 GMT
Following a complaint/report, the text in this post has been removed.
All Members Please consider whether the information you post might be of use of those who graffiti Undergound rolling stock/intrastructure.
Many thanks
ChrisW
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2012 14:11:06 GMT
There is something crazy about this. The cost of repairing vandal damage must be so great as to justify the expense of adequate fencing, at least along track within walking distance of sidings. But this does not consider the H&S legislation which dictates that you must protect people from themselves. If someone accesses the track through this gap when the power is on and electrocutes themselves LU would be held liable. As an example, there is a bridge near Uxbridge station where LU spent a fortune strengthening a short wall simply to stop (the unlikely chance of) runaway vehicles smashing through onto the track below. LU is clearly aware of their responsibilities, why do they not take the same precautions in securing their sidings?
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Mar 12, 2012 15:16:58 GMT
But this does not consider the H&S legislation which dictates that you must protect people from themselves. If someone accesses the track through this gap when the power is on and electrocutes themselves LU would be held liable. At the risk of straying into Rant territory,I must say I think this is where this country has totally lost the plot in the last few decades. It seems self-evident to me that someone clearly trespassing (by having crossed a fenced boundary) with (or even without) criminal intent should forfeit any claim for injury or loss from the owner of the land. The obligation should be upon the claimant to prove that the boundary was unclear,and that the risk was thus "public" rather than upon the defendant to prove that they had taken all possible steps to exclude trespassers. This was the case when (groan) I was a boy not so very long ago. Railways were fenced with an open wooden palisade or perhaps iron spikes or a few strands of barbed wire.Access was easy.I speak from experience. Anyone not on the railway with good cause was there entirely at their own risk...and knew it So what has changed since then to justify putting the onus upon the railway?. It would be interesting to see how many trespassers were killed on today's (extraordinarily expensively) fortified railways compared with (say) 1972...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2012 8:46:26 GMT
It still doesn't hide the essential point about LU security. Can you imagine the reaction from the public (and Boris!) if London buses were running around covered in unsightly graffiti? And if stabled trains can be accessed for vandalism, they can be planted with bombs. I repeat my earlier question, why don't LU secure their sidings?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 13, 2012 23:18:25 GMT
True, but the effects is there to be seen. No line is safe. Going to Acton last week proved that 73 and D stock are looking shabby in places!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2012 0:15:57 GMT
Let me use the 95 stock as an example here, they aren't looking too bad in comparison with other stocks, but I have seen etching on quite a few windows and interior panelling that is dated 2001/2002!! (like any fine artiste {extreme sarcasm} they date their handy work) Also there are loads of doors that have had graffiti cleaned off and the paintwork has been really badly damaged, but no effort seems to be taken to rectify that.
I use the 1995 stock as an example here because they are still relatively new and my point is that the S stock will start looking like this very soon if something isn't done about it. Having said that its unfortunate that no matter how much prevention you take in securing a depot, they are always going to find a window of opportunity to find a "canvas" when it's in regular service so to speak. I hope that as well as cleaning, the paintwork is repaired afterwards to keep them looking smart (for a good example of what happens if this is not done, take a look on the outside of pretty much any C stock!)
|
|
|
Post by trt on Mar 14, 2012 10:12:39 GMT
Am I wrong in thinking that the newer rolling stock is bristling with CCTV? Surely footage of these a-holes at work could be used to identify persistent offenders and remove them from the system, even be used to recover the cost of repair? How much does it cost to de-grafitti an entire train anyway?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2012 17:08:40 GMT
I know. One cannot make the assumption that this is a youth phenomenon. I know a 30-odd year old 'street artist', though like many others he restricts his canvases to invitation only; there is quite a community for this activity. The BTP should always be contacted if you see something like this happening on the rail network. 0800 40 50 40 Put it in your phone. Quite agree with the clear generalisation and assumption. The poster I saw at Chalfont yesterday said how 'Youth are vandalising our trains', not quite sure how its just youth, especially as there are no CCTV cameras on A stock.
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Apr 13, 2012 7:19:51 GMT
21043 was the set involved if I remember correctly. I guess there really isn't many things that you can do which will stop this sort of thing happening; you can put up as much razor wire and put up as much 20ft high fencing as you want but this will only really have a dampening effect as you'll see that this was done in service on a crew change. As much as it does annoy me to even see my own stock get attacked by these scumbags but there is little that can be done! Don't even get me started on acid etching IMAGES HAVE BEEN DELETED BY CHRISW The images had not been resized... however that's irrelevant.
Can members please be reminded that the forum guidelines state: (6h) It is unacceptable to post in a manner that celebrates any illegal activity (e.g. graffiti, violence, trespass etc).
I'm aware of the hostility with regard to damage to trains that all members are posting in this thread, however regardless, this forum is not the place to post images of tags (even to prove that vandalism has occurred to S stock). So called 'taggers' get their rocks off seeing their work being posted publicly. Lets not oblige them !
|
|
|
Post by vic09 on Apr 13, 2012 7:50:04 GMT
if I told you what I thought of this I would be banned from this forum, Allready!!! No!!!!!!!! Poor S Stock, what do they get out of this, makes me so mad, I knew it, Just wait until these get on the eastern end of the distict line, TFL need to take away the luxereys of a train like this, if the little scums cant look after them
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Apr 13, 2012 10:36:23 GMT
what do they get out of this, Publicity. That's why we (and all responsible press) don't allow any pics of their efforts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 15:42:48 GMT
Will the S7's have bullet proof windows cab windows (or whatever they have), like the D stock's currently do, due to the throwing of objects on the eastern end of the line?
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Apr 13, 2012 15:56:45 GMT
I've heard they are impact resistant.. the bomb run on the east district does sound all too familiar!
If we look at Eurostar, trains are stabled overnight berthed at SPI and the depot Temple Mills. Both places including HS1 are protected by the Channel Tunnel Security Order 1994; In other words, money has been spent in making sure people who shouldn't be getting in, simply don't get in. I think this is going to pretty much be a life long problem with LUL due to the fact that the track isnt exactly protected in remote areas and most stations out in the sticks are pretty easy to get access track side out of hours. So if they cant/wont fight it by securing their railway, carry the protection on the stock by means of having the exterior covered in a anti graffiti laminate.
At least it will make it easier when cleaning it off!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 16:36:49 GMT
At least it will make it easier when cleaning it off! Gives someone a job to do! I don't think you can stop graffiti attacks really, unless Eurostar style security is deployed everywhere, which costs an arm and a leg!
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Apr 13, 2012 20:09:25 GMT
My point exactly mappman. It's just something that we're all going to have to learn to live with.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2012 13:57:45 GMT
Just goes to show that some people, usually the ones in the top office, have this idealised view of London and how it should be. They need to take a step in to the real world!
|
|