castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Nov 26, 2011 11:37:45 GMT
............and l've just learned from the website that gantshill has referred us to , that until 1994, not all of Heathrow airport was initially within the Greater London boundary.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Nov 26, 2011 12:17:31 GMT
There is a lot of thread drift, but as it's still relevant to the OP in a roundabout sort of way, there's no reason why it needs splitting, or any other action taking.
|
|
pitdiver
No longer gainfully employed
Posts: 439
|
Post by pitdiver on Nov 26, 2011 12:27:23 GMT
Mention of the 84 bus to St Albans brings back many memories. As a child my treat was going on that particular service all the way from Arnos Grove to St Albans and back. I believe the 84 ran out of Palmers Green (AD) garage. Another treat was to travel on the 29 route to Victoria. A totally different experience but none the less exciting. When I got a bit older my plan was to try and circumnavigate by bus but I ever got as far as Kingston. Does anybody know whether it is possible now to do this without going through central London.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2011 12:59:41 GMT
When I got a bit older my plan was to try and circumnavigate by bus but I ever got as far as Kingston. Does anybody know whether it is possible now to do this without going through central London. Given enough changes, certainly, but it rather depends what you mean by 'Central London' - the issue is getting across the Thames to the east, which necessitates use of the Blackwall Tunnel/108. Circumnavigation of (and outside) Zone 1 by 'London Rail' is possible
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 26, 2011 14:28:33 GMT
When I got a bit older my plan was to try and circumnavigate by bus but I ever got as far as Kingston. Does anybody know whether it is possible now to do this without going through central London. Given enough changes, certainly, but it rather depends what you mean by 'Central London' - the issue is getting across the Thames to the east, which necessitates use of the Blackwall Tunnel/108. Circumnavigation of (and outside) Zone 1 by 'London Rail' is possible If you're prepared to accept the Woolwich foot tunnel (when it reopens, allegedly early in the new year) as a walk between adjacent stops, or classify the Woolwich Ferry as a bus (it does carry them, just not in service) then you can get further out than the Blackwall Tunnel. There is at least one non-London service via the Dartford Crossings (Bluewater-Lakeside) I believe. If the Thames Gateway Bridge is ever built, I think the plan is to run bus services over it, so it may in future be possible entirely by London bus.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 26, 2011 16:21:38 GMT
railtechnician I was in Brockley at the time, my Nan was a supervisor at New Cross exchange - Whether it was just her story or not I don't know, but she always said our line was special because she made it and she routed all calls to and from it. I spend many a happy day sat in the exchange with headphones on listening to and watching all the girls working. Anyhow, I digress... Brockley was in the BERmondsey exchange area and that was 01-237. NEW Cross, 01-639, exchange area was just outside Brockley and these days is wholly within the Bermondsey exchange area which is a much larger area now than it once would've been, it even covers about half of the Deptford exchange area nowadays as it now has at least three 10000 line units, 8231, 8232 & 8237 which have all existed since at least 1986. Deptford of course is relatively new having not existed at all 40 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Nov 26, 2011 17:25:42 GMT
The annoying thing is that there are very few if any bus services that cross the M25. If I wanted to travel into London by bus I would have to go via Grays and catch the 370 to Upminster, a rather long and tedious journey. Before anyone points out that there are plenty of rail services they do not accept my senior citizens bus pass.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 26, 2011 17:51:55 GMT
present 0708 number for Romford. 01708 since phONEday in 1995 when I first worked for Picc Line Engineering in 1996 we had Mobile phones which were all on 01895 84XXXX numbers as I recall. I don't think so - after phONEday in 1995 all mobile phones had 07xxx codes. Any mobile phone codes in the 08xx series became 078xx. 01895 was Uxbridge The 020 telephone numbers and the London postal districts follow roughly the old LCC area). Closer to the GLC area, certainly in the south and west
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 26, 2011 17:57:52 GMT
............and l've just learned from the website that gantshill has referred us to , that until 1994, not all of Heathrow airport was initially within the Greater London boundary. Indeed: a former colleague of mine was a Staines magistrate - he got a lot of the cases involving crimes at the cargo terminal (smuggling, theft) Later, Terminal 4 was built straddling the boundary between Spelthorne District (part of Surrey) and the London Borough of Hillingdon. Of course, until 1965 Heathrow was entirely within Middlesex!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 26, 2011 18:13:26 GMT
Another treat was to travel on the 29 route to Victoria. . As an aside, the last bendy in central London ran last night on the 29 - only one route, way out west, still to go (and that is likely to be overshadowed by the Olympia shuttle's last weekday service)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2011 18:36:14 GMT
I've enjoyed this thread a lot; it's a shame there's no history of telephony available that doesn't go really deeply into the technical details! As a resident of Ruislip, I'm curious to know where the boundary is for 0208 numbers, as some businesses have them in South Ruislip, I think, but up here it's all 01895. My ex-employer has every office of theirs in England on 0207 numbers, which includes Exeter and Nottingham! The offices in Scotland are on local codes.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Nov 26, 2011 18:50:20 GMT
RT: That was extremely infomative and fascinating, thank you very much for it all. I can't claim to know much about dialing codes, but certainly one notices changes and references to obsolete ones. Its always interesting to know why the changes and developments happen.
My nans old rotary phone included the 71- number on it. I could never work out the logic of that somehow evolving into 01895-6-
In addition nowadays theres an 01895-5- code, which seems to stick out as an odd number, and I almost certain no one has a 5 digit number in the area anymore, and hasn't done since well before the millenium.
Norb, are you sure about the date with mobile numbers? When I started school glancing at the register once I noticed someones home contact number started with an 04xx code, and our year started in 1999. Further, I remember reading an artical in the Metro possibly a couple of years later about the remaining mobile numbers that didnt begin 07xxx being changed to comply. It stuck in my mind at the time as I had always wondered what kind of number would begin with an 04xx code, and this explained.
|
|
|
Post by charleyfarley on Nov 26, 2011 20:28:13 GMT
Sorry SE15, I guess the thread drift is down to me for asking two separate questions in the original post. Some very interesting responses.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Nov 26, 2011 21:38:07 GMT
railtechnician I was in Brockley at the time, my Nan was a supervisor at New Cross exchange - Whether it was just her story or not I don't know, but she always said our line was special because she made it and she routed all calls to and from it. I spend many a happy day sat in the exchange with headphones on listening to and watching all the girls working. Anyhow, I digress... Brockley was in the BERmondsey exchange area and that was 01-237. NEW Cross, 01-639, exchange area was just outside Brockley and these days is wholly within the Bermondsey exchange area which is a much larger area now than it once would've been, it even covers about half of the Deptford exchange area nowadays as it now has at least three 10000 line units, 8231, 8232 & 8237 which have all existed since at least 1986. Deptford of course is relatively new having not existed at all 40 years ago. Could be, I thought the number was (01) 557 0194, but on thinking about it, could that have been Capital Radio as was? There's a confusion because it's a number I remember, Capital wasn't launched until 1973, and it was 194 on the dial, and I would have been 5 at the time. That said, all the frequencies changed in 78 or so, and I moved here in 83.... With the mod hat on, we'll keep this thread as it's running right now, and as it slips down the list, switch the threads and move accordingly.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 26, 2011 21:50:36 GMT
Brockley was in the BERmondsey exchange area and that was 01-237. NEW Cross, 01-639, exchange area was just outside Brockley and these days is wholly within the Bermondsey exchange area which is a much larger area now than it once would've been, it even covers about half of the Deptford exchange area nowadays as it now has at least three 10000 line units, 8231, 8232 & 8237 which have all existed since at least 1986. Deptford of course is relatively new having not existed at all 40 years ago. Could be, I thought the number was (01) 557 0194, but on thinking about it, could that have been Capital Radio as was? There's a confusion because it's a number I remember, Capital wasn't launched until 1973, and it was 194 on the dial, and I would have been 5 at the time. That said, all the frequencies changed in 78 or so, and I moved here in 83.... With the mod hat on, we'll keep this thread as it's running right now, and as it slips down the list, switch the threads and move accordingly.As I said there never was an 01-557 exchange, 557 was what one dialled in London to reach the Overseas Telegram Operator. Although that code changed in later years and would've been available there was no 01-557 exchange as late as 1986
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 26, 2011 23:43:56 GMT
Norb, are you sure about the date with mobile numbers? When I started school glancing at the register once I noticed someones home contact number started with an 04xx code, and our year started in 1999. Further, I remember reading an artical in the Metro possibly a couple of years later about the remaining mobile numbers that didnt begin 07xxx being changed to comply. It stuck in my mind at the time as I had always wondered what kind of number would begin with an 04xx code, and this explained. Mea culpa! They changed in 2000 The changes were as follows May 1990: 071/081 split, freeeing up the 01x codes for the next phase 16 April 1995: phONEday - all geographic codes had a "1" inserted, except for a few which got new 011x codes to allow seven-digit numbers. The International access code was changed from 010 to 00 22 April 2000: the Big Number - introduction of 02x codes for Northern Ireland, re-unification of London, and some other areas. Special tariff numbers renumbered in the 08xx and 09xx series (plus 0500 for historical reasons). Mobiles renumbered in 07xxx series. However, according to the wikipedia article on the subject, the only 08xx codes in use for mobiles prior to the Big Number change were 0802, 0831, 0836, 0839, 0850 and 0860, all became 078xx.Tthere were also two pager code and nine premium rate codes in the 08xx series. Mobile codes in the 03x, and 04x series generally had the digit after the zero replaced with a 77 (so 0402 became 07702), whilst those in the 08x and 09x series simply had a 7 inserted (so 0850 became 07850). (Those in the 07xx series became 077xx, thereby complying with both substitution rules!) In passing, it is remarkable how persistent the idea of inner and outer London codes has been - the distinction ceased to exist over eleven years ago (longer than it actually existed) and yet the majority of Londoners, including in the telecoms industry itself, persist in presenting their phone numbers as 0208 xxx xxxx - even when that produces bizarre looking numbers like 0207 035 xxxx. And when eight digit numbers started to be introduced in London staritng witha digit other than 7 or 8, everyone started shouting about a third code for London, missing the point of all the previous changes entirely! It's not just London: most Cardiff taxis advetrise their numbers as 02920 xxxxxx, despite the fact that dialling those last six digits alone has no effect whatsover except to get the "unobtainable" tone. When Reading switched from 01734 to 0118, and from six to seven digit numbers, the extra digit added was a 9, prefixed to the old number. Inevitably some people misunderstood and thought Reading's code was now 01189. Not a huge problem, until seven-digit numbers starting with a 3 were introduced, and people either assumed the "3" was a mistake and dialled 01189 anyway, or started dialling 01189 3zyxwvu. I say "started" because they would get through to 0118 93z yxwv. At one time, the Berkshire Fire Brigade (0118 932 2zyx) was getting phone calls intended for Newbury General Hospital (0118 322 zyxw) (01) 557 0194, but on thinking about it, could that have been Capital Radio as was? I haven't listened to Capital for years, but had it on most of the time when I was a student. I'm pretty sure it was firstly 388 1255, (a Euston number) and then became 484 5255.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 27, 2011 9:00:19 GMT
Don't trust Wikipedia without corroboration from other sources! Those of us who are passionate about preservation of telephone history have seen it rewritten in wikipedia pages in recent years. It is good but it is not perfect, remember that anyone can edit such pages. Believe it or not when it comes to telephone number allocations even Ofcom has longstanding discrepancies in its published list. When all the number changes were being undertaken by Oftel they were all aimed at creating a coherent and manageable national numbering scheme that would last for decades without exhaustion of dialling codes, however, when Oftel was replaced by Ofcom it disregarded Oftel's work and as a result there is a shortage of available dialling codes and numbers in some areas so in the not too distant future there will probably be more number changes to come up and down the country. Of course numbers are pretty meaningless nowadays as unless one knows the history of the changes it can be difficult to determine the geographical location of many numbers, the influx of mobile phones since the 1970s has also had a pronounced effect as more and more number blocks have been gobbled up by the thousand as has the allocation of 10000 number blocks to the many competing telcos.
As for the inner/outer London debacle a big deal was made when 01 gave way to the 071/081 split, reinforced by the insertion of the 'S' digit to create 0171/0181 which both cost London businesses a fortune in office stationary, vehicle and shop front signwriting etc. When 0171/0181 was replaced by 0207/0208 it was advertised in that way for a long time before the point was made that the new code for London was 020, the point was never made crystal clear at the time and the trend for memorable numbers allowed BT to get into the habit of misquoting its numbers just as many other businesses deliberately do in an attempt to draw greater patronage. It was thus not unexpected when 020 3XXX XXXX numbers were introduced that most intelligent people saw it as a new 0203 code for London. One could drive along Green Lanes in Haringey six years ago and still see old telephone numbers such as MOU XXXX signwritten on the fascia boards above shop fronts and there were still vehicles carrying 01-NXX XXXX numbers plying the streets of the capital!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 27, 2011 11:18:30 GMT
On my trips round the Underground I've seen more than a few 071/081 signs and even the odd 01. The example below is D7080's photo of a sign at Whitechapel that was still there at least as recently as September 2010 It's not just London either, there is still a sign in Cheddar displaying the pre-1995 0934 code (934 being Weston-super-Mare, 93 would also fit Wells (closer to Cheddar than Weston is) but that uses the 749 code that I've always presumed to be Shepton Mallet). Probably in about 1997 I remember seeing a lorry advertising a Bristol company with an 01272 phone number - Bristol changed from 0272 to 0117 on phONE day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2011 14:13:11 GMT
On my trips round the Underground I've seen more than a few 071/081 signs and even the odd 01. There was a sign at South Croydon until comparatively recently - perhaps twenty years ago now - which quoted the establishment's phone number as 18 ! (so was 50+ years out of date? - when did such numbers go out?)
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 27, 2011 15:35:19 GMT
On my trips round the Underground I've seen more than a few 071/081 signs and even the odd 01. There was a sign at South Croydon until comparatively recently - perhaps twenty years ago now - which quoted the establishment's phone number as 18 ! (so was 50+ years out of date? - when did such numbers go out?) Tell me the name and address details and I'll look it up ! In manual exchange days the numbering was not always standardised to say 3, 4 or 5 digits so 2, 3 and 4 digit numbers might all appear on the same exchange as generally numbers ran from say 1-2000 rather than 0001-2000.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2011 16:27:56 GMT
There was a sign at South Croydon until comparatively recently - perhaps twenty years ago now - which quoted the establishment's phone number as 18 ! (so was 50+ years out of date? - when did such numbers go out?) Tell me the name and address details and I'll look it up ! In manual exchange days the numbering was not always standardised to say 3, 4 or 5 digits so 2, 3 and 4 digit numbers might all appear on the same exchange as generally numbers ran from say 1-2000 rather than 0001-2000. It was hard by South Croydon Station (forget any more details). Obviously a relic of manual exchange days!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Nov 27, 2011 22:07:28 GMT
I wonder what the shortest existing number would be now, excluding area code. Sure that not too long back I saw a six digit area code for somewhere up north, wonder if theres a seven digit one anywhere...
EDIT: Brampton, Cumbria, last place to have 4 digit (though it has 5 digit aswell) local numbers; Area code 016977, subscriber numbers 2xxx and 3xxx. And a few other places across the country have 6 digit area codes aswell, though not many.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 27, 2011 22:18:36 GMT
When I got a bit older my plan was to try and circumnavigate by bus but I ever got as far as Kingston. Does anybody know whether it is possible now to do this without going through central London. Obvioously possible from the bus map, but the trick is to do it with as few buses as possible For example: starting at Bow 108 to North Greenwich 177 to Peckham, 37 Putney, 220 to Willesden, 260 to Golders Green, 210 to Finsbury Park, 106 to Clapton, 425 to Bow somewhat longer, again starting at Bow: 108 Lewisham 75 Croydon X26 Heathrow 140 Harrow 186 Brent Cross 210 Finsbury Park 106 Clapton 425 Bow can it be done in less than eight buses? Circumnavigation of (and outside) Zone 1 by 'London Rail' is possible For example, starting at Clapham Junction: Overground to Stratford, Jubilee Line to Canada Water Overground to Crystal palace Southern to Clapham Junction. (once the SLL extension is open, only Shoreditch HS will prevent you doing it entirely by Overground)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2011 23:16:34 GMT
Circumnavigation of (and outside) Zone 1 by 'London Rail' is possible For example, starting at Clapham Junction: Overground to Stratford, Jubilee Line to Canada Water Overground to Crystal palace Southern to Clapham Junction. (once the SLL extension is open, only Shoreditch HS will prevent you doing it entirely by Overground) But that is not London Rail all the way: a correct version is Stratford > Overground > West Brompton > District > Wimbledon > Tramlink > West Croydon > Overground > Canada Water > Jubilee > Stratford
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 27, 2011 23:50:59 GMT
I don't know about Bow to Bow, but via the Woolwich Ferry can be done in 9 buses. If the X26 and 122 interchanged then it would be 8 buses. I have a feeling that there ought to be a way to eliminate 1 bus in North East London too, but I can't work out what it is.
473 North Woolwich Ferry to Newham University Hospital 276 Newham Univiersity Hospital to Stoke Newington 106 Stoke Newington to Finsbury Park 210 Finsbury Park to Brent Cross 122 Brent Cross to Ealing Broadway 65 Ealing Broadway to Kingston X26 Kingston to West Croydon 75 West Croydon to Lewisham 180 Lewisham to Woolwich Ferry
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 27, 2011 23:54:05 GMT
In manual exchange days the numbering was not always standardised to say 3, 4 or 5 digits so 2, 3 and 4 digit numbers might all appear on the same exchange as generally numbers ran from say 1-2000 rather than 0001-2000. The house we lived in in North Yorkshire between 1986 and 1991 was North Cowton 408 for most of the time we were there (it was six figures by the time we left), but I don't think it was long before 1986 that it changed from simply North Cowton 8.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 28, 2011 5:38:10 GMT
In manual exchange days the numbering was not always standardised to say 3, 4 or 5 digits so 2, 3 and 4 digit numbers might all appear on the same exchange as generally numbers ran from say 1-2000 rather than 0001-2000. The house we lived in in North Yorkshire between 1986 and 1991 was North Cowton 408 for most of the time we were there (it was six figures by the time we left), but I don't think it was long before 1986 that it changed from simply North Cowton 8. North Cowton rings no bells with me but having looked up my 1968 list of UK exchanges I see that it was in the DArlington (DA5=325) group and listed at that time with an STD Code of 0325 78. The list gives current and planned STD Codes some of which were never used, however, cross checking I have North Cowton listed in both London 1968 and Birmingham 1968 dialling code books as 0325 78 which means that it was directly diallable from most of the UK in 1968. Thus the number would have been 0325 78 408 from at least 1968. Unfortunately I don't have the prized GPO yearly 'green books' which list all the exchanges giving exchange type and other detailed info but from the number I expect it was a Strowger (electromechanical) UAX12 at that time with up to 400 lines and numbers in the range 2XX-5XX. In November 1989 North Cowton is still listed as 0325 78 in my copy of the Code Decoder for that year but it is no longer listed in the May 1990 London dialling code book which means that it was probably converted to an electronic exchange circa 1990. That is when the number would've become 6 digits on STD Code 0325 and swallowed up into the linked numbering scheme (LNS) with the new North Cowton exchange becoming a Darlington remote concentrator unit (RCU) and disappearing from the directories forever. Most often the new 6 figure number was made up of the old two digit local code from the GSC i.e. in this case 78 from Darlington, a padding digit, usually 0 or 1 and the old three figure number so the complete new number might've been 0325 780408 or 0325 781408. However, it all depended upon availablility of equipment and it was often more expedient to allocate spare levels at the GSC so the new number could have been 0325 7X/8X 0/1 408 where X was any digit e.g. 0325 831408. Thus it had been many years since North Cowton 8 had existed, I would suggest at least 20 and probably 30 as many UAXs were installed in the 1950s to convert rural manual exchanges!
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 28, 2011 5:55:11 GMT
Could be, I thought the number was (01) 557 0194, but on thinking about it, could that have been Capital Radio as was? There's a confusion because it's a number I remember, Capital wasn't launched until 1973, and it was 194 on the dial, and I would have been 5 at the time. That said, all the frequencies changed in 78 or so, and I moved here in 83.... With the mod hat on, we'll keep this thread as it's running right now, and as it slips down the list, switch the threads and move accordingly.As I said there never was an 01-557 exchange, 557 was what one dialled in London to reach the Overseas Telegram Operator. Although that code changed in later years and would've been available there was no 01-557 exchange as late as 1986 I have to correct myself here!Checking my 1990 London Code Book for something else I noticed that London exchange codes are listed giving details of the change from 01 to 071 or 081 on 6th May and 557 appears in that list, however, there was no 557 exchange in 1986 so it must've been commissioned between 1986 and 1990 as 01-557. Out of interest I also note that 528, 895, 945, 975 and 982 exchanges are all shown as Mercury Comms exchanges each having numbers with both 071 and 081 codes! Edited to add that 557 was a Mercury Communications Ltd exchange rather than a BT exchange !
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Nov 28, 2011 6:16:08 GMT
I wonder what the shortest existing number would be now, excluding area code. Sure that not too long back I saw a six digit area code for somewhere up north, wonder if theres a seven digit one anywhere... EDIT: Brampton, Cumbria, last place to have 4 digit (though it has 5 digit aswell) local numbers; Area code 016977, subscriber numbers 2xxx and 3xxx. And a few other places across the country have 6 digit area codes aswell, though not many. The 01697 area has been a bone of contention for many years as the Ofcom listing was wrong until quite recently and was the subject of endless discussion on telecoms forums, as I mentioned elsewhere don't take Ofcom as gospel even though it is in charge of allocating codes! I note that Ofcom no longer publish the telephone numbering plan with details of telcos' allocations as they used to and apparently all geographic numbers are now 11 digits including the '0' access digit!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 28, 2011 9:55:53 GMT
In November 1989 North Cowton is still listed as 0325 78 in my copy of the Code Decoder for that year but it is no longer listed in the May 1990 London dialling code book which means that it was probably converted to an electronic exchange circa 1990. That is when the number would've become 6 digits on STD Code 0325 and swallowed up into the linked numbering scheme (LNS) with the new North Cowton exchange becoming a Darlington remote concentrator unit (RCU) and disappearing from the directories forever. Most often the new 6 figure number was made up of the old two digit local code from the GSC i.e. in this case 78 from Darlingt on, a padding digit, usually 0 or 1 and the old three figure number so the complete new number might've been 0325 780408 or 0325 781408. However, it all depended upon availablility of equipment and it was often more expedient to allocate spare levels at the GSC so the new number could have been 0325 7X/8X 0/1 408 where X was any digit e.g. 0325 831408. About 1990 seem right from my memories. The 78 from Darlington was used, but the three digit numbers became 6 digit numbers with the addition of 378 so North Cowton 408 became Darlington 378 408.
|
|