Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2011 11:05:05 GMT
I'm pretty sure it's at Waterloo I noticed this. The TBTC cables that have been installed are nothing like on the Bank branch! They were at the bottom of the pit, with more of an X shaped crossover than the usual straight one. I assume this is a total screw-up by Tube Lines yet again?
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Oct 25, 2011 16:44:51 GMT
I bet they have laid the wrong cabling the same thing happened on the Jubilee line when the upgrade first started. The Northern line is much bigger than the Jubilee line I hope they don't make the same screw up they made with the Jubilee! I hope TBTC is turned on in sections and not all at once like the Jubilee line this is what made the upgrade take so long.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Oct 25, 2011 18:30:12 GMT
Is it a possible WIP in that things will be tidied up at a later time, and engineering hours aren't sufficient?
Can't imagine that they'd stay bottom of the pit for a variety of reasons, most of all the potential for arcing if there's a power surge (?)
Question mark because that would depend on the insulation, and power strengths.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2011 19:30:42 GMT
Normally they're across the cut ends of the sleepers. On the DLR the cables are raised in the centre, on the Jubilee they're across the trackbed, or closer to the -ve rail.
There won't be enough cable if it was cut down to length to the loops.
The Bank branch has the cabling done in the same fashion as the Jubilee line and I'd imagine the trains would have a hard time picking up the TBTC signals that far below the juice!
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Oct 25, 2011 19:37:41 GMT
Not seen, so can't really comment - Maybe it is all just getting shoved through on the cheap? AIUI, it's behind schedule anyway (But then what isn't?)
I can ask the question of someone I "know" on Twitter that works the Northern.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2011 19:50:11 GMT
Maybe because TFL have made the rediculous decision to only install and test in engineering hours they haven't got time to run the cable and secure it in its final location in one go.
The guys installing this cable have been doing it since the start of the project, so it's not going to be an error.
The loop cable I have seen at Waterloo Northbound looks fine and the same as elsewhere in station pit areas, except the cable is clipped just inside the pit rather than on top of it.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Oct 25, 2011 20:12:31 GMT
Engineering hours are very short though, and you only have to look here at the amount of people moaning about closures - Damned if you do, damned if you don't!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2011 20:33:00 GMT
SE13 - I agree with your summing up of the situation. I think now the decision has been made to do practically everything in pure engineering hours, I won't be expecting to see a NL train in passenger service under TBTC for some years!
|
|
|
Post by br7mt on Oct 25, 2011 21:24:10 GMT
We have a few other tricks up our sleeve to take the pain out of the NL upgrade. For example - the Highgate Test Facility is being significantly extended in length so that more meaningful testing can be done on it. Late start up is also commencing on the High Barnet branch every Sunday to give a bit more time in Engineering Hours.
You are right though that TBTC passenger service is a long way off yet.
Regards,
Dan
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Oct 26, 2011 7:42:33 GMT
I'm pretty sure it's at Waterloo I noticed this. The TBTC cables that have been installed are nothing like on the Bank branch! They were at the bottom of the pit, with more of an X shaped crossover than the usual straight one. I assume this is a total screw-up by Tube Lines yet again? I can't recall the arrangement at Waterloo so can't comment on the specifics, however the process for laying the loop cable takes place over time. Firstly the cables are run through the tunnels, and then later they are moved to their final position. I suspect you will find the cables will be moved to their final position as work progresses. They are still a real pain when walking the tunnels though!
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 18, 2011 18:11:02 GMT
I read in a rail magazine that that the First section to be switched on is Morden to Kennington apparently in 2012 and Highgate to High Barnet will be used as a testing ground for the trains in Passanger service. When they get TBTC fully up and running they want to use Protected Manual then convert the whole line to ATO in one weekend! Good luck with that Delays here we come!
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Dec 18, 2011 19:03:04 GMT
The whole line was supposed to have gone ATO earlier this month. Expect nothing and you won't be disappointed!
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 18, 2011 19:46:37 GMT
Very True!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2011 23:39:46 GMT
The cables at Bank were loose and in the pit when first placed - they were tidied up within a week though.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 19, 2011 17:20:58 GMT
I may sound like a doomster here but I think this Upgrade is going to be a right mess and will take forver to finally be finished. On the Edgeware branch the loop cable has not even been installed yet from what I have heard only preperation for it.
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Dec 19, 2011 17:35:54 GMT
You cannot expect cable to be laid, adjusted and secured over night. Cable runs are one of the easiest but nightmare-ish jobs. Cabling is laid out in a 'free form' state at first, when all the meter-age's are correct the cabling shall be secured and wired up to their junction boxes/terminals etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2011 22:16:03 GMT
I'm pretty sure it's at Waterloo I noticed this. The TBTC cables that have been installed are nothing like on the Bank branch! They were at the bottom of the pit, with more of an X shaped crossover than the usual straight one. I assume this is a total screw-up by Tube Lines yet again? I saw a photo of a section that looks like this last week and have just seen this thread again. It looks like a short section of loop has been incorrectly installed. It should be at the top of the pit and, as you say, the crossovers are wrong. Will need to be fixed. The cabling is installed by Thales though not Tube Lines.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2011 22:19:07 GMT
I may sound like a doomster here but I think this Upgrade is going to be a right mess and will take forver to finally be finished. On the Edgeware branch the loop cable has not even been installed yet from what I have heard only preperation for it. Yes you do sound like a doomster and not sure what evidence you have for your claim it will be a right mess. The Edgware branch is to be the last to be commissioned with TBTC so at the earliest will be mid to late 2013 so there isn't a need for the loop to have been laid here yet.
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Dec 20, 2011 0:39:41 GMT
Yes you do sound like a doomster and not sure what evidence you have for your claim it will be a right mess. Like most things on here, because it is far easier to argue against something than for it. I know the cables you mean. Or they may have worked out that they can still get the loops to generate signal that far down in the pit and in that fashion. Would be interesting to know as I have noticed it too.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 20, 2011 8:34:29 GMT
Well it might go ok but the Jubilee line upgrade has made me had my doubts and even when it does get switched on. How reliable will this system be? The TBTC still sometimes fail on the Jubilee line. However though all signaling upgrades are genrally a mess anyway! Even the Central lines upgrade was late and that was before PPP!
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Dec 20, 2011 13:19:54 GMT
Jardine01, I assume that you are a railway professional holding such views?
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 20, 2011 15:29:45 GMT
I am not a railway professional compared to some people on here. As in a earlier post it is easy to say your views on a forum. The Northern line upgrade should go well if there is no set backs and is well planned. The Jubilee line upgrade was a mess but thats tube lines fault. I am sure once the Northern line gets TBTC it will be fine in the end.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2011 19:43:23 GMT
As a regular northern line passenger who has been using the line for years and 4/5 days a week in the morning peak for the past four months, I have to say the current service provided on the line is very robust and I’ve never experienced any significant hold ups in the four months. IIRC it was even the most reliable on LU not so long ago and could still be. If the upgrades are late, I'm not bothered, what we get now is very reasonable and it would be great if TBTC improves it slightly. Jardine01, I assume that you are a railway professional holding such views? You don't really have to be a "professional" to understand what jardine has mentioned. Anyone can research facts on the internet and experience such things as a passenger.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2011 1:21:09 GMT
Just correcting what was said earlier in the thread, the first section to switch over to TBTC will be High Barnet to West Finchley. And each section will open with ATO from the beginning, there won't be a later changeover from Protected Manual operation to ATO.
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Dec 21, 2011 8:59:17 GMT
I don't think anyone can argue that the installation of the Jubilee upgrade was anything other than a foul-up. It took ages, left huge swathes of people without trains for long periods of time and did not deliver a reliable service after installation for a long time after it was supposedly complete.
Whilst there are a number of reasons for that, I don't think simply questionning someone's credentials as a "qualifed railway professional" (whatever one of those is) when they express concern about the likely problems with the Northern Line installation is helpful. I haven't seen any evidence that lessons have actually been learned from the Jubilee. I've seen lots of management people saying lessons have been learned, but that's not the same thing at all.
Yes Tubelines won't be doing it, but I'd like to know (1) who the contractors doing the work are, (2) how this differs from the Jubilee, (3) how much project management time has been spent and who has tested and verified all the timings/pricings for the jobs, (4) what qualifications and experience of successful underground projects the management team of all parties have. Unless these are better than the jubilee line, then from my professional experience, I wouldn't expect any improvement.
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Dec 21, 2011 9:00:17 GMT
I don't think anyone can argue that the installation of the Jubilee upgrade was anything other than a foul-up. It took ages, left huge swathes of people without trains for long periods of time and did not deliver a reliable service after installation for a long time after it was supposedly complete.
Whilst there are a number of reasons for that, I don't think simply questionning someone's credentials as a "qualifed railway professional" (whatever one of those is) when they express concern about the likely problems with the Northern Line installation is helpful. I haven't seen any evidence that lessons have actually been learned from the Jubilee. I've seen lots of management people saying lessons have been learned, but that's not the same thing at all.
Yes Tubelines won't be doing it, but I'd like to know (1) who the contractors doing the work are, (2) how this differs from the Jubilee, (3) how much project management time has been spent and who has tested and verified all the timings/pricings for the jobs, (4) what qualifications and experience of successful underground projects the management team of all parties have. Unless these are better than the jubilee line, then from my professional experience, I wouldn't expect any improvement.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 21, 2011 9:35:42 GMT
When the line goes ATO section by Section I hope they don't do it like the Jubilee line did like most of the line goes ATO in one go due to setbacks. They must drive in Protected Manual before ATO they have to make sure TBTC is safe & reliable before they can even think about going ATO. When TBTC went into operation on the Jubilee line it was in protected Manual for a few days and gradually brought in ATO. I think lessons have been learned but its a complex signaling system and probally even more complex than the Jubilee line. Thales is Doing the upgrade for the Northern.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2011 21:54:52 GMT
Whilst there are a number of reasons for that, I don't think simply questionning someone's credentials as a "qualifed railway professional" (whatever one of those is) when they express concern about the likely problems with the Northern Line installation is helpful. I haven't seen any evidence that lessons have actually been learned from the Jubilee. I've seen lots of management people saying lessons have been learned, but that's not the same thing at all. Yes Tubelines won't be doing it, but I'd like to know (1) who the contractors doing the work are, (2) how this differs from the Jubilee, (3) how much project management time has been spent and who has tested and verified all the timings/pricings for the jobs, (4) what qualifications and experience of successful underground projects the management team of all parties have. Unless these are better than the jubilee line, then from my professional experience, I wouldn't expect any improvement. Not sure what lessons you would expect to see widely visible (i.e. to customers) at this stage ? Some examples - less closures, keeping the migration to smaller sections, ensuring ATO is available when each section is switched on, not wasting time with a dual-fitted area, changing the contract with Thales, bringing Tube Lines in house, carrying out in service monitoring of key system components. Tube Lines will be delivering the project, just from within the TfL group and without the "help" of Bechtel who were supposed to be the experts you refer to. Thales is still, obviously, the signalling contractor.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 23, 2011 22:45:16 GMT
I think closures will happen frequently and there is a big shut down over easter time I think. Unfortantly this upgrade we probally won't see any increase in speeds due to the curves on the line. Is the Northern line going to have a dual fitted area? However less closures means less work will be done which is going to make this upgrade finish later. Some people would probally shoot me for saying this but I think they should most of the line for a few weeks and get as much work done as possible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2011 9:47:45 GMT
Found this along with Tfl's explanation, 'Now we're at the final hurdle which involves a lot of testing and checking of equipment so it's much better to have a big chunk of time to do this in.' !presumably this only refers to The High Barnet branch but I see from Tfl's track closure schdule, there are still lots more late morning openings rolling into June 2012... but can anyone clarify the facts from the fiction? I.E. how far along is the upgrade at the moment?
|
|