|
Post by 1018509 on Jul 20, 2011 21:32:58 GMT
On route indicator signals why are two out of three indicators of each indicator joined like in this example? tinyurl.com/5vftnn3
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 21, 2011 0:55:11 GMT
Saves space and light bulbs.
Technically they're not route indicators - although they indicate a route ;D - they're junction indicators or feathers.
The feather would be proved lit before the signal will shew a green if a diverging route is set - obviously common blubs between routes (I think they're called 'pivot lamps' but I might well be thinking of something else this time of night) will be proved lit separately to the others in that particular feather, but the proving will be arranged that both are in the feed to the green in series.
There's a bit more detail than that, but I wouldn't want to bore you with UECRs.
|
|
|
Post by edwardfox on Jul 21, 2011 3:17:04 GMT
I'm sure I've seen a train move past a signal with the directional thingy lit up but the actual signal itself still showing red. Is this possible?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2011 4:39:26 GMT
I'm sure I've seen a train move past a signal with the directional thingy lit up but the actual signal itself still showing red. Is this possible? I do hope not!
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jul 21, 2011 6:19:36 GMT
I'm sure I've seen a train move past a signal with the directional thingy lit up but the actual signal itself still showing red. Is this possible? Most definitely not in normal operation. However, I can visualise a failure situation where such a signal might be passed under rule with permission if the signal itself had failed to clear due to say a signal relay failure. Of course the train would be tripped and the tripcock have to be reset to proceed.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jul 21, 2011 7:06:38 GMT
I'm sure I've seen a train move past a signal with the directional thingy lit up but the actual signal itself still showing red. Is this possible? I don't know so much about TfL signalling, but on NR the feathers can't show unless there is a proceed aspect. What you do sometimes see is a "calling on" signal, which allows entry to an occupied section - for example to allow a locomotive to couple to its train. My recollection is that the train is brought to a stand at the red signal, and only then is the calling-on aspect lit - the main signal remains red.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2011 8:15:40 GMT
Logically (what a dangerous word to use when you discuss about signalling!) the feathers are linked with the fact that the route (the point) is set in the indicated direction. This must be assessed before the signal is open. At least on the French railways.
If the route is set and if the next block section is still occupied, the red light must logically still be on. Same in the case of trackl circuit failure, hence the exceptional oreder to proceed in such a case.
Still with French railways, once the route indicator (white lights) is set, the main signal would commute from "carré" (two red lignts) to "sémaphore" (one red), the latter being allowed to be passed after a halt and at very reduced speed.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 21, 2011 9:35:05 GMT
Still with French railways, once the route indicator (white lights) is set, the main signal would commute from "carré" (two red lignts) to "sémaphore" (one red), the latter being allowed to be passed after a halt and at very reduced speed. One oeilleton lit below turns a signal 'franchissable' - either a carré acting as a sémaphore or if all lights are out except the oeilleton to proceed 'marché à vue', IIR Les signaux lumineaux unifés C, yes? Above, the number of oeilletons lit above indicates the divergence, I think - yesno? The proving is relaxed compared to the English systems, as the French way is partially 'speed' signalled - think of your advertissment, ralentissment and rappel de ralentissment as you approach the divergence, compared to British 'route' working - there are those that argue the British feux clignotant jaune are a form of 'weak' speed signalling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2011 12:21:11 GMT
I have had a failure that involved a signal at danger but with a junction route indicator showing a route! Rather than securing up points and what not, as the route ahead showed a proceed aspect, the trains were just sent on to reverse someplace else until it was fixed. That's up there with 'my strangest faults'!
|
|
|
Post by 1018509 on Jul 21, 2011 20:35:53 GMT
Thanks for all the replies and technicalities but I'm afraid my question was far more basic than the answers would suggest.
What I intended to mean was why are the top two two lights of each feather joined by that black metal plate connecting the hoods of each light?
|
|
|
Post by causton on Jul 21, 2011 21:16:38 GMT
So no light could get between the two - forming a false "feather"?
|
|
|
Post by 1018509 on Jul 21, 2011 21:34:19 GMT
Another question. Is one light out on a feather a signal failure?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2011 22:22:05 GMT
Another question. Is one light out on a feather a signal failure? No. It is still a valid proceed signal (but of course should be reported)
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 21, 2011 22:41:00 GMT
Thanks for all the replies and technicalities but I'm afraid my question was far more basic than the answers would suggest. What I intended to mean was why are the top two two lights of each feather joined by that black metal plate connecting the hoods of each light? That's easy to answer - basically you've got a source of light that needs a contrast. What you're talking about is a backboard - essentially the same as a sightscreen in cricket lets you see the ball more easily against at constant white background, the black of the backboard allows the Motorman to 'spot' the signal. Bear with me and l might be able give you a pictorial example - signals in the tunnels don't have the backboards as it's already black (and to save space). Sounds obvious when you know the reason. I'll try and sort out a picture when I get home.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 21, 2011 23:47:58 GMT
Right then. We have a signal: and Ok, so it's not a feather, nor is it an UndergrounD signal - but it will illustrate the point. Those lenses are 5" diameter, now the optical system is optimised, and the lenses [1] will try and create a beam of nearly collimated light [1] better if the lens is a stepped fresnel doublet, rather than this example. This signal would work fine in tunnel - all that would need to happen is that the beam is closely aligned to the line of sight of the T/Op to allow an early view (and allow for both human reaction time and braking to kick in). Imagine now, trying to spot that signal in broad daylight against a moving background - sky, buildings, trees whatever that change as the train moves - it is really quite difficult - especially if the signal stays at the same aspect on approach - the human eye will however note a change, so it aspect steps up or down then the brain will register that. Signal designers thought long and hard about this, and ended up with a backboard - ta-daaa!: The keen-eyed will not a similarity with the older signals on the Met and the District - this is because this signal is made by the Union Switch and Signal Company, who were essentially BPRS and Westinghouse in the UK and the firm that provided these for the Met and MDR. The signal is itself a VR design from 1920 - right at the very dawn of light signalling in that continent - there is one large hood: Signals like this are around the northern side of the circle - Farringdonia and also near Hammersmith. In the ebb and flow of signalling design single and multiple hoods have alternately fell into and out of favour, single hoods seem to be coming back with certain types of LED lamp.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2011 19:10:54 GMT
I don't know so much about TfL signalling, but on NR the feathers can't show unless there is a proceed aspect. I'm afraid you've got that wrong. On NR at least 3 of the 5 five feather lights have to be proved lit before a proceed aspect can be displayed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2011 23:13:58 GMT
I'm sure I've seen a train move past a signal with the directional thingy lit up but the actual signal itself still showing red. Is this possible? Yes, if it's a shunt signal rather than a feather - as at West Croydon platform 4, where the 378s proceed into the reversing siding after detraining.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2011 23:19:15 GMT
I'm sure I've seen a train move past a signal with the directional thingy lit up but the actual signal itself still showing red. Is this possible? Yes, if it's a shunt signal rather than a feather - as at West Croydon platform 4, where the 378s proceed into the reversing siding after detraining. I can't think of any examples on LU at the moment. Where a stop signal with a junction route indicator also has a shunt signal provided. The shunt has its own theatre type route indicator if so required.
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Jul 23, 2011 4:54:35 GMT
The OP still hasn't got the answer to it's question directly I think. If you look at a junction indicator head on, using an x, y and z axis where x is left to right, y is up and down and z is closer and farther; I think to OP is referring to a metal plate in the z axis linking the hoods of the top and middle white lights. Although I think the reason for this is the same as what's been explained regarding backplates.
|
|
|
Post by 1018509 on Jul 23, 2011 19:20:09 GMT
Got it v52gc the question I was asking is exactly as you put it.
I don't think it's the backboard issue because the backboard is there anyway regardless of these plates I am talking about.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 23, 2011 23:26:35 GMT
Ah. Remember what I said upthread about US&S.......
Well, if I remember my US signalling history correctly, it is tied in with the early versions of the Pennsylvania RR position light signals.
I might have a note on this somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Jul 24, 2011 5:39:39 GMT
It's like an interesting history lesson!
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Jul 24, 2011 7:39:41 GMT
Yes, if it's a shunt signal rather than a feather - as at West Croydon platform 4, where the 378s proceed into the reversing siding after detraining. I can't think of any examples on LU at the moment. Where a stop signal with a junction route indicator also has a shunt signal provided. The shunt has its own theatre type route indicator if so required. Acton town platform 4 station starter has a multi route shunt signal under a colour light junction signal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2011 8:24:05 GMT
I can't think of any examples on LU at the moment. Where a stop signal with a junction route indicator also has a shunt signal provided. The shunt has its own theatre type route indicator if so required. Acton town platform 4 station starter has a multi route shunt signal under a colour light junction signal. But I mean that the colour light signal is a JRI and the shunt a Theatre Type RI...
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jul 24, 2011 14:53:41 GMT
Acton town platform 4 station starter has a multi route shunt signal under a colour light junction signal. But I mean that the colour light signal is a JRI and the shunt a Theatre Type RI... Yep that's a tricky one, I can't ever recall seeing a 'full post' so to speak with signals for diverging main routes and diverging subsidiary routes. There are of course plenty of sites with diverging main routes and single shunt route or single main route with multiple shunt routes. Where diverging main routes and diverging shunt routes are available it is more usual to see a junction indicator and single shunt signal at the main signal with a further shunt and theatre sign further ahead, the latter having to be cleared before the shunt on the main signal post can be cleared.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 24, 2011 15:49:09 GMT
But I mean that the colour light signal is a JRI and the shunt a Theatre Type RI... Yep that's a tricky one, I can't ever recall seeing a 'full post' so to speak with signals for diverging main routes and diverging subsidiary routes. There were until recently these: At Neasden. WER1053 has a two-position theatre on the main, remote secure visual and two-position theatre on the disc.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jul 24, 2011 19:35:43 GMT
Yep that's a tricky one, I can't ever recall seeing a 'full post' so to speak with signals for diverging main routes and diverging subsidiary routes. There were until recently these: At Neasden. WER1053 has a two-position theatre on the main, remote secure visual and two-position theatre on the disc. Blimey, that just shows how my memory is fading, and it's embarassing! I just can't visualise those sticks at all. I did the lever frame cleaning regularly at Neasden right up until my retirement but I worked there for years on and off as I installed/commissioned the SPTs on the 1980s resignalling jobs all along the Met & Jubilee from Baker Street to Stanmore and indeed was maintaining the Jubilee sites until I retired. However, I can only recall covering the call depot at Neasden a couple of times although I also did point maintenance there in the years before I had to give up trackwork.
|
|