Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2011 14:39:22 GMT
I do hope this is the right board on which to ask about a couple of manoeuvers (if that's the spelling.. and the correct term?!)
Firstly - what is the procedure for a train exiting one of the Triangle (169 side) bays? I presume they must travel into High St Ken and recently I saw a train that looked like it was shunting/driving into platform 2 from that direction.
I couldn't tell whether a train would go "wrong road" all the way along the same track that is used for westbound HST-ECT journeys (I couldn't see a crossover to get over to the adjacent track) - or if it crosses over to the left (that track coming from ECT) and then approaches pfm2 crossing over at "EV" as would any other from that direction. (Not sure if that's technically called a "double crossover" but that sounded right?)
Secondly - while on a train leaving ECT pfm3 and heading to West Brompton I wondered - could a unit ever leave pfm4 and cross to the right, but then continue towards Wimbledon along that right hand track?
It occurred to me that in the event of a blockage or build-up on the usual left-hand track between ECT pfm4 and WBT there would be no other way to get trains from High St Ken down to Wimbledon. It may not be a likely or common route, but I did wonder if it was technically possible a route could be set that way.
I'm grateful for any info - and, as always, apologies either of these questions are "daft" or phrased in an amateurish way - the only way to learn is to risk it!
Thanks
karona
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jun 27, 2011 16:55:03 GMT
This would have been equally at home in the District board, but here is fine Now let's give you some answers: Firstly - what is the procedure for a train exiting one of the Triangle (169 side) bays? I presume they must travel into High St Ken and recently I saw a train that looked like it was shunting/driving into platform 2 from that direction. Not sure what you mean by 169 side, but yes, all movements from Triangle sidings are to platform 2, 3 or 4 at High Street Kensington. I couldn't tell whether a train would go "wrong road" all the way along the same track that is used for westbound HST-ECT journeys (I couldn't see a crossover to get over to the adjacent track) - or if it crosses over to the left (that track coming from ECT) and then approaches pfm2 crossing over at "EV" as would any other from that direction. (Not sure if that's technically called a "double crossover" but that sounded right?) EV? nope, you've lost me From the siding on the left (as you travel Eastbound from Earls Court to High Street), you simply join the Eastbound track and follow the same signalling as any other train. From the sidings on the right, there is indeed a crossover in the tunnel which will route you over to the Eastbound track and thus you'll be signalled into High Street as per any other train. Secondly - while on a train leaving ECT pfm3 and heading to West Brompton I wondered - could a unit ever leave pfm4 and cross to the right, but then continue towards Wimbledon along that right hand track? Dead easy; no - that is not a signalled move. It occurred to me that in the event of a blockage or build-up on the usual left-hand track between ECT pfm4 and WBT there would be no other way to get trains from High St Ken down to Wimbledon. It may not be a likely or common route, but I did wonder if it was technically possible a route could be set that way. As you now know, it's not "technically possible". As you correctly assumed; if the route from Platform 4 to Wimbledon is unavailable there would be no service directly from High Street to West Brompton. I'm grateful for any info - and, as always, apologies either of these questions are "daft" or phrased in an amateurish way - the only way to learn is to risk it! Indeed - the only only silly question is the one you don't ask!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2011 21:03:48 GMT
Excellent - a much appreciated and comprehensive explanation, Colin. All the mysteries are being cleared up one by one. I remember a time when I didn't even understand how two trains could leave ECT for Wimbledon simultaneously! Just to clarify re "EV" & "169" - I had (probably mistakenly) imagined that the codes which appear on signal room photos were common reference terms to identify areas - not that I'd expect anyone to carry all the codes in their heads. For instance in this image: www.anorakheaven.com/photos/ect_cr33.jpg169 is written next to the "bays" on one side of Triangle. EV is the stretch of track seen just after signal ED23. I presumed those codes must be documented on track maps/in books elsewhere but I've never found out where! "Answers on a postcode...". Incidentally I note ED23 has three routes - route 1 = into pfm3, route 2 = into pfm4, route 3 = info pfm2. I can't imagine how that the route indicator shows this clearly on the signal head (not that I "need" to know - just curious!) Thanks as always for the enlightenment - hope it's useful info for other curious folk too. karona
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 27, 2011 21:50:27 GMT
Incidentally I note ED23 has three routes - route 1 = into pfm3, route 2 = into pfm4, route 3 = info pfm2. I can't imagine how that the route indicator shows this clearly on the signal head (not that I "need" to know - just curious!) The route indicator at ED23 is a tunnel version of this: tinyurl.com/5vftnn3 (courtesy of 21146) straight green: into pfm4 45deg: into pfm3 90deg into pfm2.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jun 27, 2011 22:03:41 GMT
Apologies for the OT, but the pic of WD43 et al, is there a WD40 somewhere?
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Jun 27, 2011 22:10:03 GMT
Apologies for the OT, but the pic of WD43 et al, is there a WD40 somewhere? Yes, most hardware stores and garage supllies sell it! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 27, 2011 22:25:11 GMT
Apologies for the OT, but the pic of WD43 et al, is there a WD40 somewhere? Unfortunately, there isn't!! There are WD40A, WD40B and WD40C though, (between Barons Court and Hammersmith)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2011 22:35:03 GMT
Great - thank you Dstock7080! (+17080+8080?) - very helpful to see that photo! Apologies for the OT, but the pic of WD43 et al, is there a WD40 somewhere? Well Dstock7080 got there first... but I had wondered about that before and suspected maybe the reason there's WD40A,40B,40C in that little section is in case one seizes up... due to lack of WD40 boom boom
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2011 22:43:10 GMT
Just to clarify re "EV" & "169" - I had (probably mistakenly) imagined that the codes which appear on signal room photos were common reference terms to identify areas - not that I'd expect anyone to carry all the codes in their heads. For instance in this image: www.anorakheaven.com/photos/ect_cr33.jpg169 is written next to the "bays" on one side of Triangle. EV is the stretch of track seen just after signal ED23. I presumed those codes must be documented on track maps/in books elsewhere but I've never found out where! "Answers on a postcode...". 169 is the lever number for the lever in IMR 'ED' that controls the three outlet shunt signals from the three sidings to the northbound District. The same number is shared by all three signals because this particular frame uses route lever principles in this area, and when 169's is rotated reverse, the correct shunt signal drops based upon the lie of the points in the route. I'm not certain how this is done in the circuitry, but at a minimum a series of electrical track locks and point blade ground locks (possibly including FPLs?) must be proved in each set of points and track circuits up to the limit of control for 169's in order for any of the three signals to clear. railtechnician would probably be able to explain it far better than I ever could. "EV" is the name of the particular track circuit in the area of the trailing crossover north of the points leading to the sidings. All track circuits on traditionally-signalled lines have a two or three letter code that uniquely identifies them within the controlled area supported by the IMR/SER (in this case, IMR 'ED'). These track circuit names are probably tracked (no pun) in the same set of documents as the master plans for the entire layout; BAET would know about that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2011 23:16:18 GMT
re the levers - very interesting.. thanks!
re track circuit identifiers - as well as the letter codes some seem to have numbers, certainly on District growing from west to east with odd numbers on the Eastbound track and even numbers on the Westbound - but the two types are intermingled and I'm not sure if even that tells me anything about the individual track sections.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jun 28, 2011 7:23:04 GMT
Just to clarify re "EV" & "169" - I had (probably mistakenly) imagined that the codes which appear on signal room photos were common reference terms to identify areas - not that I'd expect anyone to carry all the codes in their heads. For instance in this image: www.anorakheaven.com/photos/ect_cr33.jpg169 is written next to the "bays" on one side of Triangle. EV is the stretch of track seen just after signal ED23. I presumed those codes must be documented on track maps/in books elsewhere but I've never found out where! "Answers on a postcode...". 169 is the lever number for the lever in IMR 'ED' that controls the three outlet shunt signals from the three sidings to the northbound District. The same number is shared by all three signals because this particular frame uses route lever principles in this area, and when 169's is rotated reverse, the correct shunt signal drops based upon the lie of the points in the route. I'm not certain how this is done in the circuitry, but at a minimum a series of electrical track locks and point blade ground locks (possibly including FPLs?) must be proved in each set of points and track circuits up to the limit of control for 169's in order for any of the three signals to clear. railtechnician would probably be able to explain it far better than I ever could. "EV" is the name of the particular track circuit in the area of the trailing crossover north of the points leading to the sidings. All track circuits on traditionally-signalled lines have a two or three letter code that uniquely identifies them within the controlled area supported by the IMR/SER (in this case, IMR 'ED'). These track circuit names are probably tracked (no pun) in the same set of documents as the master plans for the entire layout; BAET would know about that. Yep 169A, 169B and 169C are all on the same lever so there is just one feed to clear the appropriate stick. This feed is routed to the appropriate shunt signal valve according to the lie of the points. Points are normal or reverse and their indicating relays similarly operate normal or reverse in correspondence. The required route is basically obtained by seriesing the necessary contacts of these and other relays (e.g. fouling track relays proved up) to select the signal. This is known as 'signal selection' and for 169 lever there are three selections from the same feed each of which mutually excludes the other too. The track circuit allocations are shown on the signalling scale plans as well as on the signal operator diagrams and are of course shown in the various signal strip prints and bookwirings too.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jun 28, 2011 7:31:30 GMT
Incidentally I note ED23 has three routes - route 1 = into pfm3, route 2 = into pfm4, route 3 = info pfm2. I can't imagine how that the route indicator shows this clearly on the signal head (not that I "need" to know - just curious!) karona Signal routes read from the left, route 1 is into platform 4, route 2 into platform 3 and route 1 into platform 2. So it's green only for route 1, green and 45 degree harbour lights for route 2 and green and 90 degree harbour lights for route 3. Before you ask this signal thus has three selections from the same feed each of which mutually excludes the other two based upon the lie of the points in the routes and anything else required. The harbour lights are also proved to be 'on' for example before the signal is cleared for route 2 or route 3. In the set of three white lamps for a route two of the three must be illuminated or the signal will not clear as the route light checking relay will not have picked up to complete the 'selection'.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jun 28, 2011 7:42:44 GMT
Just to clarify re "EV" & "169" - I had (probably mistakenly) imagined that the codes which appear on signal room photos were common reference terms to identify areas - not that I'd expect anyone to carry all the codes in their heads. To further clarify this bit.... Drivers do have to learn cabin codes of areas so that they know which signaller they are to deal with if communication is required, but there is no requirement to know all individual signal numbers (though I could tell you exactly where A681 is, or EC1 or ED23 or FF3, to name a few - some do stick in the memory for various reasons). Had you included the cabin code EC with the 169 reference, I'd have more than likely realised what you were referring to but when it comes to sidings, they are individually numbered under a different system to distinguish them. As for the EV track circuit, that is definitely something us drivers have no need to know. I did suspect that was what you were referring to but I have no way of checking without going onto a work PC and pulling up the relevant line diagram. At the time I saw your post and typed out the original reply, I was at home and so it was just far easier to dismiss it and use a far easier a explanation - besides, most people viewing this forum will never have access to such information so it benefits us all to keep questions & answers as easy to understand as possible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2011 7:53:37 GMT
Fair point re keeping questions clear to all.
Thanks to railtechnician for that additional info.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jun 28, 2011 7:58:27 GMT
re the levers - very interesting.. thanks! re track circuit identifiers - as well as the letter codes some seem to have numbers, certainly on District growing from west to east with odd numbers on the Eastbound track and even numbers on the Westbound - but the two types are intermingled and I'm not sure if even that tells me anything about the individual track sections. For purposes of identification a line is determined to be east and west regardless of its actual heading. As you have spotted westbound takes even numbers and eastbound odd numbers, the is the basic setup for a fully auto signalled line with signals beginning at one end i.e. A1 (eastbound) and A2 (westbound) and running in order to the other end say A399 and A400 but not necessarily continuous numbering as gaps are left for possible future alterations to track layour etc. The signal number is the basis of the track numbering thus the track beyond the replacing track for signal A123 might be expected to be A123a and the following tracks say A123b, A123c and perhaps A123d as the replacing track of the signal ahead, A125 and so on. The tracks beyond beginning A125a etc. However, where there are points the signals are semi-automatic and thus have to be controlled by a signal operator or other control. Signals in controlled areas take their identity from the 'cabin' or 'imr' which controls the area and tracks are lettered. Basically tracks run from A-Z through the site for a single track site but again there may be gaps. For a standard double track site the designations will generally be in alphabetical order on each road starting with A on one road and say L on the other although it simply depends on how many tracks are in the controlled area. For a complex site tracks may be AA-AZ on one road and BA-BZ on another and in four tracked areas the other two roads will use CA-CZ and DA-DZ. F,G & H followed by a second letter are usually allocated to sidings but it is not always the case. There are no hard and fast rules but there are basic principles to determining the various designations in any layout. In a controlled area the layout of the levers on the frame determines the numbers of the signals but the layout of the levers depends upon the layout of the track and the complexity or otherwise of the locking. Basically the track plan would be first followed by the signal to use the layout according to operating department wishes. Such wishes change over time and involve partial or sometimes full resignalling which obscures the original designation scheme somewhat as does the fitting of additional signals to mitigate hazards and events which were unforeseen in the original signalling design. When one works/has worked on the railway for a few years things are not too difficult to read but I do appreciate the difficulty of trying to do it at a distance without clear rules which I cannot give but perhaps Tom may explain further as he is a Principles man!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2011 10:48:39 GMT
When one works/has worked on the railway for a few years things are not too difficult to read but I do appreciate the difficulty of trying to do it at a distance without clear rules and I am really very grateful that you took the time to explain all of this so clearly. Those of us "outside" don't have any right or need to know about such things, but thankfully some kind souls on the "inside" do at least quench the thirst of those of us who enquire. Whether it is considered slightly obsessive to be interested in specific signals and stretches of track I'm not sure, but given that the public is supposedly endlessly interested in "details" like what Cheryl Cole had for breakfast, and what one reality show celebrity thinks of what another reality show celebrity is wearing - I don't feel so bad for wanting to know more about things which play a bigger part in our lives! Amen.
|
|