metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 21, 2011 18:52:18 GMT
Yes because if there is a problem in the city you would find it hard to reverse trains S-N from platform 2 with all the Met trains bailing out from the City or reversing plat 3 and back to plat 2 at Baker Street Junction through the chaos. Hopefully those points will return as you say.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 21, 2011 19:38:23 GMT
Indeed. Well the plan is to return them in 2013 - but I get the distinct feeling they won't be back until the full re-signalling, provided whoever does the planning for that remembers that they once existed.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Jun 21, 2011 19:49:12 GMT
Indeed. Well the plan is to return them in 2013 - but I get the distinct feeling they won't be back until the full re-signalling, provided whoever does the planning for that remembers that they once existed. I understand that the new layout, which reintroduces the ability to reverse S to N in platform 3 at Baker St will only be brought into use with the new ATC signalling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2011 20:35:03 GMT
I do hope that for late working commuters, the NB evening peak fast service to Amersham/Chesham doesn't revert to the new slow evening off-peak service until approx 2030 at Baker Street. I would also suggest that am peak fast services from Amersham/Chesham should continue until approx 0945 at the north end of the line. I should imagine the peak hours of operation will pretty much mirror todays The last SB train in the peak pattern ex C&L is the 9.20 Aldgate The NB peak at present effectively ends at 20.00 Baker St NB, with the exception of 1 extra Aldgate - Rickmansworth, 20.22 ex Baker
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 3, 2011 17:43:09 GMT
A poster has appeared concerning the Met train service that will be running on 11th Sept. Basically, it says that trains will be running at revised times and that the times were available on Journey Planner or by asking station staff.
There is nothing at all about the service being a trial for the forthcoming new off-peak service, nothing about service / stopping patterns that will be operating on that day and nothing about seeking customer feedback. Seems it a bit of a shame really and an opportunity missed? What do others think?
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 3, 2011 18:21:30 GMT
I believe that on the day there will be opportunity to give feedback. I think for the large majority of customers, it will be a case of waiting to see if they notice the difference. Now for Sunday customers, they are unlikely to notice - except they will have a full service for once.
The main test is to see if it "works" as a service - however ideally it would have been better to have a whole weekend (or a week) plus everything that normally interacts with the service actually running.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Sept 3, 2011 20:04:20 GMT
Trialing a MF service on a sunday and asking for passenger feedback, without mentioning that its to apply to MF? Someones clearly a fan of the BTC Passenger Survey approach... *-/
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 3, 2011 22:51:07 GMT
Maybe, but have we not seen examples of local press publications getting hold of news of the new timetable (it escapes me where the news appeared first ). Surely those who "care" about what service will operate will already know what is to change - and maybe know that 11th September is a test of the changes.
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 7, 2011 18:53:49 GMT
I believe that on the day there will be opportunity to give feedback. I think for the large majority of customers, it will be a case of waiting to see if they notice the difference. Now for Sunday customers, they are unlikely to notice - except they will have a full service for once. The main test is to see if it "works" as a service - however ideally it would have been better to have a whole weekend (or a week) plus everything that normally interacts with the service actually running. I would be very grateful if anyone in a position to do so could advise what the train numbering arrangements are for Sunday's trial of the planned new off-peak service. It will be particuarly interesting to see which services are self-contained. Thank you in anticipation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2011 19:30:10 GMT
I believe that on the day there will be opportunity to give feedback. I think for the large majority of customers, it will be a case of waiting to see if they notice the difference. Now for Sunday customers, they are unlikely to notice - except they will have a full service for once. The main test is to see if it "works" as a service - however ideally it would have been better to have a whole weekend (or a week) plus everything that normally interacts with the service actually running. I would be very grateful if anyone in a position to do so could advise what the train numbering arrangements are for Sunday's trial of the planned new off-peak service. It will be particuarly interesting to see which services are self-contained. Thank you in anticipation. all services are self contained with the exception of the Baker St terminators which arrive from UXB and return to WAT (and vice versa)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2011 22:24:43 GMT
I must say I do think it is a real shame that this new timetable change is adding around 7 minutes onto the journey time into Baker St. I have watched this thread grow and seen all sides of the story including the one put forward by metcontrol - I can see that its quite obvious some passengers campaigned for a better service in the Pinner area but surely anyone that looks at a railway line and sees journey times increasing sees this as a backwards step? With Project Evergreen 3 ongoing on the Chiltern Line seeing journey times from Wycombe to London reducing to around 25 minutes the Met line looks more and more disappointing. As much as I love using the line (especially as it's miles better value for money than the Chiltern Line) and more interesting - I feel sorry for the communters who will have hours added to the journey each week on top of the already quite long journey time from Amersham/Chesham. As a passenger, in my mind, in this day and age services should be getting quicker - not 7 minutes slower.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 8, 2011 7:17:46 GMT
all services are self contained with the exception of the Baker St terminators which arrive from UXB and return to WAT (and vice versa) Which is only almost half the timetable Not a good idea when you get trouble on one branch. There were reasons it was done, and it is hoped they will be overcome by 2013 ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 8, 2011 7:21:09 GMT
With Project Evergreen 3 ongoing on the Chiltern Line seeing journey times from Wycombe to London reducing to around 25 minutes the Met line looks more and more disappointing. The thing is, Chiltern are providing a competitive service against other services from London to Birmingham. The Met Line is a commuter service and should no longer be thought of as a "main line" service. However it is being done, we need to remember we are here to move people as efficiently as possible. Having mostly empty trains running down the fast off-peak is not efficient - even if it is nicer for the longer-distance Met customer. Let's also not forget that during the busiest times there will still be fast service to/from Amersham and Chesham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2011 8:26:20 GMT
With Project Evergreen 3 ongoing on the Chiltern Line seeing journey times from Wycombe to London reducing to around 25 minutes the Met line looks more and more disappointing. Having mostly empty trains running down the fast off-peak is not efficient Running them with 2 passengers on each one down the local lines is hardly efficient either ;D ;D I can pretty much guarantee that not all trains will be running on the 11th as we can't even manage a full Sunday service (when there is no engineering work) due to a lack of train operators.
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Sept 8, 2011 8:56:25 GMT
I would be very grateful if anyone in a position to do so could advise what the train numbering arrangements are for Sunday's trial of the planned new off-peak service. It will be particuarly interesting to see which services are self-contained. Thank you in anticipation. The exact train numbering is: 401 - 406: Chesham - Aldgate (six trains) 411 - 416: Amersham - Aldgate (six trains) 421 - 431: Uxbridge - Aldgate (nine trains) 441 - 456: Uxbridge/Watford - Baker Street (fourteen trains)
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Sept 8, 2011 13:37:38 GMT
You've been in the game too long, MC; youre starting to use management reasons!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 8, 2011 17:44:10 GMT
I would be very grateful if anyone in a position to do so could advise what the train numbering arrangements are for Sunday's trial of the planned new off-peak service. It will be particuarly interesting to see which services are self-contained. Thank you in anticipation. The exact train numbering is: 401 - 406: Chesham - Aldgate (six trains) 411 - 416: Amersham - Aldgate (six trains) 421 - 431: Uxbridge - Aldgate (nine trains) 441 - 456: Uxbridge/Watford - Baker Street (fourteen trains) So do the Uxbridge and Watford train rotate from one destination to the other? I can see this service getting totally screwed up which a cheeky signal failure at Farringdon! Where do the trains bolt to? 21 trains running into the city from different destinations is asking for trouble. Why don't we keep it simple!!!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 8, 2011 17:46:41 GMT
With Project Evergreen 3 ongoing on the Chiltern Line seeing journey times from Wycombe to London reducing to around 25 minutes the Met line looks more and more disappointing. The thing is, Chiltern are providing a competitive service against other services from London to Birmingham. The Met Line is a commuter service and should no longer be thought of as a "main line" service. However it is being done, we need to remember we are here to move people as efficiently as possible. Having mostly empty trains running down the fast off-peak is not efficient - even if it is nicer for the longer-distance Met customer. Let's also not forget that during the busiest times there will still be fast service to/from Amersham and Chesham. True, but it will not help the longivity of the rolling stock to be stop starting all the time rather than the lovely smooth runs on the fast sections. Remember when the all day service to Aldgate started....
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 8, 2011 17:57:18 GMT
You've been in the game too long, MC; youre starting to use management reasons! ;D ;D Yes, brainwashed ;D ;D Whilst I do sound like I'm seriously backing this new service, it has to be said that the "game" we are in these days has changed. The original values that the Met line ran for are changed. We can no longer run for Mr & Mrs Chesham or Amersham who demand fast services to London all day long - bypassing their fellow customers who are stuck on the local line.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 8, 2011 18:00:17 GMT
True, but it will not help the longivity of the rolling stock to be stop starting all the time rather than the lovely smooth runs on the fast sections. Remember when the all day service to Aldgate started.... Nobody can deny that the most recent timetables have probably seen the A-stocks off sooner than maybe they could have gone. However, their replacements are designed for such stop-start services in mind. I'm afraid that WTT 331 will not punish the S-stock and bring about their early demise ;D
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 8, 2011 19:51:38 GMT
I would be very grateful if anyone in a position to do so could advise what the train numbering arrangements are for Sunday's trial of the planned new off-peak service. It will be particuarly interesting to see which services are self-contained. Thank you in anticipation. The exact train numbering is: 401 - 406: Chesham - Aldgate (six trains) 411 - 416: Amersham - Aldgate (six trains) 421 - 431: Uxbridge - Aldgate (nine trains) 441 - 456: Uxbridge/Watford - Baker Street (fourteen trains) Thank you very much indeed Harsig.
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 8, 2011 20:13:28 GMT
The exact train numbering is: 401 - 406: Chesham - Aldgate (six trains) 411 - 416: Amersham - Aldgate (six trains) 421 - 431: Uxbridge - Aldgate (nine trains) 441 - 456: Uxbridge/Watford - Baker Street (fourteen trains) So do the Uxbridge and Watford train rotate from one destination to the other? Having had a look at the times on Journey Planner, I can confirm that they do. Trains terminating at BK ST from UXB at xx13, xx28, xx43 and xx58 form WAF trains departing at xx22, xx37, xx52 and xx07. Likewise, trains terminating at BK ST from WAT at xx02, xx17, x32 and xx47 form UXB trains departing at xx11, xx26, xx41 and xx56. As Harsig has advised, 14 trains are required for the above service pattern. Interestingly, I think I'm right in saying that the pattern of destinations for SB trains south of Harrow is going to be 2 x BK ST followed by 2 x ALD followed by 2 x BK ST, etc. I had thought it would be alternate but clearly such a pattern doesn't work from a timetabling perspective.
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 8, 2011 20:19:26 GMT
Having mostly empty trains running down the fast off-peak is not efficient Running them with 2 passengers on each one down the local lines is hardly efficient either ;D ;D I can pretty much guarantee that not all trains will be running on the 11th as we can't even manage a full Sunday service (when there is no engineering work) due to a lack of train operators. Oh dear! I see that 35 trains are needed for this new off-peak service compared with the current 33. Perhaps Sarah Siddons or the 1938 tube stock can cover any Met main cancellations on the 11th?
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Sept 8, 2011 20:21:27 GMT
but those on the slow lines are much closer to and are located within greater london,adding to long journey times is unnecessary as has been mentioned these stations are quite during the off peak travel times.
with the recent decision to operate the chesham shuttle even just temporarily this demonstrates the a stocks continued usefulness in its namesake areas'. remarkably a fifty five year old design outperforming its "modern day" successor for purpose and flexibility.
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 8, 2011 20:34:14 GMT
I must say I do think it is a real shame that this new timetable change is adding around 7 minutes onto the journey time into Baker St. I have watched this thread grow and seen all sides of the story including the one put forward by metcontrol - I can see that its quite obvious some passengers campaigned for a better service in the Pinner area but surely anyone that looks at a railway line and sees journey times increasing sees this as a backwards step? As much as I love using the line (especially as it's miles better value for money than the Chiltern Line) and more interesting - I feel sorry for the communters who will have hours added to the journey each week on top of the already quite long journey time from Amersham/Chesham. As a passenger, in my mind, in this day and age services should be getting quicker - not 7 minutes slower. Interestingly, having checked Journey Planner, it will take 77 minutes on Sunday for a train from Chesham to get to Aldgate. If you made the same journey using the current off-peak timetable and changed at Finchley Rd or Baker St for an Aldgate train from Uxbridge (and not change to the C&H at Baker St), the journey time is 77 minutes. Currently, an AM peak train doing the same journey fast is 72 minutes. Add a Wembley Park stop in for December's new AM peak schedules, I guess the journey time will be 74/75 minutes?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2011 20:42:27 GMT
I must say I do think it is a real shame that this new timetable change is adding around 7 minutes onto the journey time into Baker St. I have watched this thread grow and seen all sides of the story including the one put forward by metcontrol - I can see that its quite obvious some passengers campaigned for a better service in the Pinner area but surely anyone that looks at a railway line and sees journey times increasing sees this as a backwards step? As much as I love using the line (especially as it's miles better value for money than the Chiltern Line) and more interesting - I feel sorry for the communters who will have hours added to the journey each week on top of the already quite long journey time from Amersham/Chesham. As a passenger, in my mind, in this day and age services should be getting quicker - not 7 minutes slower. Interestingly, having checked Journey Planner, it will take 77 minutes on Sunday for a train from Chesham to get to Aldgate. If you made the same journey using the current off-peak timetable and changed at Finchley Rd or Baker St for an Aldgate train from Uxbridge (and not change to the C&H at Baker St), the journey time is 77 minutes. Currently, an AM peak train doing the same journey fast is 72 minutes. Add a Wembley Park stop in for December's new AM peak schedules, I guess the journey time will be 74/75 minutes? SB morning Amersham and Chesham fast peaks, as per today, don't stop at Wembley Pk come Dec, so should imagine it will be very similar to today journey time wise, unless they are regulated anywhere else?
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 8, 2011 20:49:54 GMT
but those on the slow lines are much closer to and are located within greater london,adding to long journey times is unnecessary as has been mentioned these stations are quite during the off peak travel times. The 'poor' off-peak passengers at the northern end of the Met line will still have 4 tph to Amersham (2 Chiltern and 2 Met) and 2 tph to Chesham and at a bargain fare compare to other rail services. As the Chiltern services will remain fast, quick journey times to Central London will still be possible. Compare that to most mainline routes where you'll be lucky to have 2 tph off-peak. And in the future, with S-stock trains, the shuttles could run to/from Rickmansworth / Northwood or Watford saving the Chesham passengers an unnecessary extra change during engineering works.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2011 22:03:36 GMT
Interestingly, having checked Journey Planner, it will take 77 minutes on Sunday for a train from Chesham to get to Aldgate. If you made the same journey using the current off-peak timetable and changed at Finchley Rd or Baker St for an Aldgate train from Uxbridge (and not change to the C&H at Baker St), the journey time is 77 minutes. Currently, an AM peak train doing the same journey fast is 72 minutes. Add a Wembley Park stop in for December's new AM peak schedules, I guess the journey time will be 74/75 minutes? SB morning Amersham and Chesham fast peaks, as per today, don't stop at Wembley Pk come Dec, so should imagine it will be very similar to today journey time wise, unless they are regulated anywhere else? Ah yes mate but as a leisure traveller I wont benefit from the "fast" services at all as I will not be travelling in the AM/PM peak so for me I will be seeing a increase in journey times which I do think is a great shame. MC - I can see your point and agree with you that it does not make sense that you should send empty trains running back and forth into the capital BUT as someone also pointed out - the stations that the Fast services do miss out are not used as much as some of the outers - they are also closer to Central London therefore do not take as long to get into the centre of town unlike stations such as Amersham, Chesham, C&L, Chorleywood & Ricky. As I have said before, I honestly do believe that increasing journey times - whichever way you look at it is a step backwards. Surely any railway would aspire to run faster services? Indeed Tfl themselves are always very keen to publicise the planned journey time reductions on many lines once engineering works are complete - yet they are not so keen to publish the added journey times to a large amount of Met Line users. As I say I can see both sides of the story, but I do think it is a shame that although I get to travel on these new, airy and very bright trains I will need to make myself that little more comfy when on board as it will take me longer to reach my destination.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 8, 2011 22:36:20 GMT
SB morning Amersham and Chesham fast peaks, as per today, don't stop at Wembley Pk come Dec, so should imagine it will be very similar to today journey time wise, unless they are regulated anywhere else? Ah yes mate but as a leisure traveller I wont benefit from the "fast" services at all as I will not be travelling in the AM/PM peak so for me I will be seeing a increase in journey times which I do think is a great shame. MC - I can see your point and agree with you that it does not make sense that you should send empty trains running back and forth into the capital BUT as someone also pointed out - the stations that the Fast services do miss out are not used as much as some of the outers - they are also closer to Central London therefore do not take as long to get into the centre of town unlike stations such as Amersham, Chesham, C&L, Chorleywood & Ricky. As I have said before, I honestly do believe that increasing journey times - whichever way you look at it is a step backwards. Surely any railway would aspire to run faster services? Indeed Tfl themselves are always very keen to publicise the planned journey time reductions on many lines once engineering works are complete - yet they are not so keen to publish the added journey times to a large amount of Met Line users. As I say I can see both sides of the story, but I do think it is a shame that although I get to travel on these new, airy and very bright trains I will need to make myself that little more comfy when on board as it will take me longer to reach my destination. It could all the a 'cunning plan'. First decelerate the service whilst there are A-stock still around; then, once the S stock has displaced all the A stock, trains can magically be accelerated (even with the extra stops). Finally, once the resignaling has been finished, the fasts can magically reappear as an improvement in journey times. A similar example is seen with Inter City services, especially on the East Coast, which still havn't recovered to timings seen in the 1980s. It wouldn't be the first time that a service has got worse before being improved by an upgrade.
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Sept 8, 2011 23:23:21 GMT
As I have said before, I honestly do believe that increasing journey times - whichever way you look at it is a step backwards. Surely any railway would aspire to run faster services? Indeed Tfl themselves are always very keen to publicise the planned journey time reductions on many lines once engineering works are complete - yet they are not so keen to publish the added journey times to a large amount of Met Line users. As I've stated on the Chiltern & Metropolitan Railway thread, TfL's official response to Network Rail's suggestion that journey times should be improved on the LUL section of the 'Aylesbury Corridor' is: "Whilst journey time improvements on this route are welcome, they should not come at the expense of service levels at stations in London." Doesn't inspire confidence in your average Chiltern/Met passenger in Bucks! In the same response, TfL state that it's recommended approach to improvements in journey time, capacity etc on the 'Aylesbury Corridor' are by timetable interventions instead. Maybe it was this current timetable intervention that TfL felt would lead to these improvements?
|
|