|
Post by redsetter on Sept 10, 2011 16:33:02 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2011 17:01:56 GMT
The problem is now that when Metronet replaced the Watford South junction in '07, they replaced the crossover rated at 40mph(?) for local Amershams with one I think only allows 20mph for local Amershams. Both Fast to Local crossovers at Watford South Junction are 25mph according to the signalling book wiring.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2011 17:02:11 GMT
The Met is lucky to get a fast service at all - you don't see anything skipping half the stations from Epping to West Ruislip (albeit a different scenario, some people might just have a commute from example Greenford to Newbury Park!)
It's part of the Underground, not National Rail. It may be a "degraded service" but not for those at the south end of the line, where the passenger loadings seem to be heavier in the off-peaks anyway!
Perhaps 2tph of the service Chalfont to Harrow should be diverted instead to Uxbridge to help with the markedly higher passenger loadings on that section of line off-peak... might appreciate the service you'll get then!
The top end of the Met isn't special. Use Chiltern if you want the speed in - the fares are the ruddy same!
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Sept 10, 2011 17:02:48 GMT
Adrian shooter was on television earlier in the week promoting the new 100mph 1 hour marylebone banbury service,its a disgrace that journey times are proposed to increase on the met line when the emphasis is on speed,amersham/chesham is to far for all station stops. It isn't fair to compare the Met to the Chiltern Main Line. The Met is an outer-surburban commuter line, whilst the Chiltern Main Line is now in my opinion an InterCity railway. Inevitably speeds will be higher on an IC line. mikeyr1234 I forgot to add to my last post that if you travel into London regularly you should get a Network Railcard, which would give you 1/3 off both Oyster and NR Off-peak fares. So a Off peak travelcard from Beaconsfield will be £12 instead of £18. Is this timetable a sort of trial for the major timetable change planned for December 2012? I know that Chiltern and LUL were in negotiations about the Dec 2012 timetable, to allow improved speeds and services to Aylesbury. Is the thinking that by diverting the Amersham/Chesham services onto the slow lines, you free up the fasts for Chiltern services? The problem is now that when Metronet replaced the Watford South junction in '07, they replaced the crossover rated at 40mph(?) for local Amershams with one I think only allows 20mph for local Amershams. I don't believe there is a 'major' timetable change planned for Dec 12. It is more likely to be similar to the Dec 11 timetable with a couple of running time revisions, but at the moment it doesn't look like these will be particularly significant That news will disappoint Chiltern and Network Rail. The West Midlands & Chilterns RUS published in May says that Chiltern Railways and LUL, have commenced consideration of what opportunities exist to exploit incremental service mix and journey time improvements following the introduction of the December 2012 timetableIf talks have broken down, it seems passengers on the 'Aylesbury Corridor' will have to settle for low speeds until at least resignalling comes in 2017(?). TfL have said that their preferred option for improving speeds etc is by timetabling changes and if that doesn't happen it would be very disappointing. Chiltern have pretty much been slagging off LUL publicly for what is coming up to 10 years now, and looks like they will continue to do so for several years to come. I can't blame them. When ATP was being rolled out on the Chiltern Lines during the BR days, LUL 'agreed' to allow it to be installed on the Met. However, LUL never arranged the possesions required, and the Chiltern management were forced to fit tripcocks on the 165s. When BR was privatised, this same BR Chiltern Lines management, won the franchise as Chiltern Railways, and has seen speeds on the Met drop to the lowest in 50 years, cancelling out the improvements they have funded north of Amersham. I remember when I opened my new Chiltern timetable to find out my commute to Aylesbury had increased by 5 minutes with the non-stop Harrow - Ricky time increasing from 7 minutes to 13 minutes! They had to retime my train so that when commuters arrived at Aylesbury, they had enough time to reach work on time. Chiltern and the passenger have been repeatedly been told that millions is being spent on the Met yet the non-stop Chiltern journey still takes 11 minutes. don't get this whole north Met attitude that they are some sort of special group deserving of bespoke services whats the mileage from Epping to Holborn as a comparison to Amersham - Baker St? bet theres not a lot in it and Epping passegners don't have fast trains in the peak, let alone the off peak! Epping to Holborn is 18 miles and 56 chains. Since most commuters in the Chiltern area go into the city, it would be fairer to compare the Amersham - Moorgate distance. This distance is 27 miles and 14 chains. Amersham - Baker St is 23 miles and 64 chains. The time it takes to travel between Epping and Holborn is about 47 minutes, the same as a Fast Amersham - Baker St. At least Epping has a 6 minute frequency to the city at morning peak, unlike Amersham or Chesham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2011 17:06:08 GMT
I remember when I opened my new Chiltern timetable to find out my commute to Aylesbury had increased by 5 minutes with the non-stop Harrow - Ricky time increasing from 7 minutes to 13 minutes! They had to retime my train so that when commuters arrived at Aylesbury, they had enough time to reach work on time. Chiltern and the passenger have been repeatedly been told that millions is being spent on the Met yet the non-stop Chiltern journey still takes 11 minutes. S stock should bring the line speed to ~60mph again with the new signals when in place. Bear in mind they have a design speed of 62mph, compared to the current 50mph limit of A stock. That and they should be able to absolutely thrash a 165 off the mark!
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Sept 10, 2011 17:53:04 GMT
S stock should bring the line speed to ~60mph again with the new signals when in place. Bear in mind they have a design speed of 62mph, compared to the current 50mph limit of A stock. That and they should be able to absolutely thrash a 165 off the mark! The speed limits are already 60mph on the fasts and north of Ricky for Chiltern! It is not much of an improvement if it stays at 60mph! 40+ years ago the locals were 60mph, and the fasts 70mph, with the section between Ricky and Chalfont rated 60mph, and Chalfont to Missenden at 70mph. In those days, the Great Central services ran faster than these speeds as the locos didn't have speedos. The S Stock top speed is 62mph but the A Stock was designed for 70mph! Sure the S stock will be faster than the A Stock has been in the past 10 years, but will be slower than services 20, 30, 40 years ago. LUL will advertise this as an improvement when it is anything but!
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 10, 2011 18:08:10 GMT
@metcontrol Is this timetable a sort of trial for the major timetable change planned for December 2012? I know that Chiltern and LUL were in negotiations about the Dec 2012 timetable, to allow improved speeds and services to Aylesbury. Is the thinking that by diverting the Amersham/Chesham services onto the slow lines, you free up the fasts for Chiltern services? The problem is now that when Metronet replaced the Watford South junction in '07, they replaced the crossover rated at 40mph(?) for local Amershams with one I think only allows 20mph for local Amershams. Tomorrow's trial is for the December 2011 change. As shedcompnodosh has replied, December 2012 will more or less mirror the already introduced December 2011. Chiltern were not a major factor in bringing this timetable change. Chiltern only forwarded their completed service proposals / timetable for December 2011 after the date that the first draft of our new timetable was compete.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2011 18:13:33 GMT
Adrian shooter was on television earlier in the week promoting the new 100mph 1 hour marylebone banbury service,its a disgrace that journey times are proposed to increase on the met line when the emphasis is on speed,amersham/chesham is to far for all station stops. That news will disappoint Chiltern and Network Rail. The West Midlands & Chilterns RUS published in May says that Chiltern Railways and LUL, have commenced consideration of what opportunities exist to exploit incremental service mix and journey time improvements following the introduction of the December 2012 timetableI don't doubt there will be an improvement to journey times on the Met for Dec 12, but I don't think this will be to any earth shattering degree, maybe something like a minute or so saved between Harrow and Amersham? Also bear in mind there are still only 9 'S' stocks in service and these are likely to be driven fairly conservatively as T/OP's familiarise themselves with their new kit This means no data of any real value will be available for the Dec 12 timetable, so any time savings brought about by 'S' stock are unlikely to be seen until May or Dec 13
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 10, 2011 21:05:02 GMT
The problem is now that when Metronet replaced the Watford South junction in '07, they replaced the crossover rated at 40mph(?) for local Amershams with one I think only allows 20mph for local Amershams. Both Fast to Local crossovers at Watford South Junction are 25mph according to the signalling book wiring. There seems to be something wrong with the nested quoting since the last update of the forums, but I didn't write that, Metrailway did.
|
|
|
Post by A60stock on Sept 10, 2011 23:17:21 GMT
so when this new timetable in dec 11 comes into place, are the amershams running all stations to harrow and then non stopping to wembley? if i am wrong could someone please present the off peak pattern for me?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2011 23:18:16 GMT
It's not just Chesham and Amersham passengers, think of those travelling, for example, from Moor Park to Wembley Park. No Chiltern service so they are forced to travel on a train service which takes 7 minutes longer and doesn't benefit them in the slightest.
I, for one, travel daily from Chesham to Wembley Park and am not looking forward to the possibility of arriving late at work and having to get the earlier train from Chesham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 8:27:18 GMT
As far as I understand it, the changes are really only to the off-peak service. And from what I've used on the Met, mostly off-peak, the trains carry almost entirely fresh air. It makes no sense to run a fast service for a few people? It's 7 or so minutes more on the journey time. Not a huge amount, given the distance. It also increases flexibility for people on the slow line stations, or wanting to get there. Nothing's ever win-win but I support this idea. I don't get why it's "such an outrage" and "commuters will use the Met less" as it doesn't ruddy affect the peak-time services! Epping passegners don't have fast trains in the peak, let alone the off peak! Probably because the Central doesn't have a dedicated fast line! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 8:30:16 GMT
That news will disappoint Chiltern and Network Rail. The West Midlands & Chilterns RUS published in May says that Chiltern Railways and LUL, have commenced consideration of what opportunities exist to exploit incremental service mix and journey time improvements following the introduction of the December 2012 timetableAlso bear in mind there are still only 9 'S' stocks in service and these are likely to be driven fairly conservatively as T/OP's familiarise themselves with their new kit Funny, I'm sure I had 10 running the other day and any I have been on, whether in cab or passenger saloon, there hasn't been any "conservative" driving!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 8:32:21 GMT
It's not just Chesham and Amersham passengers, think of those travelling, for example, from Moor Park to Wembley Park. No Chiltern service so they are forced to travel on a train service which takes 7 minutes longer and doesn't benefit them in the slightest. I, for one, travel daily from Chesham to Wembley Park and am not looking forward to the possibility of arriving late at work and having to get the earlier train from Chesham. Those of us in Watford have been degraded to a 15 minute service so the Pinner lot can get their 7.5 minute service!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 10:16:55 GMT
Also bear in mind there are still only 9 'S' stocks in service and these are likely to be driven fairly conservatively as T/OP's familiarise themselves with their new kit Funny, I'm sure I had 10 running the other day and any I have been on, whether in cab or passenger saloon, there hasn't been any "conservative" driving! doesn't matter whether it's 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 trains, you could have 20 running and it still wouldn't be overly heplful - the data isn't going to be reliable yet with such a small sample of trains and T/OP's driving 'S' stock on a ratio of 1 in 4 or 5 duties (on average) a number of colleagues who have been out and about on 'S' stock have reported cautious approach work to platform stops inparticular, which would distort run time data greater than anything else
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 11, 2011 10:24:06 GMT
Funny, I'm sure I had 10 running the other day and any I have been on, whether in cab or passenger saloon, there hasn't been any "conservative" driving! There are 9 booked stocks (1 used twice) and the occasional extra one when Train Operator availability allows. As you are aware, there are still Train Operators who are getting fully to grips with the new stock and as such, may drive in a slightly different manner than if they were in an A-stock.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Sept 11, 2011 14:46:08 GMT
The Chesham branch is never going to work well with the present track layout and through service. As soon as there is a service interruption and the train is running late there are problems as has been well covered on this Forum in the past. Is the S stock fitted with selective door opening as this could be a possible answer? When there are problems run a train into the bay at Chalfont and Latimer and lock our the rear 4 coach doors - surely one of the advantages of a full width link between the coaches? If things stay as they are they are IMO the Chesham Branch will be viewed as a liability and the axe will be sharpened - We have all heard the denials of the occurring - been there done that in the past. Xerces Fobe this is a worrying point that's been raised
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Sept 11, 2011 17:17:14 GMT
The Chesham branch is never going to work well with the present track layout and through service. As soon as there is a service interruption and the train is running late there are problems as has been well covered on this Forum in the past. Is the S stock fitted with selective door opening as this could be a possible answer? When there are problems run a train into the bay at Chalfont and Latimer and lock our the rear 4 coach doors - surely one of the advantages of a full width link between the coaches? If things stay as they are they are IMO the Chesham Branch will be viewed as a liability and the axe will be sharpened - We have all heard the denials of the occurring - been there done that in the past. Xerces Fobe this is a worrying point that's been raised I know it's another denial, but put it this way: The discussions for 2013s timetables are in full swing, and the plans do include the Chesham service. So until then at least, the Chesham branch remains very much open for business
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 11, 2011 18:39:21 GMT
this is a worrying point that's been raised I know it's another denial, but put it this way: The discussions for 2013s timetables are in full swing, and the plans do include the Chesham service. So until then at least, the Chesham branch remains very much open for business And as was said by someone back in May, when the 'worrying' quoted text was from, the resignalling of the line will mitigate problems with the Chesham branch by providing a place west of Chalfont where a Chesham bound train can wait without blocking any Amersham service behind it.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 11, 2011 18:45:35 GMT
The problem is now that when Metronet replaced the Watford South junction in '07, they replaced the crossover rated at 40mph(?) for local Amershams with one I think only allows 20mph for local Amershams. Both Fast to Local crossovers at Watford South Junction are 25mph according to the signalling book wiring. Having been past today, at both Watford North and Watford South Junctions, the mainline speed is now 50mph (no longer 60). The Watford North curve is 20mph and the Fast - Local at Watford South is 25mph, as you said. So the current penalty in crossing over is probably not much different to the old layout at the here.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Sept 11, 2011 18:50:01 GMT
Wasn't the replacement to enable Watford services to run faster over this section?
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Sept 11, 2011 18:51:48 GMT
Wasn't the replacement to enable Watford services to run faster over this section? Yep, Watford speeds increased from 20 to 30mph after the replacement Having been past today, at both Watford North and Watford South Junctions, the mainline speed is now 50mph (no longer 60). The Watford North curve is 20mph and the Fast - Local at Watford South is 25mph, as you said. So the current penalty in crossing over is probably not much different to the old layout at the here. The SB fast become 60mph after Moor Park. IIRC the NB fast becomes 50mph from 60mph just south of the bridge over the Grand Union Canal/ River Colne
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 11, 2011 19:04:39 GMT
Having been past today, at both Watford North and Watford South Junctions, the mainline speed is now 50mph (no longer 60). The Watford North curve is 20mph and the Fast - Local at Watford South is 25mph, as you said. So the current penalty in crossing over is probably not much different to the old layout at the here. The SB fast become 60mph after Moor Park Yes, but people where complaining about the fast - local Watford South Junction speed being cut. As the speed on the fast is only 50mph here, the drop in speed for the local line connection isn't so bad as it might be, as the limit over both routes over the junction has been reduced. I suppose one question would be is the new layout designed for higher speeds, but has lower limits for maintenance reasons. If so, will it be possible to increase speeds once S-stock has taken over all trains? As the A stock is only allowed to 50 mph, the 60 mph on the SB fast won't be used by Met trains, only potentially by the Chiltern trains.
|
|
|
Post by cooperman on Sept 11, 2011 19:58:25 GMT
The Met is lucky to get a fast service at all - you don't see anything skipping half the stations from Epping to West Ruislip (albeit a different scenario, some people might just have a commute from example Greenford to Newbury Park!) It's part of the Underground, not National Rail. It may be a "degraded service" but not for those at the south end of the line, where the passenger loadings seem to be heavier in the off-peaks anyway! Perhaps 2tph of the service Chalfont to Harrow should be diverted instead to Uxbridge to help with the markedly higher passenger loadings on that section of line off-peak... might appreciate the service you'll get then! The top end of the Met isn't special. Use Chiltern if you want the speed in - the fares are the ruddy same! As a passenger on the " Top end of the Met " i can tell you a lot of people moved out to Amersham and Chesham based on the fact there was a Fast service into London. So lucky no. Maybe you should take the time to go down to Harrow , Hmmm lets say about 1800 Peak time N/B. Lets see how far you get , while you see endless Uxbridge and in the case of Watford empty trains Depart N/B. ETA : Don't get me wrong . I'm Very pleased we have a service from Chesham, but please please TFL don't keep telling us " We are improving the Met to give you a Faster Service " . It just winds up your Client Base. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 20:27:53 GMT
The Met is lucky to get a fast service at all - you don't see anything skipping half the stations from Epping to West Ruislip (albeit a different scenario, some people might just have a commute from example Greenford to Newbury Park!) It's part of the Underground, not National Rail. It may be a "degraded service" but not for those at the south end of the line, where the passenger loadings seem to be heavier in the off-peaks anyway! Perhaps 2tph of the service Chalfont to Harrow should be diverted instead to Uxbridge to help with the markedly higher passenger loadings on that section of line off-peak... might appreciate the service you'll get then! The top end of the Met isn't special. Use Chiltern if you want the speed in - the fares are the ruddy same! As a passenger on the " Top end of the Met " i can tell you a lot of people moved out to Amersham and Chesham based on the fact there was a Fast service into London. So lucky no. Do all these people who moved to Amersham and Chesham start work in London after 10.00 ? Nice work if you can get it !!!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 11, 2011 20:37:41 GMT
So by that merit the Piccadilly Line should call at Ravenscourt Park, Stamford Brook, Turnham Green and Chiswick Park?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 20:41:37 GMT
So by that merit the Piccadilly Line should call at Ravenscourt Park, Stamford Brook, Turnham Green and Chiswick Park? No, because it would cost an absolute fortune to re-align the tracks and build platforms at Chiswick Park and Stamford Brook in one direction The economy isn't too hot at the moment if you hadn't noticed!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 20:51:00 GMT
So by that merit the Piccadilly Line should call at Ravenscourt Park, Stamford Brook, Turnham Green and Chiswick Park? The District Line (for the first three at least) provides a decent service as it is. It's quite a different scenario - not least to mention there isn't really the capacity to thrust the Piccadilly Line's full service down that way as well! Cooperman, you seem to have get again jumped my point. The top end of the Met is no more special than anywhere else on the line. Whining because you have a whole seven minutes slapped on your journey time to benefit people other than you? I might be coming across a bit grouchy but the whole attitude from the people in zones 8/9 seems to be sod everyone else, I want my fast trains! The changes are off-peak, like I also said in my post. They are improving peak journey times and capacity with the S stock, not that you'll see all of that until the resignalling is complete and in full service. Like I said before, there's a lot of fresh air carried on the Met in the off-peak. If you're in a rush to get somewhere, use Chiltern. Marylebone is a short couple of minutes walk away from Baker Street.
|
|
|
Post by cooperman on Sept 11, 2011 20:58:00 GMT
As a passenger on the " Top end of the Met " i can tell you a lot of people moved out to Amersham and Chesham based on the fact there was a Fast service into London. So lucky no. Do all these people who moved to Amersham and Chesham start work in London after 10.00 ? Nice work if you can get it !!! Your not getting the point. The services will effect the " Peak Service"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2011 21:06:33 GMT
Do all these people who moved to Amersham and Chesham start work in London after 10.00 ? Nice work if you can get it !!! Your not getting the point. The services will effect the " Peak Service" Put the point across then ... how will the changes to the Dec 11 off peak, affect the peak direction of travel?
|
|