Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 13:04:21 GMT
Hi guys,
Last month I was using the Underground a lot and was working around the Moorgate area. I do love the old posters left by the widen lines, really interesting! However, I was on a Met (slow) heading towards Moorgate, which I thought was unusual, but what I found more interesting, that platform 4 was being used by the Met??
How likely are the Met to terminate here and how rare is it for them to do so on platform 4, considering I thought it was out of use???
James
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 13:24:21 GMT
However, I was on a Met (slow) heading towards Moorgate, which I thought was unusual, but what I found more interesting, that platform 4 was being used by the Met?? How likely are the Met to terminate here and how rare is it for them to do so on platform 4, considering I thought it was out of use??? James platform 3 and 4 at Moorgate have never been out of use There are no booked timetabled moves for the Met, but they are used regularly enough on weekends when engineering works prevent normal access into Aldgate and the city They are also used on some Wembley Event return traffic TTN's There is I believe one booked timetable movement in platform 3, for a C&H (RR) stock transfer on the MF
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,419
|
Post by metman on Jan 3, 2011 13:25:02 GMT
Moorgate is normally only used by the Met when there are delays and trains need to be short worked to make up time (by missing out Liverpool Street and Aldgate).
Moorgate can also be used when engineering works are taking place and Aldgate is not accessable.
I'm not sure what the situation is now but Circle and Hammersmith & City trains regularly used platform 3 to reverse in when the service was being moved about and I presume this is still the case. Platform 3 is better being more accessable but I wasn't aware platform 4 was out of use?
I would guess that some trains will use platform 4 as a 'rusty rails' move.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 13:28:50 GMT
Ah I see! Well I know Platform 3 is used, but I thought 4 was taken out... Is there any chance that LUL will take over the widen lines platforms, or are these to be filled in?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 13:37:18 GMT
Ah I see! Well I know Platform 3 is used, but I thought 4 was taken out... The standard Met TTN when trains reverse at Moorgate necessitates the use of both platforms 3 and 4.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,419
|
Post by metman on Jan 3, 2011 13:43:56 GMT
LUL is looking into the use of the 'site' between Farringdon and Moorgate. I think this is more for stabling. Remember Farringdon sidings will be too short for S7 trains and replacements are needed.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Jan 3, 2011 14:52:15 GMT
I think the "site" between farringdon and moorgate would make an ideal maintainence depot (as in several locations on the Paris metro). It has plenty of lenght , is under cover of some sort for most of its area,and is accessible for most lines without too much difficulty.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 4, 2011 10:10:22 GMT
Both platforms 3 and 4 are used more or less on a daily basis - normally for service recovery. Once Whitechapel is lost as a reversing point, the number of train using Moorgate will unfortunately rise.
Platform 3 often gets favoured. There are a few reasons for this, but maybe the most obvious one from a customer point of view is that it puts westbound departures from either Platforms 2 or 3 on the same island platform.
There is just one booked move into Moorgate (platform 3). Train 245 visits Monday-Friday at 1621, departing 1644 westbound.
Until the recent timetable change, a train used to be stabled in platform 3 (weekends) or 4(M-F) overnight. Prior to that timetable, the bays had a booked reversing train late evening, which was a train en-route to Farringdon sidings (Hammersmith-Moorgate, then empty to Farringdon).
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Jan 7, 2011 22:25:44 GMT
LUL is looking into the use of the 'site' between Farringdon and Moorgate. I think this is more for stabling. Remember Farringdon sidings will be too short for S7 trains and replacements are needed. It is possible that the ex-Thameslink platforms would be an ideal site for that. I don't think 3 and 4 could be taken out otherwise the Met would have to be curtailed to Baker Street. The A Stock reversing at King's Cross would create a bottleneck.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Jan 8, 2011 5:24:44 GMT
Until the recent timetable change, a train used to be stabled in platform 3 (weekends) or 4(M-F) overnight. A or C stock?
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Jan 8, 2011 8:15:32 GMT
LUL is looking into the use of the 'site' between Farringdon and Moorgate. I think this is more for stabling. Remember Farringdon sidings will be too short for S7 trains and replacements are needed. When I began my LT career the widened lines between Moorgate and Kings Cross were LT signalled and controlled from LT cabins. In fact one of the very first jobs that I worked on circa 1977 was Farringdon, Barbican and Moorgate resignalling all done on a single Saturday night. Back then of course Liverpool Street platform 3 was regularly used for reversing trains and there was also the Barbican siding where a train was stabled overnight IIRC. Liverpool Street platform 3 is permanently closed but I see no reason why the Barbican siding could not be relaid if required, or several, if the widened lines were to be used once more by LU stock. I must admit to being somewhat puzzled though. I surveyed Liverpool Street, Moorgate, Barbican and Farringdon for the CrossRail project in 1995/6 and at that time Farringdon was expected to become a major rail hub within 15-20 years. I recall doing some additional survey work at Farringdon at the time as the Farringdon expansion was already apparently on the drawing board and would impact upon the sidings area and LU/BR boundary.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 8, 2011 11:28:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 9, 2011 19:11:07 GMT
Moorgate used to have a few booked Met reversers on the peak shoulders, more so in the days when the city service was peak hours only.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Jan 10, 2011 16:54:10 GMT
Moorgate used to have a few booked Met reversers on the peak shoulders, more so in the days when the city service was peak hours only. I remember in the 70s they were ex-Watford all stations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2011 9:54:21 GMT
@ railtechnician, from your surveys, is there potential to extend DLR from Bank to Farringdon using the old Widened Lines, terminating on the east side of the station?
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Jun 20, 2011 13:27:49 GMT
..in a similar vein railtechnician, don't suppose if your surveying showed if any consideration was given to demolishing the building on the site of Farringdon St. Station, and knocking through to the Smithfield sidings for Thameslink, leaving the widened lines platforms as-is.
(I still think something like that, coupled with knocking though platforms 3&4 at Moorgate would be really useful for being able to reorder units on the move, terminate from either direction without conflict, or run some services fast skipping Barbican)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2011 15:44:00 GMT
mrjrt, that's an interesting idea that I've had festering for years. This proposal would have allowed Thameslink services to split at Farringdon with separate platforms for Snow Hill (Blackfriars) and Barbican (Moorgate). They could have taken 12-car trains, and would have used the old GN goods depot from the north and the Smithfield sidings from the south. Historically these were separate, but between them they provided passage through to Snow Hill station, close to where City Thameslink now is. Here's an old plan which shows the network of tracks alongside Farringdon Rd (click for larger pic): And here's a diagram showing just the Smithfield Sidings from the south. For those interested, that website also has track/signal diagrams for Farringdon and Moorgate, and the lines south through Blackfriars. An office development now fills the space alongside Farringdon platforms, and the new Thameslink/Crossrail station is now being built on the corner block south of Cowcross St. But the rest of the old GN depot remains as car park, alongside the Smithfield Sidings. In theory you could still redevelop these as terminal platforms from the south, which would provide a more useful interchange than Blackfriars. Difficult to check but it appears that the platforms could open straight onto the new Thameslink ticket hall.
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Jun 20, 2011 22:24:24 GMT
That's a fantastic bit of imagery there - many thanks! Goes to show just how much has been lost over the years, doesn't it? I recall doing a spot of surveying-lite that interestingly showed that had the effort been put in when Holborn Viaduct was demolished (and City Thameslink built) that conceivably you could have got four tracks all the way from Blackfriars to Farringdon within the railway land, with just the pinch point of the old Snow Hill Station area to deal with. There's nowhere for them to go north from there mind you, but there's the easy(er) option of restoring the curve to Moorgate than new tunnels up to the GN (which would be the ideal option).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2011 9:30:44 GMT
I agree mrjrt, every development along that route has reduced future options, ironically including new cross-London rail projects, e.g. Crossrail at Farringdon, City Thameslink, the new Blackfriars station. Would four-tracking to Farringdon still be possible? You'd have to close City Thameslink and use the platform space, but I'm not sure about the box under the development just north of Blackfriars.
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Jun 21, 2011 20:23:23 GMT
I included the former land taken up by Holborn Viaduct's approaches and the station itself. You can see them here: (with the full details on the source page at Abandoned Stations
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2011 7:31:34 GMT
Nick Catford also has some good pics, of Snow Hill and Holborn Viaduct . The one below shows the box being constrcuted for City Thameslink. I'd like to know whether the box extends that wide all the way from the road at Holborn Viaduct south to the ramp up to Blackfriars?
|
|