|
Post by metrolander on Aug 11, 2010 20:03:28 GMT
Good evening everyone
I'm newly registered on here, having arrived in a quite roundabout fashion after something of a wikipedia tangent snowball! Despite not being a 'railway enthusiast' per se I have been intrigued by the technical information, knowledge, minutae etc etc one can glean from this site and I must say particularly with regards to the Met Line, as almost all of my life history involves living on that line...
ANYWAY without wanting to deviate massively from the more relevant and I've no doubt to many readers more interesting discussions regarding current operational matters etc, I thought I'd kick off my approved membership status with a thread, I'm sure it'll be obvious soon enough whether or not my choice of discussion topic is interesting to anyone!
Again, ANYWAY: Naturally one of the most regular points of recent discussion is the impending S stock, any discussion of which tends to lead to the discussion of A stock, often followed by passionate arguments for/against either!
Clearly, the forthcoming withdrawal of A stock is a sad issue for many, and from what I can tell for many of the varying backgrounds of posters on this site. I wonder if, rather than the various tangential back-and-forths regarding one vs the other, people might take the time to explain just what it is that means they will miss the A stock so much? I'm intrigued as to how apparent regular users, regular technicians, regular operators, regular line controllers, stock replacement project managers (excuse the inaccurate title), as well as enthusiasts young and old have so many different and strong thoughts about these trains in particular...
I will babble no further and see if any discussion develops, if so I might add my twopenneth further!
CHARS
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Aug 11, 2010 21:55:55 GMT
I'll miss looking out of the window viewing the lush greenery of metroland from the transverse seating, although I guess I could still do that with the turbos
|
|
|
Post by aldenham on Aug 11, 2010 22:02:26 GMT
I like most have a soft spot for A60/62s, as someone who grew up using the Northern Line I remember those stolen Saturday afternoons as a 12 year old, going to Baker St and catching a fast Amersham. Oh how exotic the high speed (sic) felt, though it was 1982 and I think they went a bit faster then, and how huge those big bouncy seats felt! Roll on 23 years or so and I was re-acquainted with them, after moving to Metroland, post refurbishment, I thought they looked quite smart still, certainly compared with Thameslink's 319s which I had previously used, and they seem to be the last link to the stock I loved as a kid, 38TS, 56/59TS, CO/CP etc. But we can't live in the past, they now feel tired and the difference in the ride on the same track with a Chiltern DMU is huge. So though A stock I will be sorry to see you go, it's time to move to a younger model!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Aug 11, 2010 23:57:43 GMT
I'll miss the opening windows and the properly sprung seats.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2010 2:16:43 GMT
The element of privacy those high backed seats give you. The luggage racks you can comfortably store your rucksack on. The rather powerful underseat heaters. The quiet rumble the doors make as they open and close. The complete lack of annoying automated PA announcements.
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Aug 12, 2010 6:08:00 GMT
The privacy, sound of the compressors (some I think, A60s I think). The fact they are the widest and do feel it...
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Aug 12, 2010 7:55:59 GMT
I honestly have only being using the Met in the last few weeks or so, but I've already fallen in love. I'll miss everything - the quiet sound of the doors opening and closing, the speeding up, the speeding down, the width of the trains, the seats and indeed the privacy.
|
|
|
Post by knap on Aug 12, 2010 10:38:28 GMT
I think I will miss getting a seat, I don't want to have to stand for longer than I have to. I know the reasons why there are fewer seats and I am prepared to reserve my final judgment until I actual travel on them regularly.
I will enjoy using new trains, but think I may not like the more openness compared to the current A stock.
|
|
|
Post by greatcentral on Aug 12, 2010 14:45:31 GMT
I will enjoy the air conditioning in summer but not the lack of seats especially the transverse ones. Travelling at 60+ seated sideways makes me feel distinctly odd. I know there are some transverse seats on the stock for the Amersham service but I think in general quite a lot of London passengers from the deep countryside will choose the already overcrowded Chiltern.
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Aug 12, 2010 16:44:51 GMT
Interesting thoughts so far, as I perhaps slightly expected the majority of opinions are based on passenger experience and no small amount of nostalgia.
It's refreshing to see some open minds with regards to the S stock, I'm sure I can't be the only person who is nostalgic about A stock/will miss it, but is also looking forward to the S stock. As I touched on, travelling on the Met Line is intrinsically linked to much of my childhood memories, and would be even if there was no further interest on my part. But, having reacquainted myself a bit recently (largely out of curiosity having read alot on here; I haven't used the line regularly for some time and now for the first time ever I don't live in Metroland!), much of the 'aura' has gone I feel. I must admit, I can't quite relate to the 'Amersham man' experience - first and foremost I'm not a commuter - but I'm certainly familiar with say Rickmansworth - City on the Met and personally I can't imagine sitting longtidunally being SUCH an unpalatable prospect?? Of course, I doubt I've ever experienced it at the prospective speeds but I'm certainly not as 'anti' the idea as many. I may also be amongst few who like A stock, and don't hate Class 378s?? Seriously, I like the comfortable springiness of the A stock but they were certainly more appealing when I was a slouching yoof, as was the 'privacy' afforded by the enclosed seating! Nowadays it strikes me as almost a little out of place, and really I think if you sit with good posture on a class 378 seat, they're very supportive! Good for your back! Before I stray back ON topic I have to say I found the new ELL (vaguely A stock related see) a very pleasant passenger experience on my recent maiden sojourn. Really not bad seats! More to the point the 'uncommanded seat change' nature of A stock (particularly in their higher speed heyday) has been discussed heavily already...
I'll tell you a train which is uncomfortable, and that's a Chiltern Turbo! At their inception they seemed so very very new and upmarket compared to the needing-refurb A stock, and I know at that time particularly it was something of a myth, but the journey seemed faster too. However, I also travelled on one of these for the first time in a while recently and it's not the hardness of the seat that's uncomfortable, it's the shape. Ouch. They seemed a very appealing choice way back when but I think alot of Amersham/Chalfont etc men/women will be making a bad move getting on one of those just to sit facing forwards...
Characteristically I've babbled again but I realise that I've come across as harsh on A stock... I LOVE how wide they are! In terms of ambience as well as external appearance. Whilst trawling old posts, learning of car names such as 'The Ark', 'Valiant' etc (excuse inaccurate recollection) brought a smile; perfect names! Big, mighty wide beast trains making their way through the countryside in businesslike yet grandiose fashion, fast and bouncy. I remember how exciting at the time the refurbishment was (I had no clue until a red-fronted train turned up one day) and they were VERY fresh - but so much more imperious and I think a little menacing-looking in their silver pomp!
There is ONE trivial design detail which I like so much, I wish it had been carried over to the S8s as further distinction from S7s, but it's frankly an anorakish whim...
The sounds... Almost a seperate sub-topic!
Over
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2010 17:06:08 GMT
I will miss everything aswell, The big comfortabe seats, the smell of hanging brakes, the noise going over bullhead points the list goes on but mainly I have alot of nice memories travelling on the met on those trains. And also don't forget, John Betjeman used to travel on them aswell.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 12, 2010 18:00:14 GMT
Here we go.... I am Metroland born and bred. Lived all my life on the Met. All 29-30 years of it, and all the time with the A stock. It would be silly to say they're like family but.... They are a link to the past I guess, which I never had. They are fantastic trains. Well built, long lasting and could probably go on for a few more years given the same love they've always had. I love the seating, nice and sprung, the little arm rests opposite the door pockets that my body litterally has moulded itself into after all these years. I like the sounds they make. DC motors are now becoming rare, and I shall miss the hum of the LT114s winding up. The PCM equipment is wonderful, and the bit I shall miss the most is the pop of the line breakers! The gentle noise of the EP brake, and the low hiss of the Westinghouse brake will be removed from LU in a few years. The Compressors, be they Westinghouse or Reavell sound great and I will certainly miss them. I also like the opening windows, and the guard's grab handle at the trailing end that I use to haul myself onto the train. The cabs are great. Simple, popular with the drivers and having a separate brake is nice. So I will miss them quite a lot, even the little coat of arms on the cab ends! The day the last one is withdrawn, will litterally be one of the worst day's of my life. I've always seen the A stock as the last link to the old Met Rly with their end, the Met will finally be lost. I'm just enjoying every second with them. I like the talk of preservation. If every A60 is cut up or none are kept working I don't know what I'd do......
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Aug 12, 2010 18:41:01 GMT
I will miss the distinct seat moquettes on the original stock. To me it seemed that the A62 moquette was not as soft as the original moquette on the A60.
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Aug 12, 2010 20:02:12 GMT
Nice Metman, I had certainly detected your general feelings in various previous posts! I have always been intrigued by (often slightly bizarre!) sounds of the A stock. I know them well enough to the point I can verbally impersonate some! They are the sorts of noises that draw reaction from people who generally couldn't care less... I am aware that A60s and A62s can be easily distinguished by their different sounds, I must admit I'm not sure which is which??
But anyway, loving the nostalgia. Ruislip, as it goes, your name is one of my previous Metroland outposts, as indeed was Ruislip Manor at a later date... And Metman, it's one of those random things based on personal experience, but the 'iron bridge' (as I call it, it's probably got a more accurate description) between Northwood and Northwood Hills is one of the most iconic spots on the Met line for me. It's such a minor thing but it's like a landmark to me!
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Aug 12, 2010 20:10:43 GMT
I daren't answer the OP, metman will tip my drink on the floor at the next forum meet ;D
73ts FTW
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 12, 2010 20:28:04 GMT
I've always called it the Iron Bridge too, but it does have a number!
It always lifts me to see an A stock train crossing it. I saw an S stock crossing the bridge at North Harrow last month and honestly, my heart sank!
SE13, you're drink's safe!
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Aug 12, 2010 20:43:52 GMT
SE13, you're drink's safe! That's good then..... I've never been a fan of SSL stock, and my only real experience with A stock was on the ELL, though I did once use the Met from Watford to go to watch a match at Wembley (Beat ManUre in the Charity Shield that day) I've only really ever used tube lines, apart from skiving school on the Circle many a year ago, so I can really do a verdict, as my major usage (given that I lived in South London) was London Bridge to KX and KX to Arsenal. And at the wrath of all the SSL drivers here, I think SSL trains look ugly compared with DLL trains. Right, best run......
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 12, 2010 20:49:43 GMT
Oi, come back 'ere!!!
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Aug 12, 2010 20:53:43 GMT
A number of course, but the Iron Bridge it is. Chilterns always seem to cross there... TBH I wouldn't mind seeing an S stock somewhere! Or at least, somewhere other than sitting out of the way in the depot or rolling out of Wembley Park, this is all I have seen so far, and from a bad angle. With the nostalgia still in mind, I think it's intriguing to see something new amongst everything else that is so familiar.
SE13, I have to say with this exception I wouldn't disagree that much. And it's not even that I think As are 'pretty', more sort of rugged yet grand, and proportioned in a gentlemanly fashion. They do make Jubilee line trains look a bit puny even if the tables are turned nowadays in acceleration stakes! Pre-limit lowering I used to love overtaking 83 stock trains, nowadays the only thing that gets a Met past a 96 out of Wembley Park is the divergence!
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Aug 12, 2010 21:26:46 GMT
Everyone that knows me on here will know I'm not out to offend!
It's just that I prefer hurtling through London in tube lines rather than travelling on something that resembles NR out in the countryside. It's almost a standing joke here, especially with the head bosses on here!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 12, 2010 22:20:29 GMT
A number of course, but the Iron Bridge it is. Chilterns always seem to cross there... TBH I wouldn't mind seeing an S stock somewhere! Or at least, somewhere other than sitting out of the way in the depot or rolling out of Wembley Park, this is all I have seen so far, and from a bad angle. With the nostalgia still in mind, I think it's intriguing to see something new amongst everything else that is so familiar. SE13, I have to say with this exception I wouldn't disagree that much. And it's not even that I think As are 'pretty', more sort of rugged yet grand, and proportioned in a gentlemanly fashion. They do make Jubilee line trains look a bit puny even if the tables are turned nowadays in acceleration stakes! Pre-limit lowering I used to love overtaking 83 stock trains, nowadays the only thing that gets a Met past a 96 out of Wembley Park is the divergence! With the weak field flag down they can still shift and beat a 96ts! There was a great article written the Guardian the other year, you may like it...... www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/artblog/2007/oct/22/classicsofeverydaydesignno33
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Aug 12, 2010 22:30:45 GMT
Thanks, as it goes I saw it recently whilst trawling posts, was indeed a good read
I must admit I'm a little murky as to this 'weak field' thing, I know if I dug around I could get the actual gen on that... Forgive me for being a lazy green sort but a quick once-over per chance? Something to do with the current pickup I guess; my understanding of that is negligible to say the least. I gather it makes them go faster, and is it that yellow and black flag thing? I sound like someone who doesn't know what offside means talking about offside bejesus...
Last thing, care to try and verbally describe to me what the aural distinction is between the A60 and A62? Think I might know as it's one crazy noise I don't notice all the time, again forgive me for abusing my topic by asking beginner questions, it's just I expect you will be able to answer in seconds flat!
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Aug 12, 2010 22:53:35 GMT
It is indeed the yellow and black thing visible in the offside windscreen (when raised). With the flag switch raised initial acceleration is slower but the train will reach line speed (well, some of them ). With the flag switch down initial acceleration is noticeably quicker but the train won't manage much more than 40mph. The flag should be raised North of Finchley Road and lowered South thereof. metman, a '96 with several motors out, perhaps! ;D
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Aug 12, 2010 23:17:20 GMT
Thanks for that Met Driver, re the other things I must say 1) I have to agree with your informed view based on my own observations as a passenger when it comes to Met/Jub races (as I mentioned, things were definitely different once upon a time) and 2) I am slightly envious of your view, having only seen it out of the side other than on youtube! Guess it might not seem that way when it's 'work' and you've been to x and back x amount of times, but it really must be the pick of LUL
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2010 23:29:38 GMT
Not intending to further derail the topic, but is it possible to raise the weak field flag while moving (for instance by another T/Op in the cab)?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2010 12:10:17 GMT
It is indeed the yellow and black thing visible in the offside windscreen (when raised). With the flag switch raised initial acceleration is slower but the train will reach line speed (well, some of them ). With the flag switch down initial acceleration is noticeably quicker but the train won't manage much more than 40mph. The flag should be raised North of Finchley Road and lowered South thereof. metman, a '96 with several motors out, perhaps! ;D I did wonder what that was! Thanks for the explanation I've become fond of the A stock, but unlike some, I get annoyed with the sheer volume of noise the compressors make, and I'm not built for the bumpy ride, that's for sure! I am a bit worried about the fewer seats on the S stock, but hopefully the walk-through layout will mean commuters get a bit better at using the space.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Aug 13, 2010 12:31:01 GMT
I have memories of them both now and pre-refurbishment, when they used to cane it between Finchley Road and Wembley Park, and being bounced up and down on the seats! They also had a very distinctive, damp smell before refurbishment - I can still smell it to this day!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 13, 2010 19:48:41 GMT
The Westinghouse A60 compressor noise has a lower and slightly slower pitch to it than the Reavell A62 compressor which has a slightly higher and definately more frantic tempo to it!
I usually don't sit in the trailers due to the noise of the compressors. You can feel them vibrating in the motor cars when stationary! I also love the noise from the motor cars, so it's no contest.
|
|
|
Post by younglulnerd on Jan 12, 2011 18:07:28 GMT
Mmmm... I love seeing the A stocks when walking alongside the tracks to the O2 centre (on a path of course, I'm not an idiot) between West Hampstead and Finchley Road. I haven't seen a S stock yet sadly, but I don't think they'll be as good. What about A stock being used for fasts as fasts don't really need metro style seating. Then our beloved A stock will stay in service, until they conk out, which hopefully won't be for ages EDIT: Oh, and SE13, I'm with you with the 73ts, but it's 3rd to the 96ts and As, and fourth are the Ds, the refurbishment made them even better than they were before, with the really cool moquette. When one is older, I'll go to LTM / Acton and buy one of those stools. I'd get on of the Routemaster moquette too, the most recent one (before they left service, the blue, white and red one) Slightly off topic, but my future house would be awesome, along with my Fire/ i sign that were sold at the LTMF stand last time at Acton for £4 ;D I would have got an ELL one, but my Mum wouldn't let me, not enough room
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Jan 12, 2011 19:31:04 GMT
In my opinion, privacy because of no cameras. That's why I've started modelling them for a train sim.
|
|