Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2007 11:51:42 GMT
Anyone here guilty of taking the above on an excursion to Northfields last night?.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2007 12:49:11 GMT
I'm not so sure that posting the train number is a good idea - a train number and a time bracket is more than enough to identify the T/Op, who may not want the whole intarwebnet to know that he took a wrong stick, whether by accident or on purpose.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Mar 27, 2007 13:06:16 GMT
I have to say that I concur. That said, it's interesting as it must have used the WB Local. Was reversal via the depot or the siding? Then via EB Local or Fast? The last time that I covered the Local lines in a D Stock was on the "Metroliner" tour of 1979. I cannot recall ever using the District to/from Hounslow West probably as they were Peaks only, and we did not move to Hounslow West from Feltham until 1965.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2007 13:19:40 GMT
Apologies, thread title altered. It did indeed go down the local and reversed via the depot. It then returned about 45 mins later via the e/b fast.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Mar 27, 2007 14:55:08 GMT
That IS interesting! The bit about the retrurning via the Fast I mean, which makes sense so that the errant train could reverse in the east sidings to go back to Ealing again, or can you also crossover to the District east of Acton Town? It has been tooooo many years since I have studied the track layout.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2007 15:20:54 GMT
The reason why it used the e/b fast is because the e/b local is under a semipermanent engineering possession every day, all day, yet these possessions are never used.
You can only cross from the e/b local to the e/b fast east of Acton, using WL106 rte 2; if you want to cross from the e/b fast to the e/b local you have to use WL97 rte 1 west of Acton.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Mar 27, 2007 15:57:53 GMT
Back in '79 I think it was the Brake Block Test guys were using the eastbound fast from Northfields to Acton and Picc trains then used the local. I wonder when the last time the e/b local was used in regular passenger use and if it will ever be used again?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2007 16:05:54 GMT
It was last used in 2003; the Piccadilly Line DEV shows a 1973TS in the e/b local platform at Northfields; the 64,000GBP question is whether or not that train was actually in passenger service.
I think soultrain told me once that there is at least one early-morning or late-evening 'rusty rail' working which acts as a functional test for the e/b local and the scissors crossover west of the e/b island at Northfields.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2007 12:06:08 GMT
The last staff train of the night sometimes uses the local between NFDS and ACT. I drove it on my job training last year.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Mar 28, 2007 13:55:14 GMT
Thanks for that. Keeps the rails cleanish and keeps 'hands in'? I wonder if this needs modification now? Do we have Train Nos. please for the scheduled workings please? www.gmhistorian.btinternet.co.uk/psul.htm
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2007 16:55:35 GMT
T327 (M-F), T335 (Sat) @0125 and T373 (Sun 0010) go down the E/B Local. Also T371 is the one that uses No.75 crossover at Acton. This is also the first train that goes direct to Heathrow from Hatton X at 0011.
DOC
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Mar 28, 2007 17:48:53 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2007 13:28:13 GMT
Also train 316 @ 2122 (M-F) uses the local between NFDS and ACT. This is a passenger train whereas those mentioned above are empty.
|
|
|
Post by ongarparknride on Mar 31, 2007 0:22:24 GMT
Gee, folks, anyone familiar with the track layout and signalling can understand what you are saying - the rest of us here gather a wrong stick was accepted or similar, and I guess there is a precedent for such a similar error already well recorded here :-) Personally, my interest in clicking on this is over the former "mercury tubes" prevention protecting sub-surface stock from accidentally entering routes entering tube stock tunnels. From other threads here I dare not refer to (at risk of being suspended again for a month or worst) as they have been dormant for at four weeks, I understand the protection I refer too is now conductive paint as Mercury is presumably a H&S hazard. It brings up interesting points over the historical development of the LU signalling etc.... with the differing protection of overhead tubes to detect over-tube gauge stock in the Kensington area that could dent the Piccadilly tunnels, and the BR gauge stock in the Leyton area that relied on the Leyton Signal Box "electric detection" to clear the points for the Central Line New Works extension towards Stratford. A further point arising above is the mention of "rusty-rail" working. In my recollections of lurking on most posts on this entire Forum, I don't immediately recollect any questions re: "zig-zag"s that certainly in the 1960's, 1970's existed on trackwork that was occasionally used, to provide a "better" track circuit activation on "rusty rails". As far as I recollect, these were quite common on LU trackwork, and especially I seem to recollect them on the sub-surface lines as well as the open-section tube tracks. Well, to avoid accusation of going off-thread, I guess I'd better refer to the OP over accepting a wrong stick. That (for the benefit of the Moderators) neatly ties in with my comments over signalling protection dating back at least some 50 years over covering out-of-gauge stock being signalled onto to potentially dangerous tracks. Drivers or Train Operators or whatever you are called these days, are - if I am correct - trained to obey signals. Red, you stop. Green (OK, quoting the Highway Code) you proceed if in your opinion as Driver and Responsible for your Train it appears safe to do so. So rather than as suggested in the first couple of posts here on this thread, a certain train driver might be subject to "ribbing" for taking a wrong stick, I am intrigued why no one questions why the oversight of setting the signals to permit an improper train to proceed along the selected route SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PROTECTED BY THE SIGNALLING SYSTEM --- AND NOT JUST THE SIGNALMAN Any comments anyone ? :-) OngarParkNRide
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Mar 31, 2007 3:53:36 GMT
Personally, my interest in clicking on this is over the former "mercury tubes" prevention protecting sub-surface stock from accidentally entering routes entering tube stock tunnels. From other threads here I dare not refer to (at risk of being suspended again for a month or worst) as they have been dormant for at four weeks, I understand the protection I refer too is now conductive paint as Mercury is presumably a H&S hazard. **Admin hat on**First of all, your suspension was never made public knowledge - but seeing as you have raised it; the reason for your suspension is, as far as the staff of this forum are concerned, a private matter and had sod all to do with reviving old threads................so your comments do puzzle me somewhat. Can I just clarify that old threads can be added to providing you have something of value to add or wish to add an updated correction. Linking to a previous thread for reference occurs as a matter of course on this forum - so again, I'm left puzzled by your comments. **Admin hat off** Anyway, yes, you are correct - mercury is no longer used in "out of gauge" tubes...........a special conductive silver paint is used instead. These can also be found on the Jubilee (to prevent Met's entering their tunnel) and on the Picc in the Houslow area (I think) as well as at Barons Court. A further point arising above is the mention of "rusty-rail" working. In my recollections of lurking on most posts on this entire Forum, I don't immediately recollect any questions re: "zig-zag"s that certainly in the 1960's, 1970's existed on trackwork that was occasionally used, to provide a "better" track circuit activation on "rusty rails". As far as I recollect, these were quite common on LU trackwork, and especially I seem to recollect them on the sub-surface lines as well as the open-section tube tracks. And still are!! There are many, many areas where a welded "zig zag" is used on the rail head to assist the track circuits. You can it too as it will make the train vibrate as it passes over. Well, to avoid accusation of going off-thread, I guess I'd better refer to the OP over accepting a wrong stick. That (for the benefit of the Moderators) neatly ties in with my comments over signalling protection dating back at least some 50 years over covering out-of-gauge stock being signalled onto to potentially dangerous tracks. **Admin hat on**Hmmm, nope, I'm not even going to bother commenting on this bit actually. **Admin hat off** Drivers or Train Operators or whatever you are called these days, are - if I am correct - trained to obey signals. Well yes, of course we are!! Red, you stop. Green (OK, quoting the Highway Code) you proceed if in your opinion as Driver and Responsible for your Train it appears safe to do so. Not quite, Green means: (on LUL) Proceed at line speed, the next section is clear. (on Network Rail, in MAS areas) Proceed at line speed, at least two sections ahead are clear. So rather than as suggested in the first couple of posts here on this thread, a certain train driver might be subject to "ribbing" for taking a wrong stick, I am intrigued why no one questions why the oversight of setting the signals to permit an improper train to proceed along the selected route SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PROTECTED BY THE SIGNALLING SYSTEM --- AND NOT JUST THE SIGNALMAN Any comments anyone ? :-) OngarParkNRide The reason for using the tubes is as you suggest, to prevent out of gauge stock going where it won't fit - but this would be plain daft at somewhere like South or North Ealing. Whilst a D stock in passenger service is not meant to go in those directions, empty stock moves are!! A stocks normally get to Ealing Common depot (for the test track, for example) by coming down from Rayners Lane via North Ealing. I suppose another way to put it is that the signalling system is there to provide a failsafe system of moving trains around - a train taking a wrong route on a section of track where it isn't out of gauge isn't a safety issue that needs fail safe protection.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2007 20:05:18 GMT
From the Piccadilly DEV a SSL train can in theory reach Hounslow West, as the tubes are after the said station heading towards Heathrow. Train Ops are Humans as well and all humans are subject making mistakes it happens. From my understanding however the train nor it's occupants were under any danger as they were no where near a 'tube' tunnel.
The train simply took the scenic Route, and the poor T/Op will have a lovely tale to regale his staff canteen about.
Cheers, ~ Matloughe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2007 20:09:51 GMT
Actually, that's no longer the case. Oracle says that two bridges west of Hounslow East have been refurbished with new spans that are incapable of taking the weight of surface stock.
It makes you wonder how they do track replacement work west of Hounslow East.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Apr 11, 2007 21:28:57 GMT
Yes, Tubeprune can probably tell you more than I can but there were two iron or steel bridges that were to sub-surface gauge over Kingsley Road (Hounslow Town/Hounslow East) and Lampton Road (Heston-Hounlsow/Hounslow Central). You can see the original Lampton Road bridge here I believe: photos.ltmcollection.org/images/max/42/9863742.jpgThe bridges were replaced so far as I know in an economical manner: photos.ltmcollection.org/images/max/8b/i000018b.jpgYou can just about see part of the Kingsley Road bridge...trains used to "roar" across, and they were quote noisy! photos.ltmcollection.org/images/max/59/9854559.jpgBecause presumably there was never going to be any SS stock using the branch as far as Hounslow Central, with the Heathrow loink being to tube gauge, the bridges were constructed to tube gauge as well and slid into position. SS stock is thus banned I gather west of Northfields though in theory could surely run to west of Boston Manor then shunt back into Northfields Depot? The last SS train that I know of was the D Stock Metroliner tour of 21st September 1980: mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/LUArchive/html/d78_metroliner_tour_1.htmlat Northfields 'local' EB, courtesy Solidbond. However in 1971 the Q Stock farewll tour reached Hounslow West, Platform 2 I think. I cannot for the life of me understand why the silver-paint tubes are still west of Central as SS stock would never have got as far as there! Thinking about it now, I am sure that the Hounslow West tunnel ceilings which were cast for WC French (main contractors) are to tube gauge only as well.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 12, 2007 12:09:26 GMT
Actually, that's no longer the case. Oracle says that two bridges west of Hounslow East have been refurbished with new spans that are incapable of taking the weight of surface stock. It makes you wonder how they do track replacement work west of Hounslow East. The '73 Stock is 2t heavier than D Stock! Of course, a battery loco weighs about 60t, twice the weight of a passenger car so logic would suggest that all LU track/bridges should take a 16t axle load.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Apr 12, 2007 12:26:39 GMT
Yes it's not the weight, per se, but the fact that they are narrower. So why in heck is there no SS train detector at Boston Manor west end or in the diveunder adjacent to Northfields depot WB or just after thereto?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 12, 2007 15:18:40 GMT
Yes it's not the weight, per se, but the fact that they are narrower. Ah, Yes, of course. The permitted routes for passenger stock state that surface stock is allowed as far as and into Northfields Depot but not beyond.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Apr 12, 2007 16:47:31 GMT
TP did you ever get to drive down our way?
Apart from the A Stock and Sarah (L12) on brake block tests, Northfields also hosted both CO/CP Stock and R Stock on sand drag tests, late Seventies I think. They used to plonk them out of the way where the 1960 Stock TRC and the two 1973 Stock test trains were also parked, namely the rsiding adjacent to the access road into the depot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2007 15:08:07 GMT
From the Piccadilly DEV a SSL train can in theory reach Hounslow West, as the tubes are after the said station heading towards Heathrow. A SS train will not be able to get to Hounslow West. After the starter at Hounslow Central WB the tubes are located around the bend towards Hounslow West. There is an 'X' signal located next to the bridge after it which if the tubes are broken will not clear. (The 'X' signal on the approach to Barons Court EB will return to danger if the tubes in that location are broken). Also at the entrance to Hounslow West there are about 3 or 4 large concrete blocks placed over the tracks at just above tube stock height so any SS train will be slowed down by hitting these. DOC
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2007 17:39:41 GMT
Also at the entrance to Hounslow West there are about 3 or 4 large concrete blocks placed over the tracks at just above tube stock height so any SS train will be slowed down by hitting these.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Apr 13, 2007 18:42:09 GMT
The SS train would have come to a grinding (pun intended) halt at Hounslow East, surely, and then written off the Kingsley Road bridge if not written off itself?!
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 24, 2007 9:24:04 GMT
23rd April 2007: T 65 16:26 ex ACT WB arr Northfields 16:45. OK 'fess up. Who's bashed the Picc again? Or was it some old DR man ensuring continuation of running powers over the old line?
|
|