Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2006 21:21:11 GMT
So how well did Connect do during its second trial-by-fire, given its increased usage scope?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 12, 2006 2:43:26 GMT
The line controllers seemed to buckle under the sheer amount of "call requests" they were receiving - resulting in at least two missed 'pass alarm' calls that I know of. Once again, the fact that the line controllers can call individual trains left most of us quite literally in the dark when it came to deciphering exactly what was going on (with the old "legacy" system it was possible to gauge information from the general radio traffic). And twice on my first half I tried to confirm if my Dagenham train was turning at Barking as per the platform DMI's - in the end I found out the answer the old fashioned way on arrival at Barking, when the shunt signal propmtly cleared for the sidings I've said it before and I'll say it again: has Connect improved communications as promised? Nope, not in the slightest! If anything, it's made things worse
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2006 9:12:13 GMT
Hmmmmm. It seems to me that the Line Controllers are in need of some retraining, then.
I wonder how well Connect will perform this morning, given that HSK appears to have fallen over again...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2006 13:42:25 GMT
Once again, the fact that the line controllers can call individual trains left most of us quite literally in the dark when it came to deciphering exactly what was going on (with the old "legacy" system it was possible to gauge information from the general radio traffic). What would you prefer/suggest? Having the LC's do a general broadcast in the event of anything bigger than a minor disruption? That would be a rather simple and quick solution I suppose...
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 12, 2006 14:03:43 GMT
Exactly! Even with the old system we never got much in the way of general broadcasts telling us about problems - but at least we had a fighting chance of 'reading between the lines' based on what the line controller was saying to other trains. The situation now is that we can still do this if the line controller continues to call trains using the group call facility - if they don't, and call trains individually, the controller then ends up with more calls because the rest of us are now cut out of the loop. The line controllers really need to understand that if they make a few extra general broadcasts, it really will help them (and the drivers). An example: I do wish they'd stop saying "we're blocking back driver". I think that fact is a tad obvious, otherwise I wouldn't be asking why I'm reduced to crawling from stick to stick (signal). If they were to answer (again via a group call) that there is a queue of trains from point A to point B and the reason is because of xxxxxxxxxxx - well.......they would see a reduction in radio traffic instead of several drivers asking the same question. At the moment the system is getting too bogged down with more drivers asking the same questions, but in private one-to-one calls (initiated by the line controller) - this is leading to an extremely poor response when dealing with pass alarms. I just hope it doesn't lead to a driver getting assaulted because he/she was unable to get station staff assistance. Put simply, the line controllers need to change the way they use this new equipment, otherwise they will continue to increase their own workload and never gain any extra benefit from it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2006 14:14:34 GMT
I'm surprised that the drivers aren't calling each other up and passing the information laterally - surely there is time to do this safely whilst stuck at a red stick.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Dec 12, 2006 21:32:20 GMT
The problem being is that we dont know the unit number or the number of the driver of the train in front or even whos driving it come to that so we cant contact him/her.
Colin has hit the nail on the head as we've been saying from the outset. The controllers need to help us to help themselves by giving us broadcasts telling us what the hell is going on. Until they start changing their regime upstairs their workload will continue to rise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2006 22:31:13 GMT
The problem being is that we dont know the unit number or the number of the driver of the train in front or even whos driving it come to that so we cant contact him/her. Colin has hit the nail on the head as we've been saying from the outset. The controllers need to help us to help themselves by giving us broadcasts telling us what the hell is going on. Until they start changing their regime upstairs their workload will continue to rise. Hear hear. Easiest way to get hold of the controller is still to use the auto phone, if there's one available. I did that today when I was given the route to Richmond instead of Ealing at Turnham Green, and got an answer very quickly. Unfortunately the controller called me back a couple of minutes later (Connect private call) to say that as there was no signaller on that desk they could not take a release. So, we now have a new approach to wrong routes - don't change the signal, change the train's destination!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2006 23:06:00 GMT
Another bad indeed ! A thread titled "Wow we had a good day" might be more appropriate. Who actually is responsible for the rubbish running of the District Line and who takes on the spot mad decisions based on lights on boards and not real people trying to get home ? My evenings in London are ruined by coming home to Upminster on this modern (?) rapid light transit system. *!). Barking, Barking, Barking, Oooh Upminster is soooo far away, I'm going to stop and turn round at Dagenham East and go back to London. Shame and the next Upminster is 45 mins behind. Rubbish, my boy could run a trainset better. Pass it on to the fat controller. And it happens far too frequently for my liking.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2006 23:53:38 GMT
I was on the district today, was at turnham Green west, kept hearing the radio scratching away asking for train 71... Got to Chiswick Park, control still asking!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2006 1:41:24 GMT
Connect don't want you to use the radio this way... but.... you can pick up the handset press the PTT and transmit and it will come through on the LCs dispatcher unit and on the signaller in your area . I believe it will also come through on every train that is logged on to the controller you are attempting to speak to.
If the LC replys everyone also hears the response, hense 2-way audio for everyone.
There is a problem though, I believe this will cause a load of calls to sit on the line controllers dispatcher, which causes a higher work load for the controller and a greater delay in answering someone else, and also calls keep popping up from cell to cell saying 'waiting' 99mins and 59secs.
I believe the Central work on the cab secure system, which generally means a lot of radio silence, how do they work during a disruption?:
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 13, 2006 2:43:23 GMT
Connect don't want you to use the radio this way... but.... you can pick up the handset press the PTT and transmit and it will come through on the LCs dispatcher unit and on the signaller in your area . I believe it will also come through on every train that is logged on to the controller you are attempting to speak to. You believe? Whoever told you most of that is wrong! Yes we can lift the handset, press the button and talk - only very occasionally a train will pick up the message. It'd be the same for the signallers. The preferred method is to press the 'LC' button - this will inform the line controller by text message that you wish to communicate. It is then up to the line controller as to wether he talks to you one-to-one, or by group call. My issue isn't how the line controller responds to my personal call - it's the fact that if they were to make the odd group broadcast here & there, they would get less calls. Connect is superior to the old system meaning that if a driver uses his/her handheld appropriately, it's nigh on impossible to miss a message. Infact, the system permits the line controllers to send text messages to both handhelds and cab units (I have been turned by use of a text message to my cab unit, so it's possible) - just using this facillity would go a long way..... If the LC replys everyone also hears the response, hense 2-way audio for everyone. Yes, if the controller uses the group call we all hear one side of the conversation - but herein lies the issue.......they ain't using the group call feature enough or for the right reasons. There is a problem though, I believe this will cause a load of calls to sit on the line controllers dispatcher, which causes a higher work load for the controller and a greater delay in answering someone else, That's what I've been saying. and also calls keep popping up from cell to cell saying 'waiting' 99mins and 59secs. That's a new one - I have never seen that!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2006 3:04:47 GMT
Are you sure? Or is the controller ignoring you because he is on another phone, just like you had with the old legacy system?
Thats why I said that connect don't want you to use it this way.
If the repeat function (from the dispatcher) is on, you will hear both sides of the conversation.
This is why I ask the question, how do the Central deal with this? With their older cab-secure system, what do they do in a service disruption? Do they hold trains on a general call rather than on a one to one basis? Do they get station staff to deal with it?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 13, 2006 3:13:27 GMT
I think we got crossed wires there - the District controllers are not using the 'repeat' function.......hence we only hear one side.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2006 3:24:37 GMT
and I guess, thats if they use the group call. If not, nothing is heard at all.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 13, 2006 3:35:18 GMT
and I guess, thats if they use the group call. If not, nothing is heard at all. You get the idea ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
solidbond
Staff Emeritus
'Give me 118 reasons for an Audible Warning on a C Stock'
Posts: 1,215
|
Post by solidbond on Dec 13, 2006 6:57:25 GMT
The way it actually seems to work is that, if the driver makes a 'group call' by just pressing the PTT button, the trains in the same signallers talk group will hear. However, when it was first set up, the Controller would NOT hear messages transmitted like that Hence the problem with Controllers not answering at first. Although it does now seem that the Controller can hear messages when the driver presses the PTT button, because of the problems at the beginning, most drivers now use the LC button instead and wait for the Controller to answer....and wait....and wait....and wait..........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2006 8:12:09 GMT
If you are sat on the front carriage of a Central Line train, you will often hear a general broadcast from the cab radio, such as;
"All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City, into platforms and hold please. We have a xxxxx at xxxxx station".
When whatever problem is solved, the follow up message is something like;
"All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City who were asked to hold, if you have clear codes and signals, please proceed."
Simple, seems effective and is always polite!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2006 16:48:10 GMT
Ahh - they're on a different system though chap...
Sam
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2006 18:33:04 GMT
If you are sat on the front carriage of a Central Line train, you will often hear a general broadcast from the cab radio, such as; "All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City, into platforms and hold please. We have a xxxxx at xxxxx station". When whatever problem is solved, the follow up message is something like; "All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City who were asked to hold, if you have clear codes and signals, please proceed." Simple, seems effective and is always polite! You can often hear something similar on the District.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2006 0:49:51 GMT
If you are sat on the front carriage of a Central Line train, you will often hear a general broadcast from the cab radio, such as; "All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City, into platforms and hold please. We have a xxxxx at xxxxx station". However, with that way of working, there is no guarantee that the T/Op has heard the instruction. A Service controller would rather hear 'received control' than put out a general and hope everyone got it! Although after an incident: This works well, because its obvious that a train hasn't heard, because it sits there (in a platform)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2006 10:16:43 GMT
When connect first came in we could hear both sides of the conversation and all was fine and dandy, then it was stopped and we are, for reasons explained by Colin, worse off than before. Some drivers do try to call the controller using the PTT button direct, since this is not the designated call method, most controllers now ignore such calls or rebuke the caller, telling them to call in the designated manner (using the LC button). As stated before, it is the general absence of "all call" information messages that is a real problem. From my rides about the Central are particularly excellent at making very informative calls as to what is going on about the system. Likewise the Victoria. All you hear on the District is " Train x hold at a", "train y hold at b" ....but you have no idea what's going on. As for reasons for being stuck in a very slow moving queue of trains, all you get is "blocking back driver ..." or ..."train in section ahead" ....well duuuuh, we can deduce that much from the slow running and tail lights of the one in front !!!! If you attempt to quiz them further they get shirty ! lol (especially if it's a circle line calling) Another downside became clear on sun eve, someone with a hand held obviously had it in their bag or coat and the "ptt" press to talk button was continually being engaged, this had two effects, the train radio was continually giving off loud bleeps every time the button went down, about every 2 seconds. It also blocked out the wavelength, preventing trains logging in or changing signaler area.... Control could speak over it, but not stop it and loads of drivers called up to complain about it ....it went on for about 15 mins, not sure if it only affected the group area I was in (Richmond) as all the complaining trains seemed to be on the Richmond branch too. A few drivers have been ticked off for not having the radio logged in ...but i have on several occasions entered all the details and logged on, the radio makes the usual bleeping noises and sets up the usual display, however where your set number and handheld number are it shows "NOT LOGGED IN" but doesn't alert you in any other way to the fact login failed. It seems to occur when the train tries to log in when a long broadcast is being made. But the words "NOT LOGGED IN" are not really visible from my normal driving position, being hidden by the overhang of the set back display. Also if a long broadcast is being made, the radio misses it's queue to change signaler area. Now isn't it a pity I list all these faults here, coz there is no comparable forum for listing them internally ?!!!
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 14, 2006 13:15:47 GMT
Isn't it just Another downside became clear on sun eve, someone with a hand held obviously had it in their bag or coat and the "ptt" press to talk button was continually being engaged, this had two effects, the train radio was continually giving off loud bleeps every time the button went down, about every 2 seconds. It also blocked out the wavelength, preventing trains logging in or changing signaler area.... Control could speak over it, but not stop it and loads of drivers called up to complain about it ....it went on for about 15 mins, not sure if it only affected the group area I was in (Richmond) as all the complaining trains seemed to be on the Richmond branch too. I had that too - but I was in the ECT group ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2006 13:30:41 GMT
BUMP.
I wonder if Connect is exacerbating the current problems at Upminster.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2006 13:39:30 GMT
If you are sat on the front carriage of a Central Line train, you will often hear a general broadcast from the cab radio, such as; "All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City, into platforms and hold please. We have a xxxxx at xxxxx station". When whatever problem is solved, the follow up message is something like; "All East bound drivers between Lancaster Gate and White City who were asked to hold, if you have clear codes and signals, please proceed." Simple, seems effective and is always polite! Lucky you!! I can never hear anything that goes on in the cab! Even when I sit right at the last seat by the bulkhead. Train radio, ATP codes, the lot.....I can't hear a thing!!! I had my hearing tested as part of a medical earlier this year and the nurse said my hearing was very good! I don't get it.......
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 15, 2006 2:14:06 GMT
BUMP. I wonder if Connect is exacerbating the current problems at Upminster. Bump? It's a current thread! ;D ;D ;D Can you elaborate on what you mean by "the current problems at Upminster"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2006 6:55:51 GMT
Lucky you!! I can never hear anything that goes on in the cab! Even when I sit right at the last seat by the bulkhead. Train radio, ATP codes, the lot.....I can't hear a thing!!! I had my hearing tested as part of a medical earlier this year and the nurse said my hearing was very good! I don't get it....... Maybe there are one or two Central Line drivers who need their hearing tested and you didn't! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2006 7:58:12 GMT
It's a shame I can't hear anything as the Central is such an interesting line - it puts more of an edge on it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2006 10:00:25 GMT
BUMP. I wonder if Connect is exacerbating the current problems at Upminster. Bump? It's a current thread! ;D ;D ;D Can you elaborate on what you mean by "the current problems at Upminster"? Yesterday there were severe delays due to signalling problems at Upminster - I suspect the delays were caused by the high dwell times at Barking and the end change times at Dagenham East due to the lowered service.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Dec 15, 2006 17:09:25 GMT
There were signalling problems at UPM, which was the cause of the delay. The short turns were the cure to the problem.
|
|