Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 21:27:47 GMT
Two 5 car class 707 units made their maiden passenger journeys with SWT on Thursday 17th August from Staines to Reading and back to Weybridge. This journey looks to have been a one off with regular service scheduled to take place in September with First/MTR's South Western Railway.
These units are of course living on borrowed time having already been rejected by their new TOC. To me it seems slightly hollow that we are already talking about their replacements on South Western metals as the result of a changing economic climate having entered service two days before the South West Trains brand fades into obscurity after 21 years having been one of a few TOC's to remain since privatisation. Alas no more, from Sunday onwards it's South Western Railway (their website accidentally went live early).
Video uploaded to Youtube by CoachAlex1996 (AlexMetroman)
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,225
|
Post by rincew1nd on Aug 19, 2017 23:13:21 GMT
...two days before the South West Trains brand fades into obscurity after 21 years having been the only TOC to remain since privatisation. Virgin Trains too surely?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,394
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 20, 2017 9:48:20 GMT
and Chiltern and c2c
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2017 10:00:50 GMT
...two days before the South West Trains brand fades into obscurity after 21 years having been the only TOC to remain since privatisation. Virgin Trains too surely? I'd hadn't thought of that. A well established transport magazine devoted a two page article on how SWT was the last of it's kind, as you have pointed out it's evidently not companies. Looks like il have to trawl out that snippet.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Aug 20, 2017 10:18:35 GMT
c2c was LTS from May 1996 until May 2000, the rumour was they changed the name because it had gathered such a bad reputation, the same way they renamed Windscale and called it Sellafield back in the 80s
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2017 15:16:32 GMT
Right folks, after some research I didn't find the exact article but did manage to find a BBC news article citing that, "South West Trains is the only franchise to have remained in the same hands since privatisation 21 years ago." I evidently had blurred the definitions of TOC's and Franchises when writing the initial post. Stagecoach have of course been the custodians of SWT since it's inception. Now given the factually correct comments from rincew1nd and Chris M , Im guessing that Paul Clifton (BBC South transport correspondent) has made this comment based on the following histories of the other remaining franchises and their parent companies. Virgin Trains (West Coast): Virgin Rail Group was awarded the InterCity West Coast franchise in January 1997, operations commenced on 9 March 1997, in October of that year Virgin Trains Group sold 49% of it's shares to Stagecoach. Both the Virgin CrossCountry and Virgin Trains West Coast franchises were suspended in favour of management contracts in July 2002. Chiltern Railways: In June 1996 M40 Trains was awarded the Chiltern Railways franchise, operations commenced on 21 July 1996. In September 2006 John Laing (part of the original ex-BR management buyout) was purchased by Henderson Equity Partners. In January 2008 Laing Rail was purchased by Deutsche Bahn and Chiltern became part of the DB Regio group. A restructure in early 2011 saw DB Regio become a subsidiary of Arriva UK Trains. c2c: The London, Tilbury & Southend franchise was due to start in February 1996, but after the discovery of ticketing and settlement irregularities within hours of the scheduled handover with the preferred bidder, Enterprise Rail, it was re-tendered. In May 1996, the franchise was awarded to Prism Rail. It began operating as LTS Rail on 26 May 1996. In May 2000, (as mentioned by aslefshrugged ) the business was rebranded as c2c. In July 2000, c2c was included in the sale of Prism Rail to National Express. In February 2017 National Express sold c2c to Trenitalia. So, was SWT the only remaining franchise (up until yesterday) to have the same parent company since privatisation?
|
|
|
Post by A60stock on Aug 20, 2017 21:41:36 GMT
surely these trains are not going to be scrapped once they are taken out of service?
Why has the new TOC rejected them? Leasing costs too high?
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Aug 20, 2017 22:02:30 GMT
surely these trains are not going to be scrapped once they are taken out of service? Why has the new TOC rejected them? Leasing costs too high? It's very unlikely that they'll be scrapped. They'll find a home somewhere, I'm sure. As for why they've been dropped, in part down to leasing costs, in part down to the desire to have a common fleet for all of the suburban work rather like the S stock situation. If Siemens had been able to do a good deal on the 707s with a bit of fettling to make them more closely match the needs of the new operators, then they could have been retained and added to in greater numbers, but instead there is the new fleet.
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Aug 20, 2017 22:03:56 GMT
surely these trains are not going to be scrapped once they are taken out of service? Why has the new TOC rejected them? Leasing costs too high? There is no way in hell they will be scrapped once they are taken out of service. First/MTR have rejected the 707s because it is cheaper for them to order an entire new fleet of trains. When the 707s were ordered, demand for rolling stock was higher, therefore the leasing costs from its respective ROSCO is also higher. In addition to cost, I believe the 707s fall short with respect to what First/MTR want in terms of capacity, although I'm unsure of the specifics. It is a shame as this is completely inefficient in my opinion. Although from what I understand, the 707s aren't exactly great in terms of specification.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Aug 21, 2017 17:45:06 GMT
surely these trains are not going to be scrapped once they are taken out of service? Why has the new TOC rejected them? Leasing costs too high? There is no way in hell they will be scrapped once they are taken out of service. First/MTR have rejected the 707s because it is cheaper for them to order an entire new fleet of trains. When the 707s were ordered, demand for rolling stock was higher, therefore the leasing costs from its respective ROSCO is also higher. In addition to cost, I believe the 707s fall short with respect to what First/MTR want in terms of capacity, although I'm unsure of the specifics. It is a shame as this is completely inefficient in my opinion. Although from what I understand, the 707s aren't exactly great in terms of specification. It sort of depends on what you mean by 'capacity' and 'specification' When SWT ordered the 707s they wanted them to have a high capacity for standing passengers, so although not going to the extremes of TfL trains and having longitudinal seating, the 707s do feature wide isles and relatively few seats compared to other suburban EMU builds, plus large circulation areas by the doors to facilitate speedy boarding / alighting at peak times. By contrast the new franchise owner emphasised 'quality' in its bids - for example putting toilets on all trains. This comes at a price because the average 'accessible toilet' module (1 per unit needed if toilets are installed) takes up 1/3rd of a coach that could otherwise be occupied by seats or provide standing space (as is the case in the 707s). True 10 car fixed formation trains will save space by removing two driving cabs, but overall the new units being procured will not necessarily have more capacity overall than the 707s - with lots of standee space being lost to fit toilets and seats, though the overall 'specification' will be better as it were....
|
|
|
Post by phil on Aug 21, 2017 17:53:49 GMT
It should be noted however that the modular nature of modern trains means that provision has been made in the 707s for the fitment of toilet modules, a better seating layout (i.e. a first class section), as well as being capable of 25KV AC operation by simply adding a transformer and Pantograph. Thus its quite likely they will find a home somewhere - the cancellation of electrification schemes making it more likely they will displace further BR built units*
*The 455 fleet on Southern or Networkers in Kent being an obvious option - the latter potentially seeing a 485 style reformation of chicles to create 6 car units (this cannot be done with Electrostars due to software limitations).
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Aug 21, 2017 21:59:48 GMT
*The 455 fleet on Southern or Networkers in Kent being an obvious option - the latter potentially seeing a 485 style reformation of vehicles to create 6 car units I assume you mean the 458s - the 485 were the old Standard Tube stock units on the Isle of Wight. That solution worked because there was a fleet of eight car trains (the 460s) which could be reduced to five car, the spare cars then being added to the 4 car class 458s to make them 5 car as well. There was no need to convert driving to non driving cars, or vice versa. Converting the 707s from five car to six car would need either sourcing 30 new intermediate cars, or converting ten cars from driving to non-driving, which means major structural work.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Aug 21, 2017 22:03:14 GMT
*The 455 fleet on Southern or Networkers in Kent being an obvious option - the latter potentially seeing a 485 style reformation of vehicles to create 6 car units I assume you mean the 458s - the 485 were the old Standard Tube stock units on the Isle of Wight. That solution worked because there was a fleet of eight car trains (the 460s) which could be reduced to five car, the spare cars then being added to the 4 car class 458s to make them 5 car as well. There was no need to convert driving to non driving cars, or vice versa. Converting the 707s from five car to six car would need either sourcing 30 new intermediate cars, or converting ten cars from driving to non-driving, which means major structural work. In this case, it is quite fortunate then that the Desiro City is quite a new build, and the factory is rather short of orders, so an order for some more cars could quite easily be arranged I suspect.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Aug 21, 2017 22:07:19 GMT
...two days before the South West Trains brand fades into obscurity after 21 years having been the only TOC to remain since privatisation. Virgin Trains too surely? SWT was one of the first two franchises to be launched, (there were to have been three, but the aforementioned discovery of ticketing fraud caused the plug to be pulled on the third) The other one was Great Western, which has been through several changes of area covered (it now includes the former Thames Trains franchise and part of the Wales and Wessex one), and owner.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Aug 22, 2017 16:40:41 GMT
I assume you mean the 458s - the 485 were the old Standard Tube stock units on the Isle of Wight. That solution worked because there was a fleet of eight car trains (the 460s) which could be reduced to five car, the spare cars then being added to the 4 car class 458s to make them 5 car as well. There was no need to convert driving to non driving cars, or vice versa. Converting the 707s from five car to six car would need either sourcing 30 new intermediate cars, or converting ten cars from driving to non-driving, which means major structural work. In this case, it is quite fortunate then that the Desiro City is quite a new build, and the factory is rather short of orders, so an order for some more cars could quite easily be arranged I suspect. Indeed so - the 707s being fundamentally the same as the 700s being built for Thameslink or the future units that will replace the 313s to Moorgate.
|
|