|
Post by auxsetreq on Dec 2, 2011 9:46:41 GMT
.......Problem......."A Safety Feature?" he surmises............Love the head butt motion by way of demonstration............... I saw this on telly last night on the regional news. What isn't shown on the clip below as it appears to be an edited version of the broadcast is - Managements excuse for these problems. Their excuse is that the trains were ordered before before the collapse of PPP and Bombardier didn't have the time to test these trains properly. But as I recall the Vic shut down it's service early for quite a long period so these trains could be given a proper testing. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15994690
|
|
|
Post by trt on Dec 2, 2011 10:40:58 GMT
Would it be the case that it's made worse by the alternating platform sides around Euston, King's Cross, Warren Street? If someone's coat is a little bit caught but not enough to trigger the sensitive edge, and they don't notice or think they'll free it at the next station, then the "wrong side" opens, they panic and try to yank themselves free triggering a problem on the side that can't be opened and reset?
Just a thought (and not mine!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2011 11:55:22 GMT
It always annoys me greatly to hear people try to blame the train when it is, in fact, their own fault for causing any "delays". "Leaning" on the 09's doors doesn't cause any problems per se, does it?
Actually, the way I see it is this - most of the problems mentioned are caused by the fact that people attempt to cram onto a train no matter how crowded it is. When the doors close, something is bound to get caught or trapped. Objects such as bag straps or part of a coat may be small and thin enough such that the doors are not prevented from closing and locking. The sensitive edges will obviously be triggered if there is any movement of the object concerned after the train has started moving off, thereby resulting in possible "delays".
Why can't people just wait 1-2 minutes for the next train, which they will probably have a much greater chance of boarding?
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 2, 2011 12:52:00 GMT
Because on *some* lines, the next train is also pretty crammed, and it then takes a while for the next train to arrive. If I needed a Hainault, and the next train happens to be a Hainault and overcrowded, and the only trains after that for 15 minutes are Eppings, I would definitely take the first Hainault one.
|
|
|
Post by seaeagle on Dec 2, 2011 13:48:05 GMT
Would it be the case that it's made worse by the alternating platform sides around Euston, King's Cross, Warren Street? If someone's coat is a little bit caught but not enough to trigger the sensitive edge, and they don't notice or think they'll free it at the next station, then the "wrong side" opens, they panic and try to yank themselves free triggering a problem on the side that can't be opened and reset? Just a thought (and not mine!) The majority of times I've have sensitive edge problems are in the Kings Cross to Oxford Circus areas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2011 13:52:30 GMT
Managements excuse for these problems. Their excuse is that the trains were ordered before before the collapse of PPP and Bombardier didn't have the time to test these trains properly. I heard this and was baffled. Reading between the lines, does it mean that the current management didn't want these trains, or that they didn't like the procurement process?
|
|
|
Post by trt on Dec 2, 2011 13:59:18 GMT
seaeagle - Highbury to Oxford Circus is the most crowded bit of the Vic in the AM peak. According to the heatmap recently linked to on this board. www.ciltuk.org.uk/download_files/sg023presentation.pdfMind you, I'm not sure how accurate that is, as the City branch is usually severely crowded all the way from Euston to Bank!
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Dec 2, 2011 14:02:08 GMT
Would it be the case that it's made worse by the alternating platform sides around Euston, King's Cross, Warren Street? If someone's coat is a little bit caught but not enough to trigger the sensitive edge, and they don't notice or think they'll free it at the next station, then the "wrong side" opens, they panic and try to yank themselves free triggering a problem on the side that can't be opened and reset? Just a thought (and not mine!) The majority of times I've have sensitive edge problems are in the Kings Cross to Oxford Circus areas. Sounds like you need to get that checked out by a doctor! ;D On a more serious note there are so many safety features or procedures being cut back on to save time (eg setting back, platform recategorization...) and here we have a safety feature causing heavy delays that isn't being sorted out. The important note is that nobody has been dragged by these trains AFAIK
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 3, 2011 11:49:55 GMT
Simple solution - turn off the sensitive edge feature. Was the most ridiculous idea ever, and it was obvious from the start that it would cause delays.
We need doors that slam shut hard like the old Paris Metro Sprague trains. I was told that you only ever got caught in those doors once . . .
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Dec 3, 2011 12:21:40 GMT
Simple solution - turn off the sensitive edge feature. Was the most ridiculous idea ever, and it was obvious from the start that it would cause delays. We need doors that slam shut hard like the old Paris Metro Sprague trains. I was told that you only ever got caught in those doors once . . . I know one of the trainers who was involved with these trains from the start. Way back then he knew these doors would be problematic, and he's been proved right. Wasn't this idea tried out way back when - twenties, thirties? An idea abandoned back then and resurrected now, perhaps to be re abandoned soon. Can't wait to see the EVO tube train. It's bound to have sensitive edges as part of it's driverless "safety" features "Roll up, Roll up! - Come see our new EVO tube set off from The Elephant. It should reach Baker Street sometime next year............"
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 3, 2011 13:01:22 GMT
When that happens, I'll be at each station every month Might as well triple track the Bakerloo, just in case
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Dec 3, 2011 18:44:48 GMT
I fully support sensitive edge. Its the best way at the moment to ensure that nothing is caught in the doors from the inside or outside. The likelihood and risk of injury is too high not to have it. The system is problematic at the moment (as any new system is when it is first introduced) but the problems will go in a couple of years.
If I was in charge I would of course get rid of the sensitive edge, and put black paint on doors so anyone that got caught in the doors would get a big black mark along them. But we live in the world where everybody sues so we can't live like that any more. Back in the day you used to be hit by a door and just get on with life as you knew it was your fault!
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 3, 2011 19:21:00 GMT
Or just have doors that will still try to close when there's something in between, and when the driver thinks it takes too long, reopening them, waiting a few seconds then trying to close them.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 4, 2011 12:51:20 GMT
I fully support sensitive edge. Its the best way at the moment to ensure that nothing is caught in the doors from the inside or outside. The likelihood and risk of injury is too high not to have it. The system is problematic at the moment (as any new system is when it is first introduced) but the problems will go in a couple of years. If I was in charge I would of course get rid of the sensitive edge, and put black paint on doors so anyone that got caught in the doors would get a big black mark along them. But we live in the world where everybody sues so we can't live like that any more. Back in the day you used to be hit by a door and just get on with life as you knew it was your fault! The problems will only go if passengers change their behaviour. Can you see that happening? If not, then the delays caused by these sensitive edges will continue indefinitely.
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 4, 2011 13:43:29 GMT
Mentality changes... unlikely nowadays. It seems they're only able to change their behaviour when the train is stranded between stations or if they forget something (according to that new Central line related campaign)
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Dec 4, 2011 20:09:44 GMT
This whole thread is "Meh". Central Line still suffers issue with the doors and doesn't have sensitive edges. I've even witnessed it on the Jubilee Line.
Next train isn't plausible. Some days you can wait for 5 trains before you get one you can board even if they are one behind the other.
Unfortunately it's all health & safety. Either the doors are too safe and can cause delays or their are no safety systems and someone gets dragged into the tunnels because their bag strap was caught in the door and they didn't realise. Then typically TFL gets scrutiny.
Passengers don't realise. A 92ts had stopped at Leyton Westbound once, half the train had left the platform. I casually walked in between the train and the yellow line to find a man with his bag caught in the door but wasn't aware. It wasn't until I banged on the door and yelled "Your bag is caught in the door, you are delaying my day you useless man!" that he removed his bag and the train proceeded as normal. Door was barely open a centimetre.
He had his earphones on and quite simply wasn't paying attention like most passengers do and then blame TFL.
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 5, 2011 12:57:35 GMT
But what's wrong then with the good old pilot light, then? Has it ever failed?
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Dec 5, 2011 13:18:31 GMT
But what's wrong then with the good old pilot light, then? Has it ever failed? You should read up on why sensitive edge was introduced before asking that question. If a door closes you will get a pilot light. However there could be a bag strap or coat toggle stuck in the doors. Sensitive edge will prevent accidental dragging of such items stuck in the doors.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Dec 5, 2011 13:38:50 GMT
What use is a pilot light when somebody's coat belt or bag strap gets caught in the door IF the person to whom it is attached is still on the platform?? Surely that's what sensitive edge is about?? A bag strap or coat caught in the doors when the PAX is on board the train is unlikely to be fatal, but on the platform edge, could well be.
SEEMples!
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 5, 2011 13:47:25 GMT
Yup. Indeed. Although all the problems need ironing out... and perhaps people should try to jam themselves into the train further while we're hearing the beeps and when the train starts driving move more towards the doors.. or just have all tip-up seating on the Vic.
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Dec 5, 2011 19:24:27 GMT
The problems will only go if passengers change their behaviour. Can you see that happening? If not, then the delays caused by these sensitive edges will continue indefinitely. Remember the kid in 1997 at Holborn where he was killed as he was dragged along the platform and into the tunnel by the toggle of his anorak? I wonder what his parents would think? Or what about the incident in 1993 at Hounslow East. Elderly woman killed as she was dragged by the departing train with her coat caught in the doors. A fantastic system such as Sensitive Edge does take a while to settle in. Its a system that requires adjustment. Its a system which is SAFE. I would much rather see Mr Driver be delayed in moving the train because of sensitive edge activation rather than a part/whole service suspension due to a police investigation because some poor soul has been trapped in the doors and pulled through the tunnel. This is an age old problem which needs a 21st century solution. Sensitive Edge. You have to have it in service and observe its performance to be able to make the required adjustments.
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 5, 2011 19:37:54 GMT
By making it less sensitive and relieving the Victoria line as a side effect?
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Dec 9, 2011 22:23:57 GMT
Yet the 1995 and 1996 stocks don't seem to suffer from these problems even when they are packed! I was in a packed 1996 stock people leaning against the doors the train moved off no problem. The underground is very frequent I very much doubt that you would wait anymore than 3 minutes for a train in the peaks why can't people just wait for the next one i apprecciate that people are in a hurry but these people are actually making them selves late by leaning against the doors!
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Dec 9, 2011 22:31:38 GMT
Leaning against the doors is a different kettle of fish that affects the door proved closed circuit. Sensitive edge is like a bolt on if you will.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 10, 2011 12:11:18 GMT
The problems will only go if passengers change their behaviour. Can you see that happening? If not, then the delays caused by these sensitive edges will continue indefinitely. Remember the kid in 1997 at Holborn where he was killed as he was dragged along the platform and into the tunnel by the toggle of his anorak? I wonder what his parents would think? Or what about the incident in 1993 at Hounslow East. Elderly woman killed as she was dragged by the departing train with her coat caught in the doors. A fantastic system such as Sensitive Edge does take a while to settle in. Its a system that requires adjustment. Its a system which is SAFE. I would much rather see Mr Driver be delayed in moving the train because of sensitive edge activation rather than a part/whole service suspension due to a police investigation because some poor soul has been trapped in the doors and pulled through the tunnel. This is an age old problem which needs a 21st century solution. Sensitive Edge. You have to have it in service and observe its performance to be able to make the required adjustments. Accidents happen. Do we install fences along the side of every road just in case someone happens to fall into the road? While the incidents you describe are very unfortunate and tragic for the families concerned, they are, when compared against the billions of safe journeys undertaken, insignificant and do not warrant inconveniencing millions of passengers by delaying them with silly ideas like sensitive door edges. The system will not bed in until passengers change their behaviour regarding obstructing the doors. Not going to happen I'm afraid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2011 13:16:42 GMT
I think the reasons for accidents happening before like people getting killed because of stuff caught in the doors and dragged into the tunnel was that the trains didnt have door closing alarms then and they didnt know the doors were closing
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Dec 10, 2011 14:04:52 GMT
Remember the kid in 1997 at Holborn where he was killed as he was dragged along the platform and into the tunnel by the toggle of his anorak? I wonder what his parents would think? Or what about the incident in 1993 at Hounslow East. Elderly woman killed as she was dragged by the departing train with her coat caught in the doors. A fantastic system such as Sensitive Edge does take a while to settle in. Its a system that requires adjustment. Its a system which is SAFE. I would much rather see Mr Driver be delayed in moving the train because of sensitive edge activation rather than a part/whole service suspension due to a police investigation because some poor soul has been trapped in the doors and pulled through the tunnel. This is an age old problem which needs a 21st century solution. Sensitive Edge. You have to have it in service and observe its performance to be able to make the required adjustments. Accidents happen. Do we install fences along the side of every road just in case someone happens to fall into the road? While the incidents you describe are very unfortunate and tragic for the families concerned, they are, when compared against the billions of safe journeys undertaken, insignificant and do not warrant inconveniencing millions of passengers by delaying them with silly ideas like sensitive door edges. The system will not bed in until passengers change their behaviour regarding obstructing the doors. Not going to happen I'm afraid. If what I saw yesterday is any guide, then there will be changes. A Victoria line train at Euston had someone blocking the door, trying to get in. The driver said 'do not block the doors', when this didn't work, he repeated himself, then reopened them just a little bit (20-30cm or so) and closed them. This allowed the person trying to get in to extract themselves from the door and we left, with the selfish idiot still on the platform. I would hope that such a procedure becomes standard, rather than opening the doors fully and so allowing a new 'group' to try and rush on.
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Dec 10, 2011 21:26:48 GMT
I will not regard that comment as quite frankly I think it is flippant.
Lets just get this clear, If someone gets their arm/ head or bag caught in the door that will cause the door to open and close 3 times (Obstacle detection)
Sensitive edge only happens when the door is proved closed and locked and something is stuck in it and pulled, like a bag strap, etc.
I wonder, when we got rid of slam door stock there was a big uproar about electronic doors... "Oh, someone is bound to get their head stuck in the door", "When will we know when the doors are closing as we can't close them ourselves", "I'm never going to get a seat as there are not as many doors as before".
Obstructing the doors will always happen, people will always run for the train when they hear the door chime, that's just a standard re-opening procedure if something large is caught. A safety system for doors closed and locked and a thin item caught is here, and we can either embrace it and go with the times as things evolve, or be stuck in the 20th Century - Where there will be no detection and possible deaths/ Injuries just as before. 1 death in any transportation system is 1 too many. We have to learn to advance, we've learnt that people get straps in doors, now we have a solution to stop a train if that happens.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 10, 2011 22:21:49 GMT
I will not regard that comment as quite frankly I think it is flippant. Lets just get this clear, If someone gets their arm/ head or bag caught in the door that will cause the door to open and close 3 times (Obstacle detection) Sensitive edge only happens when the door is proved closed and locked and something is stuck in it and pulled, like a bag strap, etc. I wonder, when we got rid of slam door stock there was a big uproar about electronic doors... "Oh, someone is bound to get their head stuck in the door", "When will we know when the doors are closing as we can't close them ourselves", "I'm never going to get a seat as there are not as many doors as before". Obstructing the doors will always happen, people will always run for the train when they hear the door chime, that's just a standard re-opening procedure if something large is caught. A safety system for doors closed and locked and a thin item caught is here, and we can either embrace it and go with the times as things evolve, or be stuck in the 20th Century - Where there will be no detection and possible deaths/ Injuries just as before. 1 death in any transportation system is 1 too many. We have to learn to advance, we've learnt that people get straps in doors, now we have a solution to stop a train if that happens. Firsrly, it's not a flippant comment, but a fact. Accidents do happen, and I was merely trying to make the point that we cannot put things into place to deal with every possible eventuality. And you mention "advance". Well, if a frequently delayed service is an "advance", then well done. Incidentally, are you a Victoria line user? As for the comment about slam doors being replaced with automatic sliding doors, back then there was a greater level of acceptance that in life, people needed to be careful to protect their own safety, so I doubt there were any worries about people getting stuck in sliding doors. I'm not against a system that improves safety or protect people from injury, but I am against a system that needlessly delays tens of thousands of passengers. I'm sorry to spoil your illusion, but the system just cannot survive in its current form, especially when they try to run 33tph on the line.
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Dec 10, 2011 23:43:17 GMT
Accidents do happen, but we can minimise the possibility of common accidents occurring.
I think you are under an illusion as to how many of these sensitive edge incidents occur.
As opposed to now where people will happily trip/ fall/ get stuck with no regard or care for themselves (and others') and sue? Therefore we cannot assume any human can be 'careful' in today's world. So there has to be a system in place to make sure even the most careless of people can be protected.
This is not a needless system, something has to be done otherwise we are not progressing to try to remove accidents from the tube network.
And I am a regular Vic line user, as I live on it, and get to work on it most days.
|
|